28.12.2012 Views

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 <strong>Frontline</strong> <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong><br />

and Jamiat Ulema <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>, regrouped themselves in the form of the<br />

MMA. <strong>The</strong>ir shared perception of the post-9/11 world and their anti-<br />

US position impelled them to unite on one platform. One common<br />

objective was to resist Musharraf’s policy turnaround.<br />

Musharraf was bound by the Supreme Court ruling to hold<br />

parliamentary elections and transfer power to an elected government<br />

by October 2002. He, however, made his intentions very clear: there<br />

was going to be no complete transfer to an elected Parliament or to a<br />

civilian government. On the eve of the elections, he made sweeping<br />

changes in the constitution ensuring that he would continue to hold<br />

sway in the new order. <strong>The</strong> controversial redrafting of the constitution<br />

exposed Musharraf’s plan to establish a ‘controlled democracy’ in<br />

which the military would continue to cast its heavy shadow. It removed<br />

all illusions about the country’s return to democracy. 4<br />

<strong>The</strong> changes gave the President extensive powers, including the<br />

right to dismiss an elected Parliament. A military-dominated National<br />

Security Council, with overriding powers over Parliament, was<br />

to monitor the future civilian government. It was an entirely new<br />

constitution in which the source of power was outside the Parliament.<br />

Musharraf described the new order as the transition from ‘democratic<br />

dictatorship to an elected essence of democracy’.<br />

And it was not enough that the military government tried to micromanage<br />

the outcome of the elections and manipulate a ‘favourable result’.<br />

For several weeks before the nomination papers were filed, Tariq<br />

Aziz, the President’s powerful principal secretary, had camped out in<br />

Lahore, wheeling and dealing with politicians. <strong>The</strong> country’s most<br />

influential bureaucrat had an important task assigned to him by his<br />

military leader. His job was to knock together a pro-military alliance.<br />

Aided by Major-General Ehtesham Zamir, the head of the the ISI’s<br />

internal wing, Tariq Aziz manoeuvred a list of ‘loyal’ candidates. Most<br />

of them belonged to the <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> Muslim League (Quaid) faction, but<br />

there were several others who the military government believed were<br />

willing to cooperate. 5 <strong>The</strong>y included some of <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s most corrupt<br />

politicians, raising questions about Musharraf’s pledge to fight corruption.<br />

State machinery was blatantly used to get a ‘favourable result’.<br />

Tariq Aziz, a close pal of Musharraf’s from his student days, has<br />

been his key political strategist and had earlier engineered a split in the<br />

<strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> Muslim League. However, it was not just Tariq Aziz’s dexterity,<br />

but also heavy arm-twisting by the ISI, as well as the administration,<br />

which forced many to switch their loyalties. Never before had the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!