26.12.2012 Views

Diacylglycerol Signaling

Diacylglycerol Signaling

Diacylglycerol Signaling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Phorbol Esters and <strong>Diacylglycerol</strong>: The PKC Activators<br />

show strong dependence on phosphatidylserine, whereas PKCe and PKCg do not<br />

(Medkova and Cho 1998; Ananthanarayanan et al. 2003; Stahelin et al. 2004).<br />

PKCh is uniquely responsive to cholesterol sulfate (Ikuta et al. 1994). Likewise,<br />

different phospholipid compositions cause different structure activity relations<br />

for different DAG receptors, shifting the relative potencies of ligands. Thus, higher<br />

negative phospholipid compositions favored PDBu binding to PKCa, whereas a<br />

low negative phospholipid composition favored the binding to RasGRP (Lorenzo<br />

et al. 2000).<br />

The concept of the hydrophobic switch makes the strong prediction that ligand<br />

binding and receptor activation are coupled to the energy constraints of the overall<br />

conformational change induced by the switching mechanism. All mechanisms that<br />

hold the receptor in either an open or closed conformation will thus facilitate or<br />

impede the binding and the coupled conformational change associated with the<br />

hydrophobic switching. A powerful illustration of this principle is provided by<br />

chimeras prepared between different PKC isoforms (Acs et al. 1997). Phorbol<br />

ester induced translocation of the (C1 domain containing) regulatory domain of<br />

PKCa with 30-fold greater potency when this domain was coupled to the catalytic<br />

domain of PKCe in lieu of the normal PKCa catalytic domain. In addition, since the<br />

different classes of DAG receptors presumably have differential conformational<br />

consequences linked to this switching mechanism, it would thus be expected<br />

that they would have different dependence on the different components of the<br />

cellular environment.<br />

3.10 Different Functional Roles for the C1 Domain<br />

as a Hydrophobic Switch<br />

The C1 domain functioning as a hydrophobic switch responsive to ligand binding<br />

may have two distinct consequences. The more general consequence is that it<br />

stabilizes association of the DAG receptor at hydrophobic surfaces, typically at<br />

cellular membranes. In the case of the PKCs, this membrane association is also<br />

associated with stabilization of an unfolded conformation of the enzyme, leading to<br />

extraction of the pseudosubstrate region from the catalytic site and enzyme activation.<br />

In the case of PKD, in contrast, enzymatic activation is a consequence of<br />

phosphorylation, typically by PKC, and the role of the C1 domain is for membrane<br />

association of the activated enzyme (Wang 2006). Since it is known that PKC<br />

isoforms such as PKCd can be activated by tyrosine phosphorylation downstream<br />

of oxidative stress (Kikkawa et al. 2002; Steinberg 2008), it is plausible in such<br />

cases that C1 ligands under such conditions might again be influential for localization<br />

of the enzyme but no longer for its enzymatic activity.<br />

Nonetheless, absolute enzymatic activity is not the most relevant parameter for<br />

determining biological consequences. For PKC or PKD, the ability to phosphorylate<br />

downstream targets will depend not only on the intrinsic activity of the enzyme<br />

but also on the concentration of its substrate, which in turn will be determined by<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!