24.12.2012 Views

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

604 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2011<br />

<strong>the</strong> Clerk is directed not to accept any fur<strong>the</strong>r petitions in noncriminal<br />

matters from petitioner unless <strong>the</strong> docketing fee required by Rule 38(a)<br />

is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin<br />

v. District <strong>of</strong> Columbia <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per<br />

curiam).<br />

No. 10–7965. Gary Yoder, Petitioner v. William White, Warden. Motion<br />

<strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 10–7996. Daryl Murphy, Petitioner v. Eddy Murphy Productions,<br />

Incorporated, et al. Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Seventh Circuit denied. The Chief Justice<br />

took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> this petition.<br />

No. 10–8050. Richard Mills, Petitioner v. John Lempke, Superintendent,<br />

Five Points Correctional Facility. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to<br />

proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari<br />

to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Second Circuit dismissed.<br />

See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 10–8055. Richard F. Mills, Petitioner v. New York. Motion <strong>of</strong><br />

petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition<br />

for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> County <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> New York, Genesee<br />

County, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 10–8071. Anthony James Moore, Petitioner v. North Dakota.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> North Dakota<br />

dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this<br />

<strong>Court</strong>’s process, <strong>the</strong> Clerk is directed not to accept any fur<strong>the</strong>r petitions<br />

in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless <strong>the</strong> docketing fee<br />

required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance<br />

with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District <strong>of</strong> Columbia <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals,<br />

506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).<br />

No. 10–8112. Lisa J. Gillard, Petitioner v. Board <strong>of</strong> Trustees <strong>of</strong> Community<br />

College District No. 508. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Seventh Circuit dismissed.<br />

See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 10–8158. Raul Villavicencio-Burruel, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>.<br />

Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration<br />

or decision <strong>of</strong> this petition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!