Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...
Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...
Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Individuals Personalize <strong>Risk</strong><br />
<strong>Risk</strong>, to the scientist, is a continuum from low to high—not an<br />
absolute. Individuals hear the word risk <strong>and</strong> think danger. The word<br />
danger is defined as a thing that may cause injury, pain, etc.<br />
Each of us personalizes danger relative to any phenomenon that has<br />
the possibility of injuring us, our family, our community, or our environment.<br />
Our interpretation is based on our own experience, lifestyle, <strong>and</strong><br />
expectations. The critical question is whether the risk is important or<br />
dangerous to us or to people or things we care about.<br />
The Foundation of <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Communicating about pesticides <strong>and</strong> associated risks often is an<br />
uncomfortable process. As William Dury once said, “When your views<br />
on the world <strong>and</strong> your intellect are being challenged, <strong>and</strong> you begin to<br />
feel uncomfortable because of contradictions, <strong>and</strong> you have detected<br />
what is threatening your current model of the world or some aspect of it,<br />
pay attention—you are about to learn something.” If everyone followed<br />
Dury’s advice, risk communication would be simpler!<br />
Generally, before people are receptive to risk information, they must<br />
believe that the source of that information is credible <strong>and</strong> fair. So, when<br />
designing our message to convey pesticide risk, we must underst<strong>and</strong><br />
26