Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Acknowledgments We thank Steve Adduci for developing the wonderful illustrations in this publication; the Educational Endowment Fund of the American Chemical Society, and the Outdoor Residential Exposure Task Force for partially funding it; and, lastly, those persons who contributed their time and expertise in reviewing earlier drafts: Janet Ayres, Purdue University John Brady, The Ohio State University Chuck Curtis, The Ohio State University Tom Delaney, Professional Lawn Care Association of America Stephen Duke, United States Department of Agriculture Martha Filipic, The Ohio State University Charles Franklin, United States Environmental Protection Agency Robert Griffin, Marquette University Paul Guillebeau, University of Georgia Patricia Hipkins, Virginia Tech University Cherie Keen, Universiteit Maastricht, The Netherlands Rosemarie Neimeyer Hansell, Marion County Health Department Robert Peterson, Dow AgroSciences Amy Rummel, Alfred University Lisa Shaheen, Editor-in-Chief, Pest Control Christopher Sigurdson, Purdue University Richard Stuckey, Council For Agricultural Science and Technology Paul Thompson, Purdue University Robert Tinsworth, Jellinek, Schwartz & Connolly Scott Whitman, Colle & McVoy Susan Whitney, University of Delaware 50
52 New 11/2001 The information given herein is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service is implied. It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, David C. Petritz, Director, that all persons shall have equal opportunity and access to its programs and facilities without regard to race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, or disability. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action employer.
Page 1 and 2: PESTICIDES AND RISK COMMUNICATION I
Page 3 and 4: Introduction Communicating the comp
Page 5 and 6: they contribute significantly to ou
Page 7 and 8: Spring influenced the public, the f
Page 9 and 10: data are evaluated to determine whe
Page 11 and 12: Primary screening. Most manufacture
Page 13 and 14: hurt them, so it won’t hurt me.
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Perceptions of Risks from
Page 17 and 18: The Real Conflict: Pesticides Are S
Page 19 and 20: Pesticide manufacturers are require
Page 21 and 22: We Say Risk, They Hear Danger Every
Page 23 and 24: Do you fear the following? Responde
Page 25 and 26: the communication difficulties that
Page 27 and 28: Sorry, But I Need to Run Every prog
Page 29 and 30: questions and answers following you
Page 31 and 32: Explaining Essential Meanings of Co
Page 33 and 34: from their natural enemies: disease
Page 35 and 36: puzzling with regard to pesticide r
Page 37 and 38: The Old Way Doesn’t Work Anymore
Page 39 and 40: yourself with additional informatio
Page 41 and 42: communicating your interests: If yo
Page 43 and 44: It’s Show and Tell Time A picture
Page 45 and 46: I’ve Never Been Hurt! How can som
Page 47: Technical information alone will no

Pesticides and Risk Communication PPP-52 - Purdue Pesticide ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?