27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Specific signal types in hearing research 53<br />

Figure 10. Masked thresholds for Gaussian noise (dashed lines) <strong>and</strong> low-noise noise maskers<br />

(solid lines) as a function of frequency offset between the masker <strong>and</strong> target. Squares show<br />

100-Hz wide maskers <strong>and</strong> circles 10-Hz wide maskers both presented at 70 dB SPL.<br />

center frequency. For low-noise noise (circles), however, we see a clear dependence of<br />

thresholds on the center frequency. Although low-noise noise thresholds were lower<br />

than Gaussian noise thresholds already at a center frequency of 1 kHz, for 10 kHz we<br />

see a much larger difference of more than 15 dB which is much more similar to the<br />

difference observed for sinusoidal <strong>and</strong> Gaussian noise maskers. The higher thresholds<br />

for lower frequencies are well in line with the idea that peripheral filtering affects the<br />

temporal envelope flatness of low-noise noise.<br />

A variant of the experiment by Kohlrausch et al. [34] investigated the effect of a<br />

frequency offset between masker <strong>and</strong> sinusoidal target signal with the target always<br />

higher in frequency than the masker [35]. The addition of the sinusoidal target to<br />

the masker b<strong>and</strong> creates modulations with a rate that is characterized by the frequency<br />

difference between target <strong>and</strong> masker. When the target is centered within<br />

the masker, the newly introduced modulations will have a rate comparable to those<br />

already present within the masker alone <strong>and</strong> will therefore be difficult to detect.<br />

When the target is sufficiently remote from the masker b<strong>and</strong>, the modulations that<br />

will be introduced due to addition of target will be of considerably higher rate than<br />

those already present within the masker <strong>and</strong> may be much easier to detect. There<br />

is evidence that the auditory system exhibits some frequency selectivity associated<br />

with the processing of temporal envelope fluctuations, which led to the modulation<br />

filterbank model proposed by Dau et al. [36].<br />

In Fig. 10 results of the experiment by van de Par <strong>and</strong> Kohlrausch [35] are shown.<br />

Thresholds for Gaussian noise (dashed lines) <strong>and</strong> low-noise noise (solid lines) maskers<br />

are shown centered at 10 kHz, for various target-to-masker frequency offsets <strong>and</strong> two<br />

masker b<strong>and</strong>widths. As can be seen for the squares showing the 100-Hz wide maskers,<br />

the low-noise noise thresholds (squares with solid lines) are roughly independent of<br />

frequency offset. The Gaussian noise thresholds for the same b<strong>and</strong>width (squares

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!