26.12.2012 Views

Diacylglycerol Signaling

Diacylglycerol Signaling

Diacylglycerol Signaling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 P.M. Blumberg et al.<br />

3.20 Conclusion<br />

Reflecting their central role in cellular control, the families of signaling proteins<br />

that integrate the information from the varying levels of DAG with that of other<br />

second messengers and signaling pathways provide attractive opportunities for<br />

drug development. Although cancer represents a major therapeutic target for these<br />

proteins, their impact is as diverse as the underlying biology that they mediate<br />

(DiazGranados and Zarate 2008; Chen and LaCasce 2008; Lee et al. 2008; Sun and<br />

Alkon 2006; Churchill et al. 2008; Dempsey et al. 2007; Farhadi et al. 2006).<br />

Because of the limited factors influencing specificity, largely encompassed by the<br />

geometry of the catalytic site, kinase inhibitors represent one productive approach<br />

for the PKCs and PKDs. The appreciably greater complexity of the C1 domain in<br />

the context of the cellular environment poses a correspondingly greater challenge<br />

for rational drug design. On the other hand, this complexity potentially provides the<br />

basis for a level of specificity beyond that achievable with catalytic site inhibitors.<br />

Moreover, the reality that only two of the classes of DAG receptors are protein<br />

kinases means that standard strategies of enzymatic inhibitor design are not even available<br />

for most of these other classes of targets. A critical theme in drug design is<br />

that of whether a target is “druggable.” Here, the power of natural products asserts<br />

itself. We know that the C1 domain is a druggable target because natural products,<br />

designed by nature and acting through C1 domains, are in clinical trials. The challenge<br />

is to build on this opportunity.<br />

Acknowledgments This contribution was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the<br />

NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.<br />

References<br />

Acs, P., Bögi, K., Lorenzo, P. S., Marquez, V. E., Biro, T., Szallasi, Z., et al. (1997). The catalytic<br />

domain of protein kinase C chimeras modulates the affinity and targeting of phorbol esterinduced<br />

translocation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 22148–22153.<br />

Adolf, W., Chanai, S., & Hecker, E. (1983). 3-O-angeloylingenol, the toxic and skin irritant factor<br />

from latex of Euphorbia antiquorum L. (Euphorbiaceae) and from a derived Thai purgative<br />

and anthelimintic (vermifuge) drug. Journal of the Science Society of Thailand, 9, 81–88.<br />

Ananthanarayanan, B., Stahelin, R. V., Digman, M. A., & Cho, W. (2003). Activation mechanisms<br />

of conventional protein kinaseC isoforms are determined by the ligand affinity and conformational<br />

flexibility of their C1 domains. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278,<br />

46886–468894.<br />

Asiedu, C., Biggs, J., Lilly, M., & Kraft, A. S. (1995). Inhibition of leukemia cell growth by the<br />

protein kinase C activator bryostatin correlates with the dephosphorylation of cyclindependent<br />

kinase 2. Cancer Research, 55, 3716–3720.<br />

Aziz, M. H., Manoharan, H. T., Sand, J. M., & Verma, A. K. (2007). Protein kinase Cepsilon<br />

interacts with Stat3 and regulates its activation that is essential for the development of skin<br />

cancer. Molecular Carcinogenesis, 46, 646–653.<br />

Battaini, F., & Mochly-Rosen, D. (2007). Happy birthday protein kinase C: Past, present and<br />

future of a superfamily. Pharmacological Research, 56, 461–466.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!