24.12.2012 Views

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

318 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, <strong>2010</strong><br />

oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.<br />

Justice Sotomayor took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong><br />

this motion.<br />

No. 09–1036. David L. Henderson, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki,<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> Veterans Affairs. Motion <strong>of</strong> Doretha H. Henderson, <strong>the</strong><br />

authorized representative <strong>of</strong> David L. Henderson, to be substituted as<br />

petitioner granted. Justice Kagan took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> this motion.<br />

No. 09–1233. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor <strong>of</strong> California, et al.,<br />

Appellants v. Marciano Plata, et al. Motion <strong>of</strong> appellees for divided<br />

argument denied. An additional ten minutes are allotted to each side<br />

for oral argument.<br />

No. 09–1272. Kentucky, Petitioner v. Hollis Deshaun King. Motion <strong>of</strong><br />

respondent to dismiss <strong>the</strong> writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari as improvidently granted<br />

denied.<br />

No. 09–6822. Jason Pepper, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. Motion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Acting Solicitor for divided argument granted. Justice Kagan took<br />

no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> this motion.<br />

No. 10–5070. Ronald G. Dandar, Petitioner v. Mark Krysevig, et al.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for reconsideration <strong>of</strong> order denying leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 10–5221. Teresa Zerilli-Edelglass, Petitioner v. New York City<br />

Transit, et al. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for reconsideration <strong>of</strong> order denying<br />

leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Justice Sotomayor took no<br />

part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> this motion.<br />

No. 10–5567. Sharon Murray, Petitioner v. AT&T Mobility LLC. Motion<br />

<strong>of</strong> petitioner for reconsideration <strong>of</strong> order denying leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 10–6318. Robert Leon Strickland, Jr., Petitioner v. J. Frank<br />

Baker, et al. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied. Petitioner allowed until December 6, <strong>2010</strong>, within which<br />

to pay <strong>the</strong> docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition<br />

in compliance with Rule 33.1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rules <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Court</strong>.<br />

No. 10–6471. Eugene Miller, Petitioner v. John Lewis Marks, Jr.,<br />

Judge, Circuit <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> West Virginia, 15th Judicial Circuit, et al. Motion<br />

<strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner<br />

allowed until December 6, <strong>2010</strong>, within which to pay <strong>the</strong> docketing<br />

fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance<br />

with Rule 33.1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rules <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Court</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!