29.12.2012 Views

Communal Aerial Upgrade Consultation - Norwich City Council

Communal Aerial Upgrade Consultation - Norwich City Council

Communal Aerial Upgrade Consultation - Norwich City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report for Resolution<br />

Report to Executive<br />

19 July 2006<br />

Item<br />

Report of Strategic Director - Neighbourhoods and Community<br />

Subject <strong>Communal</strong> TV <strong>Aerial</strong> <strong>Upgrade</strong> <strong>Consultation</strong><br />

Purpose<br />

15<br />

To inform Executive of the options available for the delivery of digital television<br />

signals to 9,900 properties (tenants and leaseholders) that currently receive<br />

analogue television transmissions when the analogue signal is switched off in 2011<br />

and to approve a preferred option prior to consulting tenants and leaseholders on<br />

the options available.<br />

Recommendations<br />

1. Members are asked to approve the options to be put forward for<br />

consultation with tenants and leaseholders with a recommendation that the<br />

existing analogue communal TV aerial systems are replaced, on a<br />

programmed basis, with a new digital IRS reception system that is leased<br />

on a 20 year full maintenance and upgrade lease; and<br />

2. To delegate authority to the Strategic Director Neighbourhoods and<br />

Community in consultation with the portfolio holder to replace the existing<br />

analogue system taking account of tenants and leaseholders preferences.<br />

Financial Consequences<br />

Depending on the option chosen there will be charge implications for tenants and<br />

leaseholders. In addition to this to produce the necessary specialist contract<br />

documentation and manage the project will result in a cost to the <strong>Council</strong>, which<br />

will be met from the Housing Revenue Account.<br />

Corporate Objective/Service Plan Priority<br />

The report helps to achieve the corporate objective to strive for sufficient, goodquality,<br />

affordable housing, providing choice and accessibility and the service plan<br />

priority to ensure a strategy is agreed in order to ensure a digital TV reception is<br />

provided for 9,900 homes when the analogue signal is switched off in 2011<br />

Contact Officers<br />

Chris Rayner, Housing Property Manager<br />

Paul Sutton, Business Planning Manager<br />

01603 213208<br />

01603 212785


Background Documents<br />

None


Report<br />

Context<br />

1. The <strong>Council</strong> is responsible for providing a communal TV aerial system to 9,900<br />

properties, or 53% of the housing stock, (mainly flats but also a number of<br />

houses) including both tenants and leaseholders. These systems were<br />

designed to carry five television channels (BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Channel 4 and<br />

Channel 5) transmitted in the traditional, analogue format. The distribution<br />

systems are not capable of transmitting digital channels from the terrestrial<br />

(Freeview) and the satellite (Sky and others) broadcasters. This means that<br />

from 2011 when the analogue television signals are switched off in the Anglia<br />

region, in favour of digital transmission, the existing communal television aerials<br />

will cease to deliver a television signal.<br />

2. Due to the popularity of digital television in the UK, over 63% of UK homes now<br />

have digital television of one form or another, this has caused the gradual<br />

proliferation of aerials and satellite dishes attached to houses and flat blocks<br />

within <strong>Norwich</strong> <strong>City</strong>. Permission from <strong>Norwich</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and the Planning<br />

Directorate should be obtained before any aerial or dish is erected, but many<br />

installations are carried out without these permissions.<br />

3. Because most new televisions have integral digital capability and Freeview settop<br />

boxes can be bought for as little as £30, there are an increasing number of<br />

residents and leaseholders requesting the capability of receiving digital<br />

broadcasts, and the level of complaints received by the <strong>Council</strong> is increasing.<br />

4. The implication of digital switchover is that all landlords must decide on a<br />

planned response to the switch-off of analogue broadcasting in the UK. There<br />

is no suggestion from Government that the landlord costs will be met from any<br />

additional funding – although the DCMS have made reference to financial and<br />

practical help for the elderly (over 75) and other vulnerable groups in society –<br />

funded from the BBC license fee. An announcement will be made in due course<br />

on how this support will operate but it is unlikely that social landlords will<br />

qualify.<br />

5. Some 20% of homes in the UK receive television signals though communal<br />

aerials – so it affects flatted housing stock across the whole of the UK. The<br />

