GMSWORKS-3 Peace River Side Channel Restoration - BC Hydro
GMSWORKS-3 Peace River Side Channel Restoration - BC Hydro
GMSWORKS-3 Peace River Side Channel Restoration - BC Hydro
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 Summary and Recommendations<br />
8.1 Site Prioritization<br />
A short list of side channel restoration sites has been developed, with a preliminary rating<br />
provided for each site and two side channels were identified with the highest rating. A<br />
summary table for the site assessments and conceptual costing tables are provided in the<br />
Appendices. The costs presented are at a conceptual level based on the assumed size of the<br />
restored channel and assumed unit rates.<br />
<strong>Side</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> 23L and 32L were identified as the sites with the highest overall rating based on<br />
the overview assessment carried out under this study. The 23L site was selected due to the fact<br />
that it current dry under the regulated flow regime, and restoration of the area would create<br />
new back channel habitat. The area is relatively small and accessible. The 32L site was selected<br />
due to excellent access, sufficient area available, and good potential to create both open<br />
connected side channel habitat and backwater closed side channel habitat within the same<br />
area.<br />
Based on the study team recommendations, the 32L site represents the best opportunity of all<br />
the sites assessed. If restoration opportunities are pursued in the future, and concepts