Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2010
157
Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part
in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10–141. Abdul Karim Hassan, Petitioner v. United States. Petition
for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 10–206. David S. Gould, Sheriff, Cayuga County, New York,
et al., Petitioners v. Cayuga Indian Nation of New York. Petition for
writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied. Justice
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10–5038. Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, et vir, Petitioners v. Connecticut.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of
Connecticut dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly
abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any
further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the
docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in
compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court
of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 10–5039. Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, et vir, Petitioners v. Connecticut.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of
Connecticut dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly
abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any
further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the
docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in
compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court
of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 10–5040. Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, et vir, Petitioners v. Connecticut.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of
Connecticut dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly
abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any
further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the
docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in
compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court
of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 10–5065. Rudy Stanko, Petitioner v. Ricardo Rios, Warden, et al.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied,
and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.