Magnetic Resonance in the Subsurface – 5th International ... - LIAG
Magnetic Resonance in the Subsurface – 5th International ... - LIAG
Magnetic Resonance in the Subsurface – 5th International ... - LIAG
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2D qt-<strong>in</strong>version to <strong>in</strong>vestigate spatial variations of hydraulic conductivity us<strong>in</strong>g SNMR 40<br />
2D qt-<strong>in</strong>version to <strong>in</strong>vestigate spatial variations of hydraulic conductivity<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g SNMR<br />
Raphael Dlugosch 1 , Thomas Gün<strong>the</strong>r, Mike Müller-Petke, and Ugur Yaramanci<br />
Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics (<strong>LIAG</strong>), Hannover<br />
1 Raphael.Dlugosch@liag-hannover.de<br />
Surface-NMR is able to detect water content <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> subsurface. Additionally, hydraulic<br />
conductivities can be estimated from NMR<br />
decay times (Legchenko et al. 2002, Dlugosch<br />
et al., 2011b). Both make SNMR a useful tool<br />
to answer hydrological questions. Most<br />
applications are 1D but SNMR has moved on<br />
to 2D targets (Hertrich et al., 2005; Hertrich et<br />
al., 2007) us<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive datasets while<br />
Girard et al. (2007) uses only co<strong>in</strong>cident loops.<br />
The development of multi channel<br />
<strong>in</strong>strumentation made comprehensive 2D<br />
datasets time efficient (Dlugosch et al., 2011a).<br />
Current 2D <strong>in</strong>versions focus on estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
water content distribution but do not <strong>in</strong>vert for<br />
spatial <strong>in</strong>formation of relaxation time T2*.<br />
Thus, estimation of hydraulic conductivity is<br />
yet undone. We present <strong>the</strong> development a<br />
robust <strong>in</strong>version to estimate a 2D distribution<br />
of T2*. F<strong>in</strong>ally, this enables to image spatial<br />
variations <strong>in</strong> hydraulic conductivity from<br />
SNMR data with a high lateral resolution.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>version is based on <strong>the</strong> qt-<strong>in</strong>version<br />
scheme (Müller-Petke and Yaramanci, 2010).<br />
It exploits <strong>the</strong> full measured free <strong>in</strong>duction<br />
decay data cube and <strong>in</strong>creases both spatial<br />
resolution and stability of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>verse problem.<br />
By account<strong>in</strong>g for separate transmitter and<br />
receiver loops an <strong>in</strong>creased lateral resolution is<br />
expected as shown by Hertrich et al. (2005).<br />
A challeng<strong>in</strong>g problem for a 2D <strong>in</strong>version of<br />
water content and decay time is <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>verse problem both at <strong>the</strong> model and data<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>. We use an irregular mesh and monoexponential<br />
decay per cell to m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>the</strong><br />
number of free parameter <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />
In addition <strong>the</strong> FID data is gate <strong>in</strong>tegrated to<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> dataset (Behroozmand<br />
et al., 2012). We present first prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
results of a syn<strong>the</strong>tic dataset.<br />
References<br />
Behroozmand, A. A., Auken, E., Fiandaca, G.,<br />
Christiansen, A. V. & Christensen, N. B. (2012):<br />
Efficient full decay <strong>in</strong>version of MRS data with a<br />
stretched-exponential approximation of <strong>the</strong><br />
distribution. Geophysical Journal <strong>International</strong>,<br />
Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, 190 (2), 900-912.<br />
Dlugosch, R., Müller-Petke, M., Gün<strong>the</strong>r, T.,<br />
Costabel, S. and Yaramanci, U., 2011a. Assessment<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Potential of a new Generation of surface<br />
NMR <strong>in</strong>struments, Near Surface Geophysics 9(2),<br />
123-134.<br />
Dlugosch, R., Müller-Petke, M., Gün<strong>the</strong>r, T.,<br />
Ronczka, M. and Yaramanci, U., 2011b. An<br />
extended model for predict<strong>in</strong>g hydraulic<br />
conductivity from NMR measurements. <strong>–</strong> EAGE<br />
Near Surface 2011, 12,-14.09.2011; Leicester<br />
Girard, J.-F., Boucher, M., Legchenko, A. &<br />
Baltassat, J.-M. (2007): 2D magnetic resonance<br />
tomography applied to karstic conduit imag<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Journal of Applied Geophysics, 63 (3-4), 103-116.<br />
Hertrich, M., Braun, M., Yaramanci, U., 2005.<br />
<strong>Magnetic</strong> resonance sound<strong>in</strong>gs with separated<br />
transmitter and receiver loops, Near Surface<br />
Geophysics 3(3), 131-144.<br />
Hertrich, M., Braun, M., Gün<strong>the</strong>r, T., Green, A.,<br />
Yaramanci, U., 2007. Surface Nuclear <strong>Magnetic</strong><br />
<strong>Resonance</strong> Tomography, IEEE Transactions on<br />
Geoscience and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g 45, 3752-3759.<br />
Legchenko, A., Baltassat, J.-M., Beauce, A.,<br />
Bernard, J. (2002): Nuclear magnetic resonance as<br />
a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of<br />
Applied Geophysics, 50 (1-2), 21-46.<br />
Müller-Petke, M., Yaramanci, U., 2010. QT<br />
<strong>in</strong>version - Comprehensive use of <strong>the</strong> complete<br />
surface NMR data set, Geophysics 75, WA199 -<br />
WA209.<br />
<strong>Magnetic</strong> <strong>Resonance</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Subsurface</strong> <strong>–</strong> 5 th <strong>International</strong> Workshop on <strong>Magnetic</strong> <strong>Resonance</strong><br />
Hannover, Germany, 25 <strong>–</strong> 27 September 2012