06.01.2013 Views

Supply Chain Management with APO

Supply Chain Management with APO

Supply Chain Management with APO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

326 16 Sales in a Make-to-Order Environment<br />

• ATP <strong>with</strong> Allocations<br />

The ATP check against allocations in general is explained in section 7.5.<br />

In this case the idea is to use the allocation quantities as aggregated capacities.<br />

This is of course only possible if the production structure allows to<br />

define a capacity per product group. It is possible to consider the lead time<br />

by combining the allocation check <strong>with</strong> a product check and using the<br />

check horizon for the product check.<br />

• Combined Sales and Production Planning<br />

The other two solutions – CTP and ML-ATP – both trigger the creation of<br />

a planned order by the ATP check. This means that sales is performing<br />

production planning tasks (in the background). The combination of sales<br />

and production planning in the ATP check does have impacts on the production<br />

side, mainly for the functions for production planning in SAP<br />

<strong>APO</strong>. These are described in the limitations for CTP resp. ML-ATP.<br />

From a business process side the no major changes regarding the responsibilities<br />

and the exception handling are expected. The biggest hurdle<br />

is to get the planners’ acceptance to pass the control about the planned order<br />

creation to sales.<br />

• CTP for Make-to-Stock<br />

When CTP or ML-ATP is used, this should be the only source for production<br />

planning. It is however possible to apply CTP in a make-to-stock scenario<br />

if a part of the demand is planned for <strong>with</strong> independent requirements.<br />

This increases the complexity of the solution and has to be tested very<br />

thoroughly.<br />

• Scheduling<br />

For both scenarios – CTP and ML-ATP – a subsequent scheduling step is<br />

necessary. Even though CTP performs a finite scheduling (either on detailed<br />

level or using a bucket capacity), the production sequence will be<br />

defined by the more or less arbitrary sequence of the sales orders and will<br />

most probably not meet the requirements for a production plan.<br />

• Time-Continuous CTP vs. Bucket-Oriented CTP<br />

There are two options how to perform the CTP check, one is the check<br />

based on a detailed finite scheduling, and the other one is to check the capacity<br />

based on a finite bucket capacity, which does not regard the detailed<br />

sequence of the orders <strong>with</strong>in the bucket. We recommend to prefer the<br />

bucket-oriented CTP to the time-continuous CTP whenever possible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!