03.01.2023 Views

Westside Messenger - December 25th, 2022

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PAGE 6 - WESTSIDE MESSENGER - <strong>December</strong> 25, <strong>2022</strong><br />

Dave Dobos<br />

STATE REPRESENTATIVE<br />

Ohio<br />

House<br />

Committees<br />

The committee structure of the Ohio House of<br />

Representatives is where the bulk of the legislative<br />

work gets completed. When a bill is introduced,<br />

it is referred to the committee that deals<br />

with its particular subject matter. It is discussed<br />

publicly by House members. Interested parties<br />

will testify about the pros and cons of the proposal<br />

so that House members understand better<br />

its effects and ramifications. Often times, it will be<br />

modified to accommodate the concerns brought<br />

forward in the hearings. If it is voted out of committee,<br />

it then can be considered by the entire<br />

House chamber. Should it get approved by the<br />

House, it is then referred to the Ohio Senate,<br />

where it undergoes a similar process. Only once<br />

a bill gains the approval of both legislative chambers<br />

can it get considered by the Governor for his<br />

approval.<br />

There will be 24 committees in the House in the<br />

135th General Assembly. The committees are as<br />

follows:<br />

Agriculture & Conservation<br />

Armed Services & Veterans Affairs<br />

Behavioral Health & Recovery Supports<br />

Civil justice<br />

Criminal Justice<br />

Economic & Workforce Development<br />

Elections & Apportionment<br />

Energy & Natural Resources<br />

Families, Aging, & Human Services<br />

Finance<br />

Financial Institutions<br />

Government Oversight<br />

Health<br />

Higher Education & Career Readiness<br />

Infrastructure & Rural Development<br />

Insurance<br />

Labor, Commerce, & Pensions<br />

Primary & Secondary Education<br />

Public Safety, Corrections, & State Security<br />

Public Utilities<br />

State & Local Government<br />

Technology & Innovation<br />

Transportation<br />

Ways & Means<br />

House members will get assigned to committees<br />

at the beginning of the General Assembly in early<br />

January. Members are designating their preferences<br />

to the new House leadership. I have identified<br />

three House committees that I feel will enable<br />

me to contribute the most for our district: Finance,<br />

Technology & Innovation, and Primary &<br />

Secondary Education. Alternatively, there are<br />

three additional committees with which I feel I<br />

can be helpful: Economic & Workforce Development,<br />

Higher Education & Career Readiness, and<br />

Ways & Means. The Speaker determines, based on<br />

his assessment of a member’s expertise, experience,<br />

and priorities and the needs of the entire<br />

chamber, who will serve on each committee.<br />

(Dave Dobos represents the new Ohio House of<br />

Representatives 10th District, which consists of<br />

most of the west and southwest sides of Columbus,<br />

parts of the south side of Columbus, Grove<br />

City, Urbancrest, and Franklin Township. He reports<br />

to us regularly via this column, which is paid<br />

for by Dobos for Ohio.)<br />

Paid Advertisement<br />

It has been more than a decade since<br />

director James Cameron released his science<br />

fiction epic “Avatar” and the question<br />

that has most often arisen throughout this<br />

duration of time is whether it has any relevance<br />

within the public sphere. Despite<br />

fact-based evidence that it became the<br />

highest-grossing box office hit of all time,<br />

revolutionized the way computer graphic<br />

imagery was used within the entertainment<br />

industry, and somehow made people<br />

believe that 3D television was the way of<br />

the future, film critics and pop culture commentators<br />

alike came to the consensus that<br />

“Avatar” was but a blip on the radar of the<br />

zeitgeist, having little to no cultural impact<br />

on the hearts and minds of the masses.<br />

As this entertaining, albeit rather pointless,<br />

debate was taking place, Cameron<br />

was steadily toiling away, stating his<br />

intention to make not just one sequel to<br />

“Avatar” but four additional movies within<br />

this universe as well. The caveat, however,<br />

was that none of them would be filmed<br />

until he believed that visual effect technology<br />

had caught up to the vision he had in<br />

his head for the world of his creation.<br />

When the announcement came nearly<br />

five years ago that he would officially<br />

return to Pandora, film critics and pop culture<br />

commentators across the country<br />

began to once again question whether anyone<br />

would even care to revisit the lush<br />

world that featured nine-foot tall blue catlike<br />

natives clashing with humans as they<br />

tried to strip mine their planet for<br />

resources. Most believed that no one would<br />

care to revisit that place, that it was a<br />

waste of money, and that the public had<br />

moved far away from this world and turned<br />

to things such as the Marvel Cinematic<br />

Universe, the streaming revolution, and all<br />

other kinds of entertainment gamechanges.<br />

What they seemed to have forgotten,<br />

along with all that fact-based evidence presented<br />

in the first paragraph, was that<br />

“Avatar” created a quiet yet hardcore fanbase<br />

that had people trying to learn the fictionalized<br />

language of the native Pandoran<br />

tribe, making hundreds of trips down to<br />

Disney World to experience the related<br />

attraction, and plunking down even more<br />

money in this economy to see the original<br />

film when it came back to theaters earlier<br />

this fall. (Note: it even beat new theatrical<br />

releases.) But perhaps the most egregious<br />

oversight from those wondering whether<br />

people would pay to see this sequel, or any<br />

sequel thereafter, was that it was helmed<br />

by Cameron. Say what you want about<br />

him, but there is no questioning the sheer<br />

spectacle of his movies. And if there is anything<br />

the public wants to see, it is a visual<br />

spectacle to the likes of which they have<br />

not seen before on the silver screen.<br />

Ultimately, this is what “Avatar: The<br />

Way of Water” offers to the public: A<br />

chance to be immersed in a lush new world<br />

that is full of wonder, danger, and unimaginable<br />

beauty. Describing this film can<br />

sometimes come across like you are blowing<br />

smoke up the tush, but in its 3D state<br />

it is one of the most visually dazzling<br />

movies to ever come on the big screen. The<br />

picture is crisper, the technology more<br />

advanced, and the motion-capture aspect<br />

has improved by leaps and bounds from the<br />

original film.<br />

With all of that said, however, this film<br />

also displays some of Cameron’s worse<br />

traits, such as his flair for reminding people<br />

that he is responsible for some of the<br />

greatest movies of all time, his propensity<br />

to use the same words repeatedly, and his<br />

lack of detail to the story that is currently<br />

being told. He seems to forget that the<br />

audience wants answers to the questions<br />

that was raised in the first film, that they<br />

want answers to some of the questions that<br />

are bubbling forth in the second, and that<br />

they do not necessarily want to wait for all<br />

the answers to be given to them in the slow<br />

roll out of this franchise. My theory is that<br />

either he does not care about answering<br />

them as some threads left in the first film<br />

were cut completely out of the second or he<br />

feels secure in the relevancy of his world,<br />

positive that the masses will come out to<br />

see his vision regardless of his fast and<br />

loose approach with the storylines. Sadly,<br />

he is not mistaken as I know I am a part of<br />

that segment that will come out and see it<br />

because I do love this world that this maddening<br />

man has created.<br />

The sequel is set nearly two decades<br />

after the events of the first film where we<br />

find former Marine Jake Sully (Sam<br />

Worthington), now fully transported into<br />

his Na’vi avatar, living his best life with<br />

his fierce warrior wife Neytiri (Zoe<br />

Saldana) by his side. Over the years, the<br />

pair has welcomed three biological children<br />

— eldest son Neteyam (Jamie Flatters), second-oldest<br />

son Lo’ak (Britain Dalton), and<br />

youngest daughter Tuk (Trinity Jo-Li<br />

Bliss) — and have helped raised two other<br />

children, the Na’vi-human hybrid Kiri<br />

(Sigourney Weaver) and the humanhuman<br />

Miles (Jack Champion) who was<br />

left behind when Jake and the Na’vi banded<br />

together to boot the humans back to<br />

whatever remained of the world they had<br />

mined to near death.<br />

Content with their growing family —<br />

although the attitudes now coursing<br />

through their teenagers are causing some<br />

strife — their happiness abruptly ends<br />

when the humans (aka Sky People) come<br />

back with a vengeance with several ninefoot<br />

tall Na’vi clones who were implanted<br />

with the memories of the military men and<br />

women who were killed near the end of the<br />

first feature in tow.<br />

Uninspiring twist aside, these scenes<br />

are particularly affecting as it showcases<br />

the harm humans can do to other worlds in<br />

the name of advancement. It also serves to<br />

propel the story to another part of Pandora<br />

as Jake and the Sully clan flee from the<br />

www.columbusmessenger.com<br />

In Entertainment<br />

Welcome to the wonderful world of James Cameron<br />

The Reel Deal<br />

Dedra Cordle<br />

clones now hell-bent<br />

on their destruction.<br />

And what a new<br />

world the place they<br />

land is.<br />

After finding<br />

refuge with the<br />

Matkayina, a water<br />

tribe, the Sully family set out to explore<br />

their new home nestled on the shores of the<br />

ocean, meeting all sorts of fantastic beasts<br />

along the way. Cameron spends much of<br />

the 192-minute run time playing within<br />

these surroundings, letting the audience<br />

get to know the new generation of the Sully<br />

children as they bond with majestic ocean<br />

animals and members of the new clan.<br />

Although it can seem indulgent at times,<br />

as if we are playing in his own personal<br />

bathtub full of his toys, the underwater<br />

scenes are quite breathtaking to experience.<br />

Less thrilling, however, is the written<br />

story within this film, which is really just a<br />

retread of the previous film minus the mineral<br />

that could have saved Earth. While<br />

the sequel certainly has more depth than<br />

its predecessor as the stakes are higher<br />

with children at play now, some of the justifications<br />

for the military Na’vi clones setting<br />

off around the Pandoran world just to<br />

fight Jake and his family is nonsensical at<br />

times. But that is the risk one takes when<br />

it comes to movies that are directed and<br />

written by Cameron — more attention is<br />

paid to the visual details rather than the<br />

spoken word and its story. Individually,<br />

they can be a powerful way to move a story,<br />

to move an audience, but if they are created<br />

together in harmony within a film it can<br />

be even more affecting to the mind and<br />

heart of the masses. That unfortunately is<br />

not the case with “Avatar: The Way of<br />

Water,” raising questions once again about<br />

its cultural relevance but it will still leave<br />

quite an impression with its ability to captivate<br />

the senses through its visual storytelling<br />

prowess.<br />

Grade<br />

Visually: A+, Story: B-<br />

Dedra Cordle is a <strong>Messenger</strong> staff<br />

writer and columnist.<br />

westside<br />

<strong>Messenger</strong><br />

(Distribution: 5,000)<br />

Andrea Cordle...................................<strong>Westside</strong> Editor<br />

westside@ columbusmessenger.com<br />

Published every other Sunday by the<br />

The Columbus <strong>Messenger</strong> Co.<br />

3500 Sullivant Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43204-1887<br />

(614) 272-5422

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!