24.12.2012 Views

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October Term 2010 - Supreme Court of the United States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, <strong>2010</strong><br />

and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> Eighth Circuit dismissed. See<br />

Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 10–5330. Mark Garraway, Petitioner v. William Lee, Superintendent,<br />

Green Haven Correctional Facility. Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari<br />

to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Second Circuit<br />

denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision<br />

<strong>of</strong> this petition.<br />

No. 10–5345. Donald Ray McCray, Petitioner v. Clerk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Court</strong>.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied,<br />

and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals <strong>of</strong> Texas,<br />

Fifth District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly<br />

abused this <strong>Court</strong>’s process, <strong>the</strong> Clerk is directed not to accept any<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless <strong>the</strong><br />

docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in<br />

compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District <strong>of</strong> Columbia <strong>Court</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).<br />

No. 10–5349. Ruby Spencer, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> Parcel Service, Inc.<br />

Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in <strong>the</strong><br />

consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> this petition.<br />

No. 10–5365. Gerard D. Grandoit, Petitioner v. Benjamin J. Gilson,<br />

et al. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied,<br />

and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Appeals for <strong>the</strong> First Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 10–5385. Michael T. Stevens, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. Petition<br />

for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration<br />

or decision <strong>of</strong> this petition.<br />

No. 10–5393. Shawn Peterkin, aka Shawn James, Petitioner v.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no<br />

part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> this petition.<br />

No. 10–5445. Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, et vir, Petitioners v. Connecticut.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> Appellate <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Connecticut dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly<br />

abused this <strong>Court</strong>’s process, <strong>the</strong> Clerk is directed not to accept any<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless <strong>the</strong><br />

docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!