14.01.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

446 BROADBAND NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

Local TV<br />

Stations<br />

Figure 9.9<br />

National TV<br />

Networks<br />

Head End<br />

• •<br />

Coax Trunk<br />

Traditional analog CATV network, with tree - and - branch architecture.<br />

analog, coax - based, one - way networks for the downstream delivery of analog entertainment<br />

TV. Few changes occurred in CATV networks until the 1990s.<br />

Beginning in the mid - 1990s, a few large CATV providers began to upgrade their<br />

aging coaxial cable systems. As many of those networks were installed in the late<br />

1960s and early 1970s, they were in awful shape. Further, those networks were<br />

strained for capacity as the CATV providers sought to increase revenues and profi ts<br />

through the introduction of premium movie channels and Pay - Per - View (PPV). The<br />

upgrades, in some cases, went beyond simple coax upgrade and replacement to<br />

include optical fi ber in the trunk facilities from the head end to the neighborhood,<br />

where they terminated in an optoelectric conversion box that interfaced with the<br />

existing coax for ultimate termination at the premises.<br />

As the telecommunications domain in the United States was deregulated with<br />

the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the CATV providers began to consider operating<br />

as CLECs. The technology existed to upgrade the coaxial cable system to support<br />

two - way communications through frequency splitting and advanced signal modulation<br />

techniques, much as is done over twisted pair in xDSL technologies. The coax<br />

amplifi ers and set - top boxes could be upgraded as well. Further, the system could<br />

be converted to digital by replacing the amplifi ers with repeaters, and TDM channels<br />

could run inside the FDM channels, much like xDSL. The coax cable certainly offers<br />

much more in the way of bandwidth and distance than does twisted pair, and with<br />

an upgrade, error performance could be improved to levels that would make twisted<br />

pair pale by comparison. With optical fi ber in the long - haul portion of the network<br />

(i.e., from the head end to the neighborhood), it became clear that CATV systems<br />

could compete very effectively with the ILEC local loop. Further, the largely unregulated<br />

CATV providers could not be forced to wholesale their local loops to com-<br />

Coax<br />

Bridge<br />

Distribution<br />

Tap

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!