final evaluation report akk_iges_final.pdf - IGES EnviroScope
final evaluation report akk_iges_final.pdf - IGES EnviroScope
final evaluation report akk_iges_final.pdf - IGES EnviroScope
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APFED Project Final Evaluation Report 2011<br />
6. Efficiency of project operational strategies<br />
Multiple strategies were applied by the project which include village based risk and resource<br />
mapping; village based organization development; community awareness creation; positive<br />
discrimination policy application to women’s participation; establishment of community based early<br />
warning systems and linking it with the DMIC; receiving flood early warning 72 hours in advance;<br />
linkage building with upazilla government departments for better access to government services;<br />
coordination with UP; establishment of village based EW board; hydroponics cultivation; raising<br />
homesteads; linking indigenous and scientific knowledge, and promoting personal hygiene, access to<br />
safe drinking water etc. The project also has engaged multiple stakeholders which include especially<br />
the government machinery that is often neglected by the NGO-led activities in most of the developing<br />
countries. This has brought great visibility to the project activities in the district.<br />
7. Effectiveness<br />
The project has created the following positive effects:<br />
Augmentation of knowledge and awareness among the community about climate risk<br />
reduction:<br />
From the field visits and interviews, it was observed that the project has contributed to the knowledge<br />
and awareness among the community members on various issues related to the climate change and<br />
related driving forces and needed adaptation mechanisms.<br />
Improvement in mitigation measures and Emergency Response:<br />
The project has contributed to the improved emergency response and disaster mitigation efforts. The<br />
Figure 19 indicates responses from the community members on the impact of the project in terms of<br />
the risk reduction. The community members were of the opinion that raising the cattle shed has<br />
contributed to a sense of security to them since the loss of cattle and other assets were one of the<br />
major concerns for them during the floods. Following the cattle shed raising, the preparedness<br />
activities have contributed to the next biggest sense of security to them since they opined that the<br />
preparedness would help them to avoid any kind of ‘surprises’.<br />
35