DCMS say that 95% of Local Authorities and 74% of RSLs own or manage<br />

properties with communal TV systems. In a survey carried out by the DCMS, in<br />

February 2005, it was found that 37% of LAs and 50% of RSLs have made no<br />

start to the improvement of their aerial systems. This all means that as the<br />

switchover timetable approaches it will become increasingly difficult for<br />

landlords to find aerial contractors with a good track record of installing digital<br />

television distribution systems. There will be an industry skills shortage. Given<br />

this and customer demand there is therefore the need to plan now for the<br />

distribution of digital television signals in our housing stockwell ahead of the<br />

“switch-off”.<br />

6. Appendix A gives the background to the digital television and the platforms<br />

currently available.


System Options<br />

7. Following discussions with several specialist companies including Sky Homes<br />

and Stanley Blick there are two system options available to the <strong>Council</strong>; these<br />

being an Integrated Reception System (IRS) and an upgrading of the existing<br />

system (called a ‘head end’ upgrade). Both systems will deliver a digital signal<br />

but only the IRS system includes all ‘free to air’ channels (replacing the need<br />

for a set top box or integrated television) but tenants and leaseholders will need<br />

to purchase their own satellite receiver in order to receive subscription channels<br />

through the IRS system. This would allow all current resident owned aerials and<br />

satellite dishes to be removed. The ‘head end’ upgrade will only deliver the 5<br />

terrestrial channels and only allow the removal of resident’s own aerials.<br />

8. One other option would be to decommission all equipment and no longer offer<br />

this service. The <strong>Council</strong> has no statutory duty to provide this service. However<br />

this a problematic option because planning restrictions limit each block to one<br />

dish. It is also doubtful if this would be acceptable to residents and for the<br />

purposes of this report this option has not been progressed.<br />

Integrated Reception System (IRS)<br />

9. With an Integrated Reception System, a satellite dish, UHF aerial and radio<br />

antenna are connected by new cables to homes which collects the broadcast<br />

signals from both terrestrial and satellite transmitters, as well as FM and DAB<br />

radio. All available signals are then distributed to a new four-way wall outlet<br />

plate in each flat.<br />

Advantages -<br />

� Provides greater choice for residents because they can choose to only<br />

receive free to view channels or subscribe to any subscription package and<br />

also Sky+ (if this wiring option is adopted).<br />

� Negates the need for individual satellite dishes or aerials, which can be<br />

removed.<br />

� Provides new wiring systems, which we have been advised, are “future<br />

proof”.<br />

� Access to non-English language channels possible thereby giving residents<br />

additional choice and addressing equality and diversity issues.<br />

� As part of the future proofing it is possible to have video door entry systems<br />

linked to the system to allow residents to view who they allow to access the<br />

building, although clearly this would need investment in the necessary video<br />

equipment in communal areas as well as each property, which is currently<br />

not in place.<br />

Disadvantages-<br />

� High installation costs if system purchased not leased ( £175 - £225 per<br />

home)<br />

� More difficult installation and access required to each home.<br />

� More difficult to procure specialist contractors.


� More supervision of works required due to the specialist nature.<br />

Upgrading of Existing System<br />

10. The simplest and cheapest way to upgrade the communal systems to receive<br />

digital broadcasts is to change the aerials and electronics to receive digital<br />

signals, called a “head end” upgrade. NTL have offered to upgrade all of the<br />

existing systems to receive digital broadcasts on a routine basis or as they<br />

need repair within the existing contract. This will mean that some residents may<br />

not be able to receive digital broadcasts until 2010, which is close to the<br />

switchover deadline and would mean an increasing number of enquiries and<br />

complaints, which may be unacceptable. This upgrade involves leaving the old<br />

coaxial cables and old outlet plates in position, which will need<br />

upgrading/replacing at some stage in the future.<br />

Advantages –<br />

� lower costs (about £50 per home) although a contingency budget would be<br />

required for any new wiring found necessary, which is highly likely.<br />

� no access required to individual properties.<br />

� easier and quicker installation process.<br />

Disadvantages –<br />

� Electrical interference on digital channels and re-setting of set top boxes.<br />

