27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

286 Schreiber<br />

Rotation Rate [rad/s]<br />

10 -11<br />

10 -12<br />

10 -13<br />

10 1<br />

10 2<br />

10 3<br />

Time [s]<br />

Figure 5. Computed quantum noise limit <strong>and</strong> measured sensor resolution for G. The sensor<br />

almost reaches the shot noise limit.<br />

with a width of the cavity resonance of<br />

10 4<br />

10 5<br />

1 − R<br />

∆νc = ∆FSR<br />

π √ . (5)<br />

R<br />

Using ∆FSR = c/L = 18.75 MHz <strong>and</strong> R = 0.999892 one obtains ∆νc ≈ 645 Hz <strong>and</strong><br />

hence ∆νL ≈ 275 µHz. Since a He-Ne laser is a 4-level system one may expect to<br />

set N1 ≈ 0 which assumes full inversion. For an industry type He-Ne laser with a<br />

capillary diameter of 1-2 mm <strong>and</strong> a moderate excitation current this assumption is<br />

certainly true. However, our lasers use wider capillaries with 4 mm (C-II), 5 mm (G)<br />

<strong>and</strong> 6 mm (UG2) diameter. This slows down the wall-collision induced de-excitation<br />

of the Neon atoms from the 1s state. As a result the laser gain reduces substantially<br />

<strong>and</strong>, by the process of electron-Neon collision, pumping leads to a an increase of N1,<br />

a reduction of the inversion [3, 16], <strong>and</strong> consequently to an increased linewidth. In<br />

the absence of any variations of the scaling factor according to Eq. (3) one obtains a<br />

constant lower limit for the gyro resolution, which then is only depending on fluctuations<br />

of the laser beam power in the cavity. A typical value for the stability of the<br />

beam power due to mode competition of 0.01% over a time period of about 1 hour<br />

has been observed from intensity measurements in G.<br />

In order to investigate the mid-term stability of large ring lasers, Fig. 6 shows an<br />

Allan deviation plot of most of the lasers specified in Table 1. One can see that the<br />

monolithic constructions are more stable than the heterolithic structures. This is<br />

not unexpected. Compared to UG1, C-II experiences much more perturbations from<br />

backscattering <strong>and</strong> comes with a much smaller scale factor. The performance of UG2<br />

on the other side falls off despite the enhanced scale factor. This may be due to the<br />

rectangular sensor layout or comes with the increased arm length of the instrument.<br />

G0 as the only vertically mounted ring laser does not have the mechanical stability<br />

to perform well. Actually this prototype ring laser construction was only intended<br />

to test the feasibility of heterolithic ring laser designs. The GEOsensor is designed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!