06.12.2022 Views

Credit Management December 2022

THE CICM MAGAZINE FOR CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT PROFESSIONALS

THE CICM MAGAZINE FOR CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT PROFESSIONALS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONSUMER CREDIT

AUTHOR – Sean Feast FCICM

“In many respects, and notwithstanding the areas of ambiguity, our markets

are well placed already to apply the Consumer Duty”

– Henry Aitchison, Head of Policy at the Credit Services Association

believes its own approach achieves a better

outcome. Due diligence in the purchase

of portfolios will be largely unchanged,

but the Consumer Duty should in theory

make that slightly easier by requiring

vendors to provide adequate information

– an incremental improvement. Other

aspects will be entirely new, such as

not merely tracking whether a customer

was referred to debt advice but what

the outcome of that referral and that

advice was. How those affect markets or

competition are as yet unclear.”

and a solid Quality Assurance model, so

the practical impact on Ardent will be

minimal,” he explains.

“A number of policy items/governance

documents and objectives mapping tools

are being updated and enhanced together

with more detailed compliance checks

and records of specific ‘validations’

although as a DCA we don’t of course

actually offer any ‘retail’ goods or services.

Our main focus remains ‘clear and not

misleading communications and NOT

exploiting a lack of understanding’.

So how will the new duty affect the

marketplace? Will it increase competition?

Henry thinks it is still too early to tell:

“There will be an element of seeing what

the impact is in client sectors before

forming a view of how that might translate

into influencing debt purchase and

collection markets. In many respects, and

notwithstanding the areas of ambiguity,

our markets are well placed already to

apply the Consumer Duty,” he says.

“Some challenges can be expected to be

largely unchanged, such as different client

demands or managing the tension between

those and situations where the debt collector

Cost implications

Debbie Nolan thinks that one of the

impacts could be the additional cost: “I

don’t want to label this as just another

compliance exercise – it’s not just ‘TCF+’

or an enhanced set of ‘tick-boxes’ to

complete, this is all about how a firm’s

culture and values stack up and how

everyone in that firm believes in treating

customers and helping them deal with

their financial difficulties. But I think for

some firms that have work to do in this

area, there will be a cost to bear.

“One of the FCA’s key goals is to maintain

a competitive marketplace – if the cost of

achieving the standards expected by the

regulator are perceived to be too high,

some products may be withdrawn from

the market and that may not benefit the

consumer. In time, however this initiative

should improve competition as customers

will recognise those suppliers that provide

the very best service to consumers – I’m

sure the FCA is trying to generate a ‘race

to the top’ and that can’t be a bad thing for

the consumer.”

Kevin Blake agrees: “It will certainly

raise standards both in respect of the

way our clients expect us to operate and

in turn we shall enhance the diligence

processes associated with portfolio

purchases. By getting it right, this can

create a competitive advantage in the eyes

of our clients as well as ensuring financial

objectives of our customers are met and

thereby making credit work better for all.

“Anything which raises standards

in the sector does, by its very nature,

increase competition but like many

regulatory changes it is likely to come

at an incremental cost which could

cause challenges in some parts of

our marketplace.”

Brave | Curious | Resilient / www.cicm.com / December 2022 / PAGE 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!