� No non-English channels available - fails to recognise diversity.<br />

� Limits choice to “Freeview” only – no access to satellite services.<br />

� Continued proliferation of satellite dishes – disputes & damage.<br />

� Regarded as a temporary solution – rewiring necessary at some point in the<br />

near future.<br />

� Not “future proof”.<br />

Funding Options<br />

Current Costs<br />

11. The current analogue system, owned and maintained by NTL, costs £164,000<br />

per year (Approximately £17 per property per year) this covers hire of<br />

equipment and maintenance. £17,000 of the cost is recovered from<br />

leaseholders connected to the scheme. 436 freeholders are connected to the<br />

system having made a one off payment of £15.00 to be connected for the<br />

duration of the current NTL contract. The remaining £147,000 is pooled across<br />

the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) which means it is funded from the rents<br />

of all tenants regardless of whether they are connected to a communal aerial.


12. In line with the Government policy of rent restructuring it is proposed that any<br />

new contract and costs result in a specific service charge to dwellings which<br />

are connected to a communal system and that the cost is no longer pooled<br />

across all tenants. This charge would be eligible for housing benefit.<br />

Options 1 Integrated Reception System (IRS) Capital Budget Option (outright<br />

purchase)<br />

13. Based on an estimated price of £194 per home outright purchase cost of an<br />

IRS system would be £1,922,500 (note this cost includes contractors<br />

overheads, project management costs etc). An annual maintenance agreement<br />

would cost approx £118,000. The same system but including Sky+ would be<br />

£2,170,000 (again this cost includes contractors overheads, project<br />

management costs etc), with the annual maintenance agreement costing<br />

£138,600. The works could be phased over more than two years, giving an<br />

annual budget of approximately £1 million per annum depending on which<br />

option is adopted. This would have to be found from the existing Housing<br />

Investment Capital budget, at the expense of an existing programme, as no<br />

further funds are available.<br />

14. Tenants would not be liable for installation costs but would face a specific<br />

weekly service charge for maintenance of between £0.23 and £0.27 depending<br />

on the option chosen. Leaseholders and freeholders would be liable for the one<br />

off installation cost and an annual maintenance fee.<br />

Option 2 Head End <strong>Upgrade</strong><br />

15. Head End upgrades are cheaper and at £50 per home would cost £495,000, or<br />

close to £250,000 per year over two years. This is a more affordable option. A<br />

contingency budget of £50,000 a year would also be required for any additional<br />

wiring upgrades.<br />

16. The option offered by NTL to upgrade the head end on a rolling programme<br />

would cost nothing, but would take up to 5 years to complete as upgrades will<br />

only take place as systems fail. There would be an undoubted increase in<br />

charges for tenants and leaseholders with ntl currently pressing for an annual<br />

increase of almost 30% on current charges.


17. Table 1 - Outright purchase potential charges<br />

Option Total cost Cost per<br />

dwelling<br />

Maintenance<br />

Annual<br />

Cost per<br />

home<br />

Sky £1,922,500 £194 £12 £0.23<br />

Sky + £2,170,000 £220 £14 £0.27<br />

Head end<br />

upgrade<br />

ntl upgrade Estimated<br />

£211,560<br />

£ 495,000 £50 0 0<br />

Option 3 Leasing an Integrated Reception System.<br />

£21.00 £0.41<br />

Maintenance<br />

Weekly cost<br />

per home<br />

18. The alternative to using capital to procure the works is through a lease<br />

agreement where the cost of the upgrade work is paid for by the service<br />

provider who then leases the service back to the <strong>Council</strong>. With most major<br />

installers strategic partnerships can be entered into over a period of 10 years or<br />

longer. In this way the capital cost is met by the service provider and the IRS<br />

service is leased.<br />

19. The costs and charges of leasing are illustrated below. This charge would be<br />

recovered from leaseholders in their service charge and set up as a weekly<br />

service charge for tenants. As previously noted this weekly service charge<br />

would be covered by housing benefit, which will mean that in adopting this<br />

option we will not be increasing the financial burden on those tenants on<br />

benefit. Companies are reluctant to offer a lease option for a head end<br />

upgrade that also includes maintenance of the existing wiring and fittings.<br />

