27.12.2012 Views

Fishing Vessel Monitoring Systems: Past, Present and Future

Fishing Vessel Monitoring Systems: Past, Present and Future

Fishing Vessel Monitoring Systems: Past, Present and Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VMS: <strong>Past</strong>, <strong>Present</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Future</strong> 26<br />

reference for maritime navigation in general, <strong>and</strong> VMS <strong>and</strong> other tracking<br />

applications in particular, in clear preference to GPS.<br />

4.6.1 Multiple service levels<br />

The Galileo system will offer three levels of service, all of which can be of interest<br />

to entities planning, <strong>and</strong> operating secure tracking systems. The most secure<br />

approaches will take advantage of the characteristics of each of the three levels<br />

of service proposed for the Galileo system: the open service, safety-of-life<br />

service, <strong>and</strong> commercial service. On each step of this ascending ladder, the<br />

level of security will become increasingly reliable. Indeed, at the level of<br />

commercial service, it may well be close to inviolable.<br />

The Galileo open service presents capabilities similar to those of GPS, albeit with<br />

the addition of a 250 bit-per-second channel that transmits system integrity data.<br />

Consequently, the integration of samples of this data into positions calculated<br />

with a Galileo receiver would provide a level of assurance that the position<br />

received is the result of a calculation using real Galileo signals.<br />

4.6.2 Levels of difficulty<br />

It should be pointed out that the security of such an approach would be less than<br />

total. This is because, theoretically, it would be possible to integrate data from<br />

the security channel into a simulated Galileo navigation signal. Still, as it would<br />

be necessary to do this in real time, generation of the falsified signal would<br />

require a much higher degree of difficulty, with corresponding increased costs<br />

<strong>and</strong> the ever-present possibility of making an error in transmission that would<br />

raise suspicions as to data integrity. In addition, proprietary signal processing by<br />

the terminal would further increase the complexity. In any case, such a system<br />

would be a significant improvement over what is currently available <strong>and</strong> would<br />

have the advantage of being based upon an openly available, free-of-charge<br />

service.<br />

With the safety-of-life service, <strong>and</strong> its characteristics that are Galileo specific,<br />

verification of the authenticity of retransmitted position data becomes more<br />

assured. It is beginning at this level that the Galileo integrity data channel is<br />

encrypted for decoding only by registered, identified users, thus making it a more<br />

solid platform for data verification. Position data based upon this encrypted<br />

signal, combined with the identity key of the user who has decrypted it, would<br />

provide a level of technical difficulty <strong>and</strong> cost orders of magnitude superior to the<br />

unencrypted signal of the open service.<br />

The Galileo commercial service provides a 500 bit-per-second communications<br />

channel from satellite to receiver that transmits user-defined data. There is one<br />

such channel per satellite, <strong>and</strong> it must be shared amongst users. The ability to<br />

transmit, for example, r<strong>and</strong>om data to users <strong>and</strong> to create position reports based

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!