28.09.2023 Views

Green Economy Journal Issue 60

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENERGY<br />

ENERGY<br />

Supply chain<br />

resilience can<br />

PROPEL THE<br />

POWER SECTOR<br />

through the energy transition<br />

– and please investors in the process<br />

The power sector is on the verge of an existential transformation as it works to achieve a<br />

comprehensive energy transition. But it must do so while resuscitating ageing infrastructure,<br />

battling more severe and more frequent weather events, and defending against security threats<br />

(both cyber and physical).<br />

BY KEARNEY CONSULTING*<br />

Huge barriers could thwart progress if left unaddressed.<br />

Externally, critical materials and skilled workers are in<br />

short supply, and their costs are rising. Internally, utilities’<br />

traditionally rigid processes run counter to the agility they will<br />

need to build a resilient and reliable grid while being nimble<br />

enough to withstand supply chain shocks cost-effectively.<br />

Power companies that stick to the status quo won’t survive easily.<br />

The successful ones will fundamentally shift how their supply chain<br />

and procurement functions work to reserve more money to spend<br />

on transformation goals. Sourcing strategy will supersede pricing<br />

tactics. Targeted savings will replace rigid budgets. And both<br />

leadership and procurement will adopt what will seem like radical<br />

new sourcing and supplier options, even though, yes, we realise<br />

they have stringent technical qualifications.<br />

In short, to meet the expectations of investors, society and<br />

customers, power utilities will reimagine capital efficiency and make<br />

their supply chains truly resilient, reliable and agile. Several outside<br />

forces have led us to this point.<br />

persistent lack of transformers, many of which are manufactured<br />

overseas. Delivery times stretch to a year-plus and could be even<br />

longer if geopolitical tensions rise.<br />

Suppliers recognise the gap between demand and their supply<br />

of transformers, but even if they can increase production or bring<br />

it onshore, new facilities take time to build. Many shortages show<br />

no sign of letting up, with manufacturers struggling to fill orders<br />

during emergencies or cancelling them altogether (see figure 1).<br />

Lead times: transformers<br />

Lead times: electric cables<br />

FRED economic data; Kearney analysis<br />

Power transformer PPI (January 2019 through March 2023) 1<br />

Figure 2. Lead times only paint part of the picture. We also see equipment prices trending up significantly.<br />

1<br />

Similar overall trend for electric wires and cable costs (in other words, steady and sharp increase in prices<br />

that have remained elevated) since 2021.<br />

Increased demand has prices rising, too. Where a transformer’s<br />

price sat unchanged through 2020, it has risen 134% since then<br />

(see figure 2).<br />

Ageing infrastructure is another factor, as historical underinvestment<br />

in maintenance and modernisation catches up with current needs.<br />

Weak cables run short distances and transformers currently in place<br />

are, on average, five to 15 years older than their intended lifespan.<br />

And there are the ESG pressures that impact utilities. The growing<br />

demand for EVs and an interconnected grid to charge them means<br />

utilities will need even more infrastructure, including transformers,<br />

whose production capacity lags projected growth of the EV market<br />

(at a compound annual growth rate of 25%). ESG issues keep arising<br />

in the minds of the public and governments as well, with increasingly<br />

frequent natural disasters, from wildfires to heat waves straining<br />

the power system.<br />

These factors might have meant utilities could raise their rates to<br />

cover escalating costs to build the required infrastructure. But large<br />

rate increases during the past three years, ranging from 8% to 11% or<br />

more across residential, commercial and industrial customers don’t<br />

leave much room to gain revenue in this way now. 1<br />

THE RISKS OF TRADITION<br />

A recent Kearney survey revealed that just 27% of utilities have<br />

standard processes to identify and prioritise risks consistently across<br />

capital projects. 2<br />

When another natural disaster hits or an extensive replacement<br />

or upgrade project is urgently needed, does the utility have enough<br />

detailed insight into its supply and demand to prioritise projects? Can<br />

it shift quickly from one project to another as circumstances change?<br />

And during this process, does it know the impact on operations and<br />

earnings from spending rands in one place versus another, spending<br />

rands in the wrong place or not at all?<br />

The bottom line here<br />

is that utilities now<br />

require supply chains<br />

that are responsive,<br />

reliable and agile.<br />

We see utilities’ related risks falling into three categories:<br />

Demand planning. Without a clear understanding of supply and<br />

demand across a utility’s business areas, it is challenging to manage<br />

increasing or varied lead times for supply materials and equipment.<br />

Longer term, more precise demand planning can help determine<br />

time horizons. There’s also the shift to consider from reactionary<br />

to precautionary planning that takes a longer-term view beyond<br />

solely the next rate case.<br />

Supplier reliability. An optimal and reliable selection of suppliers<br />

can help overcome shortages and ensure a resilient supply chain. The<br />

transformer production process, for example, is highly dependent<br />

on raw materials, including copper, electric steel and aluminium.<br />

Even as commodity prices fluctuate, having suppliers that can lock in<br />

timely acquisition is crucial. Still, the current environment indicates<br />

that equipment availability and resource scarcity are significant<br />

challenges, and utilities have not yet fully fleshed out the solutions.<br />

Agile governance. With a complete picture of the supply and demand<br />

fields, a utility can shift from one area to another, anticipating required<br />

lead times. For instance, if there is a major delay in transformer<br />

replacement, an agile utility has enough data and resources to be<br />

able to shift investments to another upgrade project.<br />

Longer forecast periods (beyond the next rate increase) help<br />

utilities and their suppliers plan more effectively. The bottom line<br />

here is that utilities now require supply chains that are responsive,<br />

reliable and agile.<br />

THINK IN TERMS OF REINVENTION<br />

We believe supply will become even more challenging. The supplier<br />

base has shrunk, and the suppliers that remain are in the driver’s<br />

seat, able to pick and choose which utility they will prioritise.<br />

Without intervening in some way, utilities will simply not be able<br />

to secure enough supplies, such as transformers, for years to come.<br />

What pressures utility supply chains now<br />

Various factors make it difficult for utilities’ supply chains to operate<br />

efficiently and at full value. First, there’s the material shortage. A<br />

scarcity of crucial items, such as electric steel, electronic components<br />

and cable are disrupting supply. Utilities have acutely felt the<br />

Figure 1. Worringly, shortages of critical equipment and materials do not<br />

show signs of abatement.<br />

1 US Energy Information Administration and Kearney analysis<br />

2 Kearney ExCap III survey of utility companies<br />

22 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!