20. Table 2-Leasing option potential charges<br />

Option Total cost Annual<br />

Cost per<br />

home<br />

Weekly<br />

Cost per<br />

home<br />

Sky 10 years £460,000 £47.00 £0.90<br />

Sky 20 years £305,000 £31.00 £0.60<br />

Sky + 10 years £520,800 £53.00 £1.00<br />

Sky +20 years £347,200 £35.00 £0.68<br />

21. Another financial consideration is whatever system is adopted, unless an<br />

extension of the existing contract is negotiated, the <strong>Council</strong> will have to buy the<br />

existing system back from NTL. A price has not been given, but is unlikely to<br />

exceed £20,000.


Contract Procurement<br />

22. Due to the nature of this work specialist skills and knowledge are required for<br />

the procurement process and it will be necessary to appoint a consultant to<br />

prepare the tender documentation. The availability of such specialists is limited<br />

(particularly in view of the short timescale to the switchover date and the<br />

volume of work to be carried out nationally) and consideration is being given,<br />

and legal advice is being sought, to determine the most efficient approach to<br />

appointing such a specialist.<br />

23. Project management of the programme is another specialist area however the<br />

costs for this work are included in the funding options and are approximately<br />

£100,000 over the term of the contract.<br />

Timescales<br />

24. The intention is to use the remainder of this financial year to procure the<br />

contract in order that we have a contractor ready to start on site after April<br />

2007. The detailed programme of work would need to be agreed with the<br />

successful contractor but in terms of the overall high level programme<br />

anticipated timescales for each option are:<br />

� Full IRS system either outright capital purchase or leased option is two to<br />

three years.<br />

� Head end upgrade of existing system is two years.<br />

� NTL head end upgrade would be carried out over the next five years but<br />

exact timescales would be entirely dependant on the reliability of each<br />

system over that period (as upgrading would only take place if systems<br />

failed or required considerable maintenance) and would not allow us to<br />

notify residents of the intended programme of upgrade work in advance.<br />

Other Considerations<br />

25. As mentioned previously there are a limited number of approved contractors<br />

able to carry out this specialist work and with the switchover date rapidly<br />

approaching their services will be in demand and prices will rise, so we need to<br />

ensure we use the remainder of this year to procure the work in order to make<br />

a start on site next year.<br />

<strong>Consultation</strong><br />

26. It is proposed that all tenants and leaseholders, in affected dwellings, be<br />

informed that the current analogue communal TV aerial systems system needs<br />

to be replaced and the <strong>Council</strong>s preferred option is a new digital IRS reception<br />

system as this will give tenants and leaseholders access to more channels and<br />

reduce future costs. It is intended to recommend that it is leased on a 20 year<br />

full maintenance and upgrade lease. The consultation document will explain<br />

fully why the change is necessary and what the potential costs are. The<br />

consultation will invite comments from tenants and leaseholders and an


indication on which option they would prefer. The Authority will need to<br />

demonstrate to all tenants and leaseholders that the proposed solution is value<br />

for money and that any cost will be reasonably incurred. Because the cost to<br />

individual leaseholders will be less that £100 per year a full section 20<br />

consultation will not be required.<br />

Conclusion<br />

27. Whilst the upgrade of the existing system by NTL is the cheapest option it is not<br />

considered best value for money as further upgrade work of cabling etc will be<br />

required in the near future and this system will not be ‘future proof’ in terms of<br />

technological improvements and changes. By far the best value for money<br />

solution in the long term will be the IRS system, and this is the system that the<br />

vast majority of other social landlords are adopting, but the ‘up-front’ capital<br />

cost of such a system effectively makes it unaffordable for the <strong>Council</strong> given the<br />

need to spend capital resources on meeting Decent Homes targets and other<br />

tenant aspirations. However, the same system can be leased with a full<br />

maintenance system at a cost comparable to the existing analogue system with<br />

the added benefit of providing residents with a choice of digital services,<br />

helping address the e-government agenda and equality and diversity issues<br />

that may exist. A further consideration is the level of choice provided to<br />

residents and whether, for the marginal additional cost (£5 per property per<br />

year or 9 pence per property per week), we provide a system that allows the<br />

resident to choose Sky+. An additional benefit is that future budget setting and<br />

provision is known and so gives added certainty to future costs.


APPENDIX A<br />

Background to digital television<br />

1. Digital television was launched on 1 October 1998 and has enabled<br />

broadcasters to vastly increase the choice of programmes available to viewers<br />

from the Terrestrial (through an aerial), Satellite (through a dish), Cable (though<br />

underground cables) or Broadband (through DSL telephone lines) suppliers.<br />

For the Terrestrial and Satellite suppliers this expanding choice includes new,<br />

free-to-view and subscription services – far beyond the familiar BBC, ITV,<br />

Channel 4 / S4C and Five terrestrial services. Services from Cable and<br />

Broadband all require subscription payments. Interactive services within digital<br />

broadcasting are also growing; playing an increasingly important role in the egovernment<br />

agenda.<br />

2. The Secretary of State confirmed in September 2005 the switchover to digital<br />

broadcasts will be between 2008 and 2012 ensuring universal access to highquality,<br />

free-to-view and subscription digital TV. For the Anglia region, the<br />

switchover will take place in 2011. In order to receive digital television services<br />

from one of the suppliers viewers must be equipped with a digital receiver,<br />

commonly known as a “set top” box. These are available from the High Street<br />

retailers. Alternatively, you can purchase a digital-ready television from the<br />

High Street, these are known as Integrated Digital Television sets (iDTV) and<br />

have the digital receiver integrated into the television itself. In all cases, ofcourse,<br />

the digital receiver must be able to receive the required digital signals.<br />

In blocks of flats this means either having your own aerial or dish or being able<br />

to plug the box into a communal aerial that delivers all of the required digital<br />

signals.<br />

Available Television Platforms<br />

3. There are three different types (or “platforms”) of digital television available in<br />

<strong>Norwich</strong> to choose from: satellite (Sky), terrestrial (freeview) or cable. With<br />

terrestrial residents can buy a set top box (currently £35 to £150 depending on<br />

quality), which connects between the television set and the aerial source.<br />

Connection is usually undertaken by the householder themselves. The<br />

Freeview box delivers 30 television channels and a growing number of digital<br />

radio stations. There is no monthly subscription for Freeview – although there is<br />

“Top-Up TV” which tops up the service with eleven subscription channels.<br />

With satellite residents can access free-to-view channels and a range of<br />

subscription channels. The “Freesat” service from Sky offers 120 digital TV<br />

channels and 80 digital radio channels. Alternatively, residents can subscribe to<br />

Sky and build their own digital television package, from six channel mixes, up to<br />

500+ channels. Residents can opt for the Sky+ service, which includes a<br />

personal video recorder recording directly to the Sky+ box at the touch of a<br />

button ,no tapes and no timers as well as pausing live tv action and returning<br />

later and instantly rewinding.<br />

Another satellite free-to-view service is being planned for launch early in 2006.<br />

The BBC and ITV are currently exploring a new satellite service, which will<br />

provide free-to-view services delivered from the Astra satellite.


Cable (NTL / TeleWest) provides up to 160 channels on subscription packages. It<br />

does not currently offer free channels but plans are being made to do so. Cable<br />

access is not currently provided to all <strong>Council</strong> housing in <strong>Norwich</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!