GMSWORKS-3 Peace River Side Channel Restoration - BC Hydro
GMSWORKS-3 Peace River Side Channel Restoration - BC Hydro
GMSWORKS-3 Peace River Side Channel Restoration - BC Hydro
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6 <strong>Side</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong><br />
<strong>Side</strong> channels are generated through cyclic or episodic changes in river planform brought about<br />
by physical river processes. Continued morphological processes result in the creation, evolution<br />
and eventual loss of these channels through time, and interruption of one or more of the many<br />
processes can impact side channels. <strong>Side</strong> channels have been recognized as critical aquatic<br />
habitat, and side channel restoration activities for fish habitat restoration have been practiced<br />
in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) for over 20 years. Many of these projects include:<br />
� Excavation of inlet channels to re‐water side channel habitats,<br />
� Construction of small intake and pipe systems to re‐water side channels,<br />
� Excavation and construction of new open water‐fed connected side channels in the<br />
floodplain, and<br />
� Construction of groundwater‐fed side channels in floodplains.<br />
Within all these works, the complexing of side channels with either wood debris or large<br />
substrate, and modifications of the channel structure by construction of pools or riffles, have<br />
been implemented to improve the fish habitat. Most of these works have been implemented<br />
on relatively small coastal and interior watersheds, and relatively little significant restoration<br />
has been implemented on rivers of a magnitude similar to the <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong>. Typical restoration<br />
drawings for habitat complexing and bank protection have been included in the Appendices.<br />
A contemporary analogue is the lower Fraser <strong>River</strong>, where channel modifications and gravel<br />
removal for the purpose of maintaining flood capacity have been implemented. These works<br />
have involved opening relic channels to flow and constructing large channels through bars.<br />
These works are temporary, however, and have not been constructed as permanent features.<br />
Another example is the Nechako <strong>River</strong>, where the construction and assessment of habitat<br />
complexing works for compensation of lost productivity resulting from a reduction in flows has<br />
been studied (NFCP, 1996). These works have been constructed on a river system dissimilar<br />
from the <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong> as it not is subject to a highly variable flow regime, and has much lower<br />
peak flows and mean annual flow.<br />
Following the classification of side channels in the study reach, the following potential<br />
restoration options have been identified. These options are used in the individual assessment<br />
of sites identified in Section 7.<br />
6.1 Permanent Open <strong>Side</strong> <strong>Channel</strong>s<br />
These channels contain flow through the current range of flows from PCN, but regulation<br />
impacts may have reduced the productive capacity of habitats. The following options can be<br />
considered:<br />
<strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Side</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> 16