Lumsden and Area Aquatic Facility Proposal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusion<br />
An aquatic facility would be a viable <strong>and</strong> positive option for the Town of <strong>Lumsden</strong> <strong>and</strong> surrounding area.<br />
There are many benefits it would provide to the community. <strong>Lumsden</strong> has a excellent track record for<br />
fundraising <strong>and</strong> successful implementation of projects like this. There is a strong volunteer base<br />
available <strong>and</strong> public sentiment is favourable.<br />
Outdoor pools are most common for communities this size <strong>and</strong> capital <strong>and</strong> operational budgets are<br />
attainable. An indoor pool, while less common, offers added benefits of year-round use <strong>and</strong> provides<br />
valuable indoor space for physical activity in the dead of winter. An indoor pool has high operating costs<br />
<strong>and</strong> would be difficult to fund through taxation alone. If a strong sentiment from the public exists to<br />
build an indoor facility, the fundraising load increases <strong>and</strong> an alternate business model would need to be<br />
considered to make it sustainable long- term.<br />
It was clear that any decisions surrounding a community pool would need to consider multiple factors<br />
including future development, future recreational facilities, <strong>and</strong> interdependancies. Integrating this<br />
information into a Parks <strong>and</strong> Recreation Master Plan is critical to ensure everything is considered <strong>and</strong><br />
decisions are made based on the long term. With this in mind the research conducted by this<br />
committee supported proceeding to the next steps for building a community pool.<br />
Process<br />
Stage Gate Approvals:<br />
Approval for<br />
Consultant<br />
Approval to<br />
Procure<br />
Approval to<br />
Construct<br />
Initiation<br />
Community<br />
Need<br />
Initial Survey<br />
Feasibility<br />
Research<br />
alternatives<br />
Identify<br />
probable costs<br />
Location<br />
Criteria<br />
Funding<br />
Partners<br />
Community Engagement<br />
Parks <strong>and</strong> Rec<br />
Master Plan<br />
Community<br />
Workshop<br />
Location<br />
Selection<br />
Design<br />
Procurement<br />
Best value<br />
procurement<br />
(RFP)<br />
Design-Build<br />
Local vendor<br />
engagement<br />
Construction<br />
50% funds<br />
raised<br />
Timeline: 6 Months 6 Months 18-24 Months<br />
Next Steps<br />
Its critical to conduct community enagement activites to ensure buy-in <strong>and</strong> acceptance of the project<br />
moving forwards. A third-party consultant is the best option to facilitate this process which can include:<br />
• Workshops <strong>and</strong> Surveys<br />
• Finalize location <strong>and</strong> design requirements<br />
• Key stakeholder engagement (service organizations, schools, surrounding communities,<br />
government)<br />
• Integrated Parks <strong>and</strong> Recreation Master Plan<br />
• <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> Detailed <strong>Proposal</strong><br />
<strong>Lumsden</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Proposal</strong> Report | 23