17.04.2024 Views

Newslink April marketing special

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain - driving instructors - marketing and new members special. Road safety, driver training and testing

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain - driving instructors - marketing and new members special. Road safety, driver training and testing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

News<br />

Big fall in pass rates when no duals involved<br />

During Conference a delegate put the<br />

following question to the DVSA: ‘Do<br />

candidates fare better or worse on their<br />

L-test if they take it in their own car, without<br />

dual controls being present?’<br />

The suggestion back was to “put an FOI in,<br />

and find out.”<br />

So <strong>Newslink</strong> did... read on for the answer!<br />

In recent months there has been a lot of<br />

debate around candidates taking their L-test<br />

in their own cars, and as a consequence,<br />

taking it without dual controls being present.<br />

In particular ADIs have wondered whether<br />

taking a test in a non-ADI car impacts on the<br />

pass rate. Are examiners less inclined to pass<br />

a candidate without duals being present, or is<br />

the act of taking a test without your<br />

instructor being involved likely to lend itself<br />

to a greater chance of a fail – or a pass?<br />

This has become an increasingly important<br />

question as more and more learners,<br />

desperate to obtain an L-test slot, have<br />

booked tests without first checking with<br />

their ADI that they are available on the day<br />

and at the time in question – or whether they<br />

are ready to take their test.<br />

In addition, some ADIs have refused to<br />

accompany their pupils on tests when they<br />

think they are clearly not ready, particularly if<br />

they feel a bad fail could impact on their TIP<br />

score.<br />

So, do candidates fare better in their own<br />

cars, without duals, or does it make no<br />

difference to overall pass rates?<br />

We asked the DVSA, and the answer is,<br />

yes, it does make a difference – and a quite<br />

sizeable one at that.<br />

We asked the DVSA ‘How many candidates<br />

took their driving test (L-test) in a car which<br />

did not have dual controls fitted, from<br />

September 2023-February 2024.’<br />

The answer may surprise you, as it is a lot;<br />

in fact during that period 165,403 people<br />

took tests in cars without dual controls.<br />

We estimate that that period saw around<br />

900,000 L-tests being conducted, so ‘own<br />

car tests’ amounted to just under 20 per cent<br />

of the vehicles used. That is a far higher<br />

proportion than previously; in many years<br />

‘own car’ tests made up far fewer than 10 per<br />

cent of the whole.<br />

And now the $64m question: how did they<br />

do? The answer is... pretty badly!<br />

At present the pass rate for the L-test as a<br />

whole is reasonably high, at around 48.6%.<br />

But for those taking a test in a vehicle<br />

without dual controls, the pass rate is 42.6%<br />

– that’s a drop of just over 12 per cent.<br />

Impact on L-test waiting times<br />

To put that in context, if candidates could<br />

take their test only in an ADI’s car with duals<br />

fitted, and the pass rates stayed the same,<br />

based on 1.8 million tests a year, 10,000 more<br />

people would pass the L-test every six<br />

months. That would reduce the number of<br />

candidates on the L-test waiting list by a<br />

minimum of 20,000 a year.<br />

Why a minimum? Because we are<br />

assuming that every failure only takes one<br />

more test; but as we all know, some<br />

candidates will take multiple goes before<br />

leaving the L-test scene with a pass.<br />

So there we have it: if the DVSA stopped all<br />

tests without dual controls, logic tells us we<br />

would immediately reduce the waiting list by<br />

at least 20,000 in a year. Over to you, DVSA.<br />

For more on the DVSA at the MSA GB<br />

Conference, see page 14<br />

Peggy Hutchins: A titan of the Taunton ADI scene<br />

Colin Lilly<br />

Editor,<br />

<strong>Newslink</strong><br />

As this issue of <strong>Newslink</strong> was being prepared<br />

for publication, I heard the sad news of the<br />

passing of a former MSA GB Member of the<br />

Year, Peggy Hutchins.<br />

Peggy was a formidable character who<br />

was Chairman of the local Taunton<br />

Association of Driving Instructors. She was<br />

respected by her fellow instructors, the then<br />

Driving Standards Agency and local authority<br />

road safety officers.<br />

She set up many young driver courses in<br />

local schools supporting local trainers. One of<br />

her proteges was Arthur Mynott, himself a<br />

past MSA GB Member of the Year and<br />

currently West Coast and Wales Chairman.<br />

She always promoted the MSA GB to every<br />

instructor she met, and highlighted the value<br />

of being a member. It was in recognition of<br />

her work for the association and driver<br />

training in Somerset that she was named as<br />

our Member of the Year in 2000.<br />

In recent years she had been affected by<br />

the conditions of old age and had been living<br />

quietly in a nursing home where she passed<br />

away on 30th March.<br />

I am sure that many established driver<br />

trainers in the Taunton area, her countless<br />

former pupils and past and present members<br />

of the MSA GB regional committee, of which<br />

she was once the Deputy Chairman, will have<br />

many fond memories of Peggy.<br />

A celebration of her life will be held at<br />

Taunton Deane Crematorium on Friday, 19th<br />

<strong>April</strong> at 11.20am.<br />

A true stalwart of the profession and of<br />

this association: thank you, Peggy.<br />

Rest in peace<br />

14 NEWSLINK n APRIL 2024

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!