27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Specific signal types in hearing research 57<br />

• Role of masker fluctuations in off-frequency masking.<br />

• Influence of the intrinsic envelope fluctuations of a noise on modulation detection.<br />

• Effects of masker-signal phase relation in monaural <strong>and</strong> binaural on-frequency<br />

masking.<br />

The spectral selectivity of the auditory system is often studied by using narrowb<strong>and</strong><br />

maskers [42]. A problem for the interpretation of masking data arises, when, due to<br />

the use of tonal masker, distortion products or temporal cues like beats influence the<br />

detection process [43]. In order to avoid the introduction of such “false cues”, one<br />

often uses narrowb<strong>and</strong> noise maskers instead [44]. It is implicitely assumed that this<br />

substituion has no other effect than eliminating the mentioned artifacts.<br />

In a study by van der Heijden <strong>and</strong> Kohlrausch [45] this assumption underlying the<br />

power-spectrum model of masking [32,38] was tested for five different narrowb<strong>and</strong><br />

maskers with the same center frequency. The masker types were either a sinusoid, a<br />

Gaussian noise or a multiplied noise. The two noise signals had b<strong>and</strong>widths of either<br />

20 or 100 Hz. The five maskers thus differed in the amount of envelope variations: The<br />

sinuoid has a flat envelope, the two noises have envelopes with intrinsic fluctuations,<br />

with the multiplied noise having deeper envelope minima (see Sect. 3.2.2). The rate<br />

of fluctuation of the envelopes was another experimental parameter, because it is<br />

lower for the 20-Hz than for the 100-Hz masker.<br />

In the experiments, these maskers had a center frequency of 1.3 kHz <strong>and</strong> were used<br />

to mask a sinusoidal test signal at 2 kHz. The masker levels were varied between<br />

60 <strong>and</strong> 84 dB. Figure 13 shows the growth-of-masking functions for the five masker<br />

Figure 13. Simultaneous growth-of-masking<br />

functions measured with various narrow-b<strong>and</strong><br />

maskers centered at 1.3 kHz. The target was<br />

a 2-kHz tone. The five curves indicate the<br />

results for five different maskers: a sinusoid<br />

(open circles), a 100-Hz-wide Gaussian noise<br />

(filled squares), a 20-Hz-wide Gaussian noise<br />

(open squares), a 100-Hz-wide multiplied noise<br />

(filled triangles), <strong>and</strong> a 20-Hz-wide multiplied<br />

noise (open triangles). Data points measured<br />

with 20-Hz-wide maskers are connected with<br />

dashed lines. Averaged data of six subjects<br />

are plotted; error bars indicate ± one st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation across the values of the six subjects.<br />

Reused with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright<br />

1995, Acoustical Society of America.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!