20.03.2023 Views

Lumsden and Area Aquatic Facility Proposal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion<br />

An aquatic facility would be a viable <strong>and</strong> positive option for the Town of <strong>Lumsden</strong> <strong>and</strong> surrounding area.<br />

There are many benefits it would provide to the community. <strong>Lumsden</strong> has a excellent track record for<br />

fundraising <strong>and</strong> successful implementation of projects like this. There is a strong volunteer base<br />

available <strong>and</strong> public sentiment is favourable.<br />

Outdoor pools are most common for communities this size <strong>and</strong> capital <strong>and</strong> operational budgets are<br />

attainable. An indoor pool, while less common, offers added benefits of year-round use <strong>and</strong> provides<br />

valuable indoor space for physical activity in the dead of winter. An indoor pool has high operating costs<br />

<strong>and</strong> would be difficult to fund through taxation alone. If a strong sentiment from the public exists to<br />

build an indoor facility, the fundraising load increases <strong>and</strong> an alternate business model would need to be<br />

considered to make it sustainable long- term.<br />

It was clear that any decisions surrounding a community pool would need to consider multiple factors<br />

including future development, future recreational facilities, <strong>and</strong> interdependancies. Integrating this<br />

information into a Parks <strong>and</strong> Recreation Master Plan is critical to ensure everything is considered <strong>and</strong><br />

decisions are made based on the long term. With this in mind the research conducted by this<br />

committee supported proceeding to the next steps for building a community pool.<br />

Process<br />

Stage Gate Approvals:<br />

Approval for<br />

Consultant<br />

Approval to<br />

Procure<br />

Approval to<br />

Construct<br />

Initiation<br />

Community<br />

Need<br />

Initial Survey<br />

Feasibility<br />

Research<br />

alternatives<br />

Identify<br />

probable costs<br />

Location<br />

Criteria<br />

Funding<br />

Partners<br />

Community Engagement<br />

Parks <strong>and</strong> Rec<br />

Master Plan<br />

Community<br />

Workshop<br />

Location<br />

Selection<br />

Design<br />

Procurement<br />

Best value<br />

procurement<br />

(RFP)<br />

Design-Build<br />

Local vendor<br />

engagement<br />

Construction<br />

50% funds<br />

raised<br />

Timeline: 6 Months 6 Months 18-24 Months<br />

Next Steps<br />

Its critical to conduct community enagement activites to ensure buy-in <strong>and</strong> acceptance of the project<br />

moving forwards. A third-party consultant is the best option to facilitate this process which can include:<br />

• Workshops <strong>and</strong> Surveys<br />

• Finalize location <strong>and</strong> design requirements<br />

• Key stakeholder engagement (service organizations, schools, surrounding communities,<br />

government)<br />

• Integrated Parks <strong>and</strong> Recreation Master Plan<br />

• <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> Detailed <strong>Proposal</strong><br />

<strong>Lumsden</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Proposal</strong> Report | 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!