13.01.2013 Views

RIIO-T1 and GD1: Draft licence conditions – First informal ... - Ofgem

RIIO-T1 and GD1: Draft licence conditions – First informal ... - Ofgem

RIIO-T1 and GD1: Draft licence conditions – First informal ... - Ofgem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50<br />

<strong>RIIO</strong>-<strong>T1</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>GD1</strong>: <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>licence</strong> <strong>conditions</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>First</strong> <strong>informal</strong> <strong>licence</strong> drafting<br />

consultation<br />

with the <strong>conditions</strong> impacting allowed revenue through the annual<br />

iteration of the PCFM 70 <strong>and</strong> via the TOMOD term.<br />

(b) If entry or exit capacity is triggered, the revenue driver gives rise to<br />

additional allowed Totex expenditure <strong>–</strong> the PCFM variable value would<br />

be revised to reflect this<br />

(c) The additional allowed Totex would be modelled (including Totex<br />

Incentive Mechanism effects going forward) on the TO side <strong>and</strong> would<br />

adjust allowed revenue through the TOMOD term<br />

(d) Separately, the SO side of the business would charge the customers<br />

concerned in accordance with its current charging methodology <strong>–</strong><br />

meaning there would be no direct link between customers charges<br />

<strong>and</strong> allowed revenue on the TO side in any particular year in respect of<br />

these revenue drivers<br />

(e) NGGT would report the income under point d) as part of its actual TO<br />

income (rather than SO income as it does presently).<br />

� This preserves the existing charging structure whilst implementing the <strong>RIIO</strong><br />

approach.<br />

� We propose that permit provisions currently provided in C8D, 3(g) to (j) <strong>and</strong><br />

C8E, 5 are also treated under the TO revenue restriction rather than the SO<br />

(as at present) <strong>and</strong> will be part of a specific <strong>licence</strong> condition. In this case we<br />

propose that revenues would be recovered through TO rather than SO<br />

charges. See GTC 131:Delivery Incentive ,below for further details.<br />

� We propose that costs <strong>and</strong> revenues associated with Constrained LNG <strong>and</strong><br />

long-run contracting incentive, currently found in SpC C8E 1(c) <strong>and</strong> 1(e), will<br />

be captured through a new specific <strong>licence</strong> condition, see GTC132<br />

(Transmission Support Services). For the avoidance of doubt these revenues<br />

will continue to be funded through TO charges.<br />

3.38. Appendix 4 71 provides more detailed information on how the new proposed<br />

<strong>licence</strong> <strong>conditions</strong> are updating or replacing existing arrangements under the current<br />

condition.<br />

70<br />

For further details, please see chapter 6: The Annual Iteration Process for the Price Control Financial<br />

Model <strong>and</strong> updating of base revenue allowances<br />

71<br />

Appendix 4: Special Condition C8D: NTS gas entry incentives, costs <strong>and</strong> revenues <strong>and</strong> Special Condition<br />

C8E: NTS gas exit incentives, costs <strong>and</strong> revenues

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!