07.01.2013 Views

Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...

Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...

Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Individuals Personalize <strong>Risk</strong><br />

<strong>Risk</strong>, to the scientist, is a continuum from low to high—not an<br />

absolute. Individuals hear the word risk <strong>and</strong> think danger. The word<br />

danger is defined as a thing that may cause injury, pain, etc.<br />

Each of us personalizes danger relative to any phenomenon that has<br />

the possibility of injuring us, our family, our community, or our environment.<br />

Our interpretation is based on our own experience, lifestyle, <strong>and</strong><br />

expectations. The critical question is whether the risk is important or<br />

dangerous to us or to people or things we care about.<br />

The Foundation of <strong>Communication</strong><br />

Communicating about pesticides <strong>and</strong> associated risks often is an<br />

uncomfortable process. As William Dury once said, “When your views<br />

on the world <strong>and</strong> your intellect are being challenged, <strong>and</strong> you begin to<br />

feel uncomfortable because of contradictions, <strong>and</strong> you have detected<br />

what is threatening your current model of the world or some aspect of it,<br />

pay attention—you are about to learn something.” If everyone followed<br />

Dury’s advice, risk communication would be simpler!<br />

Generally, before people are receptive to risk information, they must<br />

believe that the source of that information is credible <strong>and</strong> fair. So, when<br />

designing our message to convey pesticide risk, we must underst<strong>and</strong><br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!