Green Economy Journal Issue 60
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ENERGY<br />
ENERGY<br />
Supply chain<br />
resilience can<br />
PROPEL THE<br />
POWER SECTOR<br />
through the energy transition<br />
– and please investors in the process<br />
The power sector is on the verge of an existential transformation as it works to achieve a<br />
comprehensive energy transition. But it must do so while resuscitating ageing infrastructure,<br />
battling more severe and more frequent weather events, and defending against security threats<br />
(both cyber and physical).<br />
BY KEARNEY CONSULTING*<br />
Huge barriers could thwart progress if left unaddressed.<br />
Externally, critical materials and skilled workers are in<br />
short supply, and their costs are rising. Internally, utilities’<br />
traditionally rigid processes run counter to the agility they will<br />
need to build a resilient and reliable grid while being nimble<br />
enough to withstand supply chain shocks cost-effectively.<br />
Power companies that stick to the status quo won’t survive easily.<br />
The successful ones will fundamentally shift how their supply chain<br />
and procurement functions work to reserve more money to spend<br />
on transformation goals. Sourcing strategy will supersede pricing<br />
tactics. Targeted savings will replace rigid budgets. And both<br />
leadership and procurement will adopt what will seem like radical<br />
new sourcing and supplier options, even though, yes, we realise<br />
they have stringent technical qualifications.<br />
In short, to meet the expectations of investors, society and<br />
customers, power utilities will reimagine capital efficiency and make<br />
their supply chains truly resilient, reliable and agile. Several outside<br />
forces have led us to this point.<br />
persistent lack of transformers, many of which are manufactured<br />
overseas. Delivery times stretch to a year-plus and could be even<br />
longer if geopolitical tensions rise.<br />
Suppliers recognise the gap between demand and their supply<br />
of transformers, but even if they can increase production or bring<br />
it onshore, new facilities take time to build. Many shortages show<br />
no sign of letting up, with manufacturers struggling to fill orders<br />
during emergencies or cancelling them altogether (see figure 1).<br />
Lead times: transformers<br />
Lead times: electric cables<br />
FRED economic data; Kearney analysis<br />
Power transformer PPI (January 2019 through March 2023) 1<br />
Figure 2. Lead times only paint part of the picture. We also see equipment prices trending up significantly.<br />
1<br />
Similar overall trend for electric wires and cable costs (in other words, steady and sharp increase in prices<br />
that have remained elevated) since 2021.<br />
Increased demand has prices rising, too. Where a transformer’s<br />
price sat unchanged through 2020, it has risen 134% since then<br />
(see figure 2).<br />
Ageing infrastructure is another factor, as historical underinvestment<br />
in maintenance and modernisation catches up with current needs.<br />
Weak cables run short distances and transformers currently in place<br />
are, on average, five to 15 years older than their intended lifespan.<br />
And there are the ESG pressures that impact utilities. The growing<br />
demand for EVs and an interconnected grid to charge them means<br />
utilities will need even more infrastructure, including transformers,<br />
whose production capacity lags projected growth of the EV market<br />
(at a compound annual growth rate of 25%). ESG issues keep arising<br />
in the minds of the public and governments as well, with increasingly<br />
frequent natural disasters, from wildfires to heat waves straining<br />
the power system.<br />
These factors might have meant utilities could raise their rates to<br />
cover escalating costs to build the required infrastructure. But large<br />
rate increases during the past three years, ranging from 8% to 11% or<br />
more across residential, commercial and industrial customers don’t<br />
leave much room to gain revenue in this way now. 1<br />
THE RISKS OF TRADITION<br />
A recent Kearney survey revealed that just 27% of utilities have<br />
standard processes to identify and prioritise risks consistently across<br />
capital projects. 2<br />
When another natural disaster hits or an extensive replacement<br />
or upgrade project is urgently needed, does the utility have enough<br />
detailed insight into its supply and demand to prioritise projects? Can<br />
it shift quickly from one project to another as circumstances change?<br />
And during this process, does it know the impact on operations and<br />
earnings from spending rands in one place versus another, spending<br />
rands in the wrong place or not at all?<br />
The bottom line here<br />
is that utilities now<br />
require supply chains<br />
that are responsive,<br />
reliable and agile.<br />
We see utilities’ related risks falling into three categories:<br />
Demand planning. Without a clear understanding of supply and<br />
demand across a utility’s business areas, it is challenging to manage<br />
increasing or varied lead times for supply materials and equipment.<br />
Longer term, more precise demand planning can help determine<br />
time horizons. There’s also the shift to consider from reactionary<br />
to precautionary planning that takes a longer-term view beyond<br />
solely the next rate case.<br />
Supplier reliability. An optimal and reliable selection of suppliers<br />
can help overcome shortages and ensure a resilient supply chain. The<br />
transformer production process, for example, is highly dependent<br />
on raw materials, including copper, electric steel and aluminium.<br />
Even as commodity prices fluctuate, having suppliers that can lock in<br />
timely acquisition is crucial. Still, the current environment indicates<br />
that equipment availability and resource scarcity are significant<br />
challenges, and utilities have not yet fully fleshed out the solutions.<br />
Agile governance. With a complete picture of the supply and demand<br />
fields, a utility can shift from one area to another, anticipating required<br />
lead times. For instance, if there is a major delay in transformer<br />
replacement, an agile utility has enough data and resources to be<br />
able to shift investments to another upgrade project.<br />
Longer forecast periods (beyond the next rate increase) help<br />
utilities and their suppliers plan more effectively. The bottom line<br />
here is that utilities now require supply chains that are responsive,<br />
reliable and agile.<br />
THINK IN TERMS OF REINVENTION<br />
We believe supply will become even more challenging. The supplier<br />
base has shrunk, and the suppliers that remain are in the driver’s<br />
seat, able to pick and choose which utility they will prioritise.<br />
Without intervening in some way, utilities will simply not be able<br />
to secure enough supplies, such as transformers, for years to come.<br />
What pressures utility supply chains now<br />
Various factors make it difficult for utilities’ supply chains to operate<br />
efficiently and at full value. First, there’s the material shortage. A<br />
scarcity of crucial items, such as electric steel, electronic components<br />
and cable are disrupting supply. Utilities have acutely felt the<br />
Figure 1. Worringly, shortages of critical equipment and materials do not<br />
show signs of abatement.<br />
1 US Energy Information Administration and Kearney analysis<br />
2 Kearney ExCap III survey of utility companies<br />
22 23