05.03.2024 Views

Lot's Wife Edition 1 2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCIENCE<br />

Orphan Black<br />

Human reproductive cloning has never been publicly<br />

completed. Yet in the world of Orphan Black, Sarah<br />

Manning (Tatiana Maslany) learns that she is one<br />

of many clones created in 1984. That’s right, forget<br />

Dolly the sheep of 1993, and forget Idaho Gem, the<br />

famed racing mule of 2003; Orphan Black creators<br />

Graeme Manson and John Fawcett suggest that the<br />

80s was where the race to human cloning began<br />

and ended.<br />

Over the course of last year’s third season<br />

(massive spoiler alert), Sarah Manning discovers<br />

that along with the female clones she’s met, her<br />

family extends to a heap of brother clones (Ari<br />

Millen). Things get even more extreme when the<br />

show reveals that these male and female clones<br />

aren’t just siblings, their DNA is derived from the<br />

exact same person!<br />

According to the explanation offered in the<br />

show, an individual may absorb their twin in the<br />

womb, and thereby carry two independent cell lines.<br />

This individual would have cell nuclei that could<br />

bring forth both male and female clones.<br />

As it happens, Orphan Black’s logic is more than just<br />

possible: it’s proven science.<br />

Vanishing twin syndrome (VTS) is a<br />

scientifically documented phenomenon, whereby a<br />

twin appears to disappear from the uterus. This is<br />

often due to one twin being absorbed into the other.<br />

If the two merging cell lines were from identical<br />

twins, there would be no noticeable difference<br />

between the DNA in cells. But when non-identical<br />

twins are merged, the individual would carry two<br />

distinct cell lines. They would become what is termed<br />

a tetragametic chimera. If non-identical twins of<br />

different sexes were merged, the resulting individual<br />

could indeed produce male and female clones,<br />

exactly as it is suggested in Orphan Black’s third<br />

season. ‘<br />

Rating:<br />

It’s All About Love<br />

The most annoying depictions of cloning and genetic<br />

modification in film occur as what some might call<br />

‘genetics lite’. This is when science is used merely<br />

as an aesthetic trick to distract the audience. In my<br />

mind, one of the worst offenders in this category is<br />

the 2003 romance drama, It’s All About Love.<br />

The film follows a champion ice skater (Claire<br />

Danes) as she slips into a long-winded conspiracy.<br />

Her family plans to murder her, and install an ice<br />

skating clone replica.<br />

Unlike in Orphan Black¸ the science of the<br />

cloning in It’s All About Love is incredibly thin. The<br />

audience is told that human clones can be created<br />

by playing around with the chemicals inside the<br />

human brain. This isn’t even close to being accurate.<br />

The reproductive cloning process involves<br />

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT), where a<br />

somatic cell (body cell) nucleus from a donor<br />

specimen is fused into a host egg cell (oocyte). The<br />

oocyte will reprogram the donated nucleus into a<br />

primitive, undifferentiated form, and henceforth the<br />

clone begins prenatal development like a regular<br />

embryo. There is no cheap shortcut for cloning.<br />

It’s All About Love gets even more silly. In an<br />

absurd scene, a television reporter announces that<br />

alongside human heart issues and inversed weather<br />

patterns around the globe, the laws of gravity have<br />

been messing up above Eastern Africa, causing<br />

hundreds of people to fly off into space. I don’t need<br />

to go into why all that makes no sense.<br />

To sit through all of It’s All About Love is<br />

not something I would recommend. The scientific<br />

references in the film were all tokenistic – perhaps<br />

they were thrown in last. If you think that your soft<br />

spot for Claire Danes or Joaquin Phoenix will improve<br />

the film, let me tell you, it sadly does not. I only wish<br />

that I could go back to spend that hour and a half of<br />

my life differently, perhaps by reading ‘Theoretical<br />

Astrophysics for Dummies’ or watching Jurassic Park.<br />

Rating:<br />

36 | Lot’s <strong>Wife</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!