24.12.2012 Views

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Topic 4: Clinical <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trials and Trial Site Challenges<br />

P04.09<br />

Sexual Behavior Among Volunteers Enrolled in a<br />

Phase I <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trial:<br />

Experience of Projet San Francisco in Kigali, Rwanda<br />

J. Mukamuyango 1 , E. Karita 1 , R. Bayingana 1 , J. Nyombayire 1 ,<br />

R. Ingabire 1 , S. Allen 2 , A. Tichacek 2 , P. Fast 3 , M. Price 3 , C. Schmidt 3<br />

1 Projet San Francisco, Kigali, Rwanda; 2 Emory University,<br />

Atlanta, GA, USA; 3 International AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative, New<br />

York, NY, USA<br />

Background: Phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong> vaccine trials are conducted among<br />

<strong>HIV</strong>-uninfected, healthy volunteers at low risk for <strong>HIV</strong>. Study<br />

volunteers are counseled to maintain low risk behavior for <strong>HIV</strong><br />

acquisition. The objective of this study was to assess sexual<br />

behavior of volunteers in a Phase 1 vaccine trial, conducted in<br />

Kigali, Rwanda.<br />

Methods: Concordant <strong>HIV</strong>-negative couples who were counseled<br />

and tested together were considered as low risk group for <strong>HIV</strong><br />

acquisition and were invited to participate in Phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong> vaccine<br />

trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a multiclade <strong>HIV</strong>-<br />

1 DNA plasmid vaccine followed by a recombinant, multiclade<br />

<strong>HIV</strong>-1 adenoviral vector vaccine (IAVI V0<strong>01</strong>). <strong>HIV</strong> risk reduction<br />

counseling, assessment of sexual behavior and screening for<br />

sexually transmitted infections (STI) were conducted quarterly.<br />

After completion of the vaccine trial, participants and their<br />

partners were invited to participate in a long-term 5-year followup<br />

study from their last vaccination for further assessment of<br />

sexual behavior and continuous risk reduction counseling.<br />

Results: Between November 2005 and May 2006, 57 volunteers<br />

(36 men and 21 women) were enrolled in the clinical trial. All<br />

volunteers completed their trial visits. During the first twelve<br />

months following the first vaccination, none of the study<br />

participants reported sex with other partners nor was treated<br />

for STI. After unblinding, 55 volunteers agreed to continue in<br />

long-term follow up study. Through January 2<strong>01</strong>2 6 men and 2<br />

women reported having sex at least once with other partners;<br />

two were treated for STI, and one subsequently acquired <strong>HIV</strong>.<br />

(<strong>HIV</strong> incidence rate: 0.3/100 person-years).<br />

Conclusion: This trial and subsequent follow-up study confirm<br />

our previous findings that concordant <strong>HIV</strong>-negative couples are at<br />

low risk of <strong>HIV</strong> infection and suitable for enrolling in Phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong><br />

prevention trials. Ongoing <strong>HIV</strong> risk reduction counseling should be<br />

provided during the trial as well as after the trail, if possible.<br />

P04.10<br />

AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> 2<strong>01</strong>2<br />

Posters<br />

Developing Standards of Care for <strong>HIV</strong> Prevention<br />

Research in Developing Countries – A Case Study of<br />

Ten Research Centers in Eastern and Southern Africa<br />

B.P. Ngongo 1 , F. Priddy 1 , H. Park 1 , B. Bender 1 , P. Fast 1 , O. Anzala 2 ,<br />

G. Mutua 2 , E. Ruzagira 3 , A. Kamali 4 , E. Karita 5 , P. Mugo 6 ,<br />

E. Chomba 7 , L. Bekker 8 , S. Roux 8 , A. Nanvubya 9 , T. Mebrahtu 9<br />

1 International AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya; 2 Kenya<br />

AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya; 3 Medical Research<br />

Council – UVRI, Entebbe, Uganda; 4 MRC-UVRI, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda; 5 Projet San Francisco, Kigali, Rwanda; 6 KEMRI-<br />

CGMRC, Kilifi, Kenya; 7 Zambia Emory <strong>HIV</strong> Research Program,<br />

Lusaka, Zambia; 8 Desmond Tutu <strong>HIV</strong> Foundation, Cape<br />

Town, South Africa; 9 Uganda Virus Research Institute – IAVI,<br />

Entebbe, Uganda<br />

Background: Standards of care in general vary across countries<br />

and communities and thus may affect decisions about standards<br />

of care provided by research centers in <strong>HIV</strong> prevention research.<br />

To serve as a basis for clarifying and improving standards, a<br />

systematic survey of practices at 10 experienced research centers<br />

affiliated with the International AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative in Eastern<br />

and Southern Africa was conducted between 2008 and 2<strong>01</strong>0.<br />

Methods: A survey tool was developed to collect qualitative<br />

and quantitative data on types of services provided, recipients<br />

of services, referral systems and barriers to referral uptake.<br />

Focus group discussion and semi-structured interviews were<br />

conducted with key research centre staff. Qualitative data were<br />

coded and enumerated where appropriate. Quantitative data<br />

were categorized and tabulated using STATA.<br />

Results: All research centres consistently provided <strong>HIV</strong> prevention<br />

and care services but had varied practices on family planning<br />

options, and general medical care to research volunteers, screen<br />

out volunteers, partners of volunteers, and former volunteers.<br />

Services that were less consistently provided included<br />

provision of female condoms and anti-retroviral post-exposureprophylaxis<br />

to volunteers in case of rape. All research centres<br />

either had referral points for treatment and care for volunteers<br />

who become infected with <strong>HIV</strong> or provided the services on-site.<br />

Limited referral points were available for psychosocial services<br />

and adult male circumcision. The greatest challenges for referral<br />

uptake included transportation and health care costs, poor<br />

quality and inconsistency of services at some referral points.<br />

While all research centres covered the cost of health services for<br />

study-related adverse events, policies varied on covering the cost<br />

of other health services.<br />

Conclusion: These findings informed the development of<br />

standards of care across the 10 research centers and for IAVIsponsored<br />

research. In developing such standards, balance<br />

should be made between scientific priorities, considerations<br />

of fairness, contextual realities, community expectations, and<br />

cost-effectiveness of conducting clinical trials<br />

153<br />

POSTERS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!