Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise
Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise
Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Topic 4: Clinical <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trials and Trial Site Challenges<br />
P04.09<br />
Sexual Behavior Among Volunteers Enrolled in a<br />
Phase I <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trial:<br />
Experience of Projet San Francisco in Kigali, Rwanda<br />
J. Mukamuyango 1 , E. Karita 1 , R. Bayingana 1 , J. Nyombayire 1 ,<br />
R. Ingabire 1 , S. Allen 2 , A. Tichacek 2 , P. Fast 3 , M. Price 3 , C. Schmidt 3<br />
1 Projet San Francisco, Kigali, Rwanda; 2 Emory University,<br />
Atlanta, GA, USA; 3 International AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative, New<br />
York, NY, USA<br />
Background: Phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong> vaccine trials are conducted among<br />
<strong>HIV</strong>-uninfected, healthy volunteers at low risk for <strong>HIV</strong>. Study<br />
volunteers are counseled to maintain low risk behavior for <strong>HIV</strong><br />
acquisition. The objective of this study was to assess sexual<br />
behavior of volunteers in a Phase 1 vaccine trial, conducted in<br />
Kigali, Rwanda.<br />
Methods: Concordant <strong>HIV</strong>-negative couples who were counseled<br />
and tested together were considered as low risk group for <strong>HIV</strong><br />
acquisition and were invited to participate in Phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong> vaccine<br />
trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a multiclade <strong>HIV</strong>-<br />
1 DNA plasmid vaccine followed by a recombinant, multiclade<br />
<strong>HIV</strong>-1 adenoviral vector vaccine (IAVI V0<strong>01</strong>). <strong>HIV</strong> risk reduction<br />
counseling, assessment of sexual behavior and screening for<br />
sexually transmitted infections (STI) were conducted quarterly.<br />
After completion of the vaccine trial, participants and their<br />
partners were invited to participate in a long-term 5-year followup<br />
study from their last vaccination for further assessment of<br />
sexual behavior and continuous risk reduction counseling.<br />
Results: Between November 2005 and May 2006, 57 volunteers<br />
(36 men and 21 women) were enrolled in the clinical trial. All<br />
volunteers completed their trial visits. During the first twelve<br />
months following the first vaccination, none of the study<br />
participants reported sex with other partners nor was treated<br />
for STI. After unblinding, 55 volunteers agreed to continue in<br />
long-term follow up study. Through January 2<strong>01</strong>2 6 men and 2<br />
women reported having sex at least once with other partners;<br />
two were treated for STI, and one subsequently acquired <strong>HIV</strong>.<br />
(<strong>HIV</strong> incidence rate: 0.3/100 person-years).<br />
Conclusion: This trial and subsequent follow-up study confirm<br />
our previous findings that concordant <strong>HIV</strong>-negative couples are at<br />
low risk of <strong>HIV</strong> infection and suitable for enrolling in Phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong><br />
prevention trials. Ongoing <strong>HIV</strong> risk reduction counseling should be<br />
provided during the trial as well as after the trail, if possible.<br />
P04.10<br />
AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> 2<strong>01</strong>2<br />
Posters<br />
Developing Standards of Care for <strong>HIV</strong> Prevention<br />
Research in Developing Countries – A Case Study of<br />
Ten Research Centers in Eastern and Southern Africa<br />
B.P. Ngongo 1 , F. Priddy 1 , H. Park 1 , B. Bender 1 , P. Fast 1 , O. Anzala 2 ,<br />
G. Mutua 2 , E. Ruzagira 3 , A. Kamali 4 , E. Karita 5 , P. Mugo 6 ,<br />
E. Chomba 7 , L. Bekker 8 , S. Roux 8 , A. Nanvubya 9 , T. Mebrahtu 9<br />
1 International AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya; 2 Kenya<br />
AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya; 3 Medical Research<br />
Council – UVRI, Entebbe, Uganda; 4 MRC-UVRI, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda; 5 Projet San Francisco, Kigali, Rwanda; 6 KEMRI-<br />
CGMRC, Kilifi, Kenya; 7 Zambia Emory <strong>HIV</strong> Research Program,<br />
Lusaka, Zambia; 8 Desmond Tutu <strong>HIV</strong> Foundation, Cape<br />
Town, South Africa; 9 Uganda Virus Research Institute – IAVI,<br />
Entebbe, Uganda<br />
Background: Standards of care in general vary across countries<br />
and communities and thus may affect decisions about standards<br />
of care provided by research centers in <strong>HIV</strong> prevention research.<br />
To serve as a basis for clarifying and improving standards, a<br />
systematic survey of practices at 10 experienced research centers<br />
affiliated with the International AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> Initiative in Eastern<br />
and Southern Africa was conducted between 2008 and 2<strong>01</strong>0.<br />
Methods: A survey tool was developed to collect qualitative<br />
and quantitative data on types of services provided, recipients<br />
of services, referral systems and barriers to referral uptake.<br />
Focus group discussion and semi-structured interviews were<br />
conducted with key research centre staff. Qualitative data were<br />
coded and enumerated where appropriate. Quantitative data<br />
were categorized and tabulated using STATA.<br />
Results: All research centres consistently provided <strong>HIV</strong> prevention<br />
and care services but had varied practices on family planning<br />
options, and general medical care to research volunteers, screen<br />
out volunteers, partners of volunteers, and former volunteers.<br />
Services that were less consistently provided included<br />
provision of female condoms and anti-retroviral post-exposureprophylaxis<br />
to volunteers in case of rape. All research centres<br />
either had referral points for treatment and care for volunteers<br />
who become infected with <strong>HIV</strong> or provided the services on-site.<br />
Limited referral points were available for psychosocial services<br />
and adult male circumcision. The greatest challenges for referral<br />
uptake included transportation and health care costs, poor<br />
quality and inconsistency of services at some referral points.<br />
While all research centres covered the cost of health services for<br />
study-related adverse events, policies varied on covering the cost<br />
of other health services.<br />
Conclusion: These findings informed the development of<br />
standards of care across the 10 research centers and for IAVIsponsored<br />
research. In developing such standards, balance<br />
should be made between scientific priorities, considerations<br />
of fairness, contextual realities, community expectations, and<br />
cost-effectiveness of conducting clinical trials<br />
153<br />
POSTERS