05.03.2024 Views

Lot's Wife Edition 1 2016

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOCIETY<br />

“Two potatoes tied<br />

together loosely<br />

by a piece of string<br />

could have been<br />

sworn in as Prime<br />

Minister”<br />

level, Turnbull is an infinitely more polished operator.<br />

The glamorous former journalist, lawyer, and<br />

businessman speaks with a supremely confident and<br />

measured tone, oozing intelligence and charisma.<br />

He doesn’t make stupid PR mistakes like winking<br />

after hearing about the plight of a grandmother<br />

forced to work for a phone sex hotline. He is able<br />

to articulate policy positions without the use of<br />

three word slogans, respecting the intelligence of<br />

the electorate. His public front is the antithesis of<br />

Abbott’s bumbling, awkward presentation.<br />

More importantly, he is a more consultative,<br />

less divisive leader. From the night of the spill, when<br />

the Prime Minister-designate fronted the media, his<br />

focus was markedly different. Rather than stirring up<br />

fear with divisive rhetoric about Australia’s perceived<br />

enemies, we heard that “...there has never been<br />

a more exciting time to be Australian.” Beyond his<br />

rhetoric, Turnbull has also proven to be a much more<br />

adept negotiator, open to compromise. This was<br />

demonstrated in the deal that Turnbull struck with<br />

the Greens to pass tax transparency legislation that<br />

had been bogged down by the Senate crossbench.<br />

But maybe it’s not just Turnbull’s charismatic<br />

and consultative front. Perhaps Turnbull has<br />

been able to steer his party towards more centrist<br />

positions. Perhaps the electorate is looking past<br />

personality politics and like what they see in<br />

Turnbull’s substantive policy views, which are clearly<br />

more progressive than Abbott’s. There are two<br />

factors to consider here.<br />

Firstly, Turnbull is the leader of a party with<br />

powerful conservative factions. Turnbull might hold<br />

progressive views on issues such as climate change,<br />

marriage equality, and the republic, but many of<br />

his party room and cabinet colleagues certainly do<br />

not. Since becoming Prime Minister, the dud Direct<br />

Action policy on climate change has been retained,<br />

the time-wasting plebiscite on marriage equality<br />

is scheduled to go ahead, and the stalled cuts to<br />

education and health in the Senate have not been<br />

dropped. Perhaps Turnbull’s moderate allies will<br />

be able to purge the radical right from his party,<br />

or maybe he will continue to be beholden to the<br />

conservatives. Liberal factional intrigue is murky and<br />

difficult to understand, and there is no guarantee<br />

that Turnbull will come out on top. It is important to<br />

note that, when you vote for the Liberals, you are not<br />

just electing Turnbull, but also a party that has been<br />

hijacked by the likes of Cory Bernardi and Eric Abetz.<br />

Secondly, Turnbull is still a committed believer<br />

in free market libertarianism and his economic views<br />

might not sit well with many progressive voters.<br />

When Turnbull announced his first Cabinet, Small<br />

Business Minister Bruce Bilson was sacked. Bilson<br />

was a strong advocate of an ‘effects test’ which<br />

would strengthen competition law so as to prevent<br />

anti-competitive behaviour from big business, a<br />

reform which has been lauded by the Council of<br />

Small Business Australia. The new Minister, Kelly<br />

O’Dwyer, and Turnbull himself, are reportedly<br />

opposed to the effects test, and it has been put on<br />

the backburner. Turnbull is still very much beholden<br />

to the big end of town.<br />

Turnbull reportedly once stated that he<br />

wanted to be Prime Minister before the age of forty.<br />

When asked which party he wanted to represent,<br />

he famously replied that it didn’t matter. Turnbull is<br />

a man who has worked tirelessly over his incredible<br />

career, making valuable contributions to the law,<br />

media, business, and public life. He has come from<br />

a broken family to amass a fortune that has made<br />

him one of the richest men in Australia. I admire<br />

him, and I can see why so many Australians feel the<br />

same way. But the electorate must ask themselves<br />

whether a man so driven by ambition and hubris<br />

can be trusted to deliver on what he has stood for,<br />

or whether he will be held hostage by the rest of his<br />

party so he can cling to his job.<br />

Malcolm Turnbull is a welcome change from<br />

Tony Abbott. His appointment ended the lunacy of<br />

the previous administration, and might challenge<br />

the parties of the left to a genuine contest of<br />

ideas rather than a ‘Shorten vs Abbott’ slogan<br />

writing competition. If Turnbull’s Liberals genuinely<br />

represent your beliefs and values, then by all<br />

means vote for them. But don’t let the Tories sneak<br />

in the back door because you like the look of the<br />

salesman. The party is bigger than the leader, and<br />

the leader is not all that he seems.<br />

Lot’s <strong>Wife</strong> | 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!