Gastroenterology Today Spring 2024

FEATURE
FEATURE
FEATURE
21. Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JM, Whynes DK. Prevention
16. Sivero, L. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of
of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet.
neuroendocrine
1993;341(8847):736–40.
tumors of the digestive system. Open Med. 11(1),
22.
369–373.
Percy C,
https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0067
Holten VV, Muir CS. International classification
(2016).
of
17. Witteman, diseases for B. J., oncology. Janssens, Percy A. C, R., Holten Griffi oen, V, Muir G. & C, Lamers, editors, C. 2nd. B.
Villous Geneva: tumours World of Health the duodenum. Organization; An 1990. analysis of the literature with
23. emphasis Thomas-Gibson on malignant S, Rogers transformation. P, Cooper S, Neth. Man J. R, Med. Rutter 42, MD, 5 (1993).
Suzuki N, et al. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at
18. Levine, J. A., Burgart, L. J., Batts, K. P. & Wang, K. K. Brunner’s
screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in
gland hamartomas: Clinical presentation and pathological features
adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2006;38(5):456–60.
of 27 cases. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 90, 290–294 (1995).
24. Song M, Emilsson L, Roelstraete B, Ludvigsson JF. Risk
19. Noguchi, of colorectal H. et cancer al. Prevalence in first degree of Helicobacter relatives of pylori patients infection with rate
in colorectal heterotopic polyps: gastric nationwide mucosa in case-control histological study analysis in Sweden. of duodenal BMJ.
specimens 2021;373:n877. from patients with duodenal ulcer. Histol. Histopathol.
25. 35(2), Fracchia 169–176. M, Senore https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-142 C, Armaroli P, Ferraris R, Placido RD, (2020) Musso
(Epub A, et 2019 al. Assessment Jul 2). of the multiple components of the variability
in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and
20. Singhal, S. et al. Anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case
lessons for training. Endoscopy. 2010;42(6):448–55.
report and literature review. Case Rep. Gastrointest. Med. 2013,
26. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J-J, Burnand B, Vader
934875 (2013).
J-P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic
21. Modlin, yield of I. colonoscopy- M., Lye, K. D. the & Kidd, European M. A panel 5-decade of appropriateness
analysis of 13,715
carcinoid of gastrointestinal tumors. Cancer endoscopy 97, 934–959 European (2003). multicenter study.
22. Bulur, Gastrointest A. et al. Endosc. Polypoid 2005;61(3):378–84.
lesions detected in the upper
27.
gastrointestinal
Fritz CDL, Smith
endoscopy:
ZL, Elsner
A
J,
retrospective
Hollander T, Early
analysis
D, Kushnir
in 19560
V.
Prolonged cecal insertion time is not associated with decreased
patients, a single-center study of a 5-year experience in Turkey.
adenoma detection when a longer withdrawal time is achieved.
N. Clin. Istanb. 8(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.14744/
Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(11):3120–5.
nci.2020.16779 (2020).
28. von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H. Prolonged cecal
23. Kostiainen, insertion time S., Teppo, is associated L. & Virkkula, with decreased L. Papilloma adenoma of the detection.
oesophagus. Gastrointest Report Endosc. of 2017;85(3):574–80.
a case. Scand. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc.
29. Surg. Yang 7(1), MH, 95–97. Cho J, https://doi.org/10.3109/14017437309139176
Rampal S, Choi EK, Choi Y-H, Lee JH, et al. The
(1973). association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm
24. Mandard,
detection.
A.
BMC
M. et
Gastroenterol.
al. Cancer of
2013;13(1):124.
the esophagus and associated
30. Wong MCS, Ching JYL, Chan VCW, Lam TYT, Luk AKC, Tang
lesions: Detailed pathologic study of 100 esophagectomy
RSY, et al. Determinants of bowel preparation quality and its
specimens. Hum. Pathol. 15, 660 (1984).
association with adenoma detection: a prospective colonoscopy
25. Levine, study. J. Medicine A., Burgart, (Baltimore). L. J., Batts, 2016;95(2):e2251.
K. P. & Wang, K. K. Brunner’s
31. gland Kim WH, hamartomas: Cho YJ, Park Clinical JY, presentation Min PK, Kang and JK, pathological Park IS. Factors features
of affecting 27 cases. insertion Am. J. time Gastroenterol. and patient 90(2), discomfort 290–294 during (1995). colonoscopy.
26. Ma, Gastrointest M. X. & Bourke, Endosc. M. 2000;52(5):600–5.
J. Management of duodenal polyps. Best
Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 31(4), 389–399 (2017).
32. Adebogun AO, Berg CD, Laiyemo AO. Concerns and challenges
Author contributions
in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Colorectal Cancer.
Ç.E., 2012;1(4):309–19.
M.Y.: conception, design, supervision, materials, data collection
33. and processing, Doria-Rose analysis VP, Newcomb and interpretation, PA, Levin TR. literature Incomplete review, screening writer
and critical flexible review. sigmoidoscopy D.A., B.Y., associated K.K. O.C., with İ.T., H.T.K.: female sex, materials, age, and data
increased risk of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2005;54(9):1273–8.
collection and processing, analysis and interpretation, literature review
34. Laiyemo AO, Doubeni C, Pinsky PF, Doria-Rose VP, Sanderson
and manuscript AK 2nd, Bresalier supervision. R, et al. Factors associated with inadequate
colorectal cancer screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Cancer
Competing Epidemiol. interests 2012;36(4):395–9.
35. Cross AJ, Robbins EC, Saunders BP, Duffy SW, Wooldrage K.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Higher adenoma detection rates at screening associated with
lower long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin
Additional Gastroenterol information Hepatol. 2022;20(2):e148–67.
36. Correspondence Brenner H, Chang-Claude and requests for J, materials Seiler CM, should Hoffmeister be addressed M. Interval to Ç.E.
cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based casecontrol
study. Gut. 2012;61(11):1576–82.
37. Reprints Kaminski and permissions MF, Thomas-Gibson information S, Bugajski is available M, Bretthauer at M,
www.nature.com/reprints.
Rees CJ, Dekker E, et al. Performance measures for lower
gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
2017;49(4):378–97.
38. jurisdictional Power S, claims Wooldrage in published K, Cross maps A. and P190 institutional The impact affi of liations. endoscopist
performance on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer
Open incidence. Access This Gut. article 2022;71(Suppl is licensed under 1):A133. a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
Publisher’s Note
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as
long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
Springer provide a Nature link to the remains Creative neutral Commons with regard licence, to and jurisdictional indicate if claims changes in
published were made. maps The images and institutional or other third affiliations. party material in this article are
included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted
by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to
obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.
© The Author(s) 2023
C
M
Y
CM
MY
CY
CMY
K
Network with peers from across the country and share best practice
Contributes towards CPD hours
Free educational resources
Training designed and delivered by IBD nurses for IBD nurses
WHY NOT WRITE FOR US?
GASTROENTEROLOGY TODAY – SPRING 2024
Gastroenterology Today welcomes the submission of
clinical papers and case reports or news that
you feel will be of interest to your colleagues.
Material submitted will be seen by those working within all
UK gastroenterology departments and endoscopy units.
All submissions should be forwarded to info@mediapublishingcompany.com
If you have any queries please contact the publisher Terry Gardner via:
info@mediapublishingcompany.com
GASTROENTEROLOGY TODAY - SUMMER 2023
IBD Nurse
Education Modules
Join us on a fully funded,
innovative and practical
training course.
IBD STARS Event
An annual event
recognising excellence
in improving IBD
patient care.
Kickstart your LOGIC Education journey…
logic-tillotts.co.uk
Tillotts LOGIC Education is organised and fully funded by Tillotts Pharma UK,
as a part of our commitment to reinvest in the NHS and improve patient care.
eLearning Portal
Bite-sized, interactive
educational modules for
healthcare professionals
in IBD.
GASTROENTEROLOGY TODAY – SPRING 2024
18 11
PU-01608 | January 2024 Intended for UK healthcare professionals only. Some of this education may contain reference to Tillotts products. 19