01.11.2022 Views

VBJ November 22 Online

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL<br />

12 www.TheValleyBusinessJournal.com<br />

<strong>November</strong> 20<strong>22</strong><br />

Employees May Now Take 12 Weeks California Family Rights Act Leave<br />

to Care for a Designated Person<br />

By Donald W. Hitzeman, Esq.<br />

On September 29, 20<strong>22</strong>, Governor<br />

Gavin Newson signed AB 1041,<br />

expanding an employee’s right to take<br />

up to 12 weeks of protected unpaid<br />

leave from work to care for a person<br />

designated by the employee, starting<br />

January 1, 2023.<br />

The California Family Rights Act,<br />

originally enacted in 1993, was amended<br />

in 2020 to expand the definition of<br />

employer to those employing five or<br />

more employees, effective January<br />

1, 2021.<br />

The CFRA makes it an unlawful<br />

employment practice for a California<br />

employer with five or more employees<br />

to refuse to grant a request from<br />

an employee who meets specified<br />

requirements to take up to a total of<br />

12 workweeks of protected leave from<br />

work in any 12-month period to care<br />

for their own medical condition or that<br />

of a family member.<br />

During this leave period, an employee<br />

could be required to use Paid<br />

Family Leave benefits, sick leave for<br />

their own condition, or accrued vacation<br />

pay, while the employer is required<br />

to continue to pay for the employer<br />

portion of any group medical insurance<br />

benefit.<br />

As of January 1, 2023, this latest<br />

legislation expands the class of people<br />

for whom an employee may take CFRA<br />

leave to care for to include a designated<br />

person. Government Code section<br />

12945.2 defines “designated person” to<br />

mean: “any individual related by blood or<br />

whose association with the employee is<br />

the equivalent of a family relationship.”<br />

The employee is permitted to identify<br />

the designated person at the time<br />

the employee requests the leave. Interestingly,<br />

the changes to the law do not<br />

define what is meant by “the equivalent<br />

of a family relationship,” so there may<br />

be some level of subjectivity and even<br />

confusion created by this ambiguity until<br />

either the legislature or the courts further<br />

define this term.<br />

The law allows an employer to limit<br />

an employee to one designated person per<br />

12-month period for CFRA family care<br />

and medical leave. Preferably, this should<br />

be done in writing before leaves under<br />

the CFRA are requested. At the very<br />

least, however, this limitation should be<br />

put in writing to an employee requesting<br />

this leave when the designated person<br />

is identified by the employee when requesting<br />

leave. Employers would do well<br />

to amend their employee handbook to<br />

include this limitation, or at least put out<br />

a written policy to employees outlining<br />

the limitation.<br />

The author, Donald W. Hitzeman,<br />

a shareholder with Reid & Hellyer, A<br />

Professional Corporation, is an experienced<br />

Business Law Litigator and<br />

Transactional Attorney. He has over<br />

38 years of legal experience, including<br />

advising business owners and operators<br />

on employment issues, as well as general<br />

business litigation, transactional matters<br />

and estate planning. He may be reached<br />

at his Murrieta office at (951)695-8700<br />

or dhitzeman@rhlaw.com.<br />

“<br />

Employers would do<br />

well to amend their<br />

employee handbook<br />

to include this limitation,<br />

or at least put<br />

out a written policy to<br />

employees outlining<br />

the limitation.<br />

Don Hitzeman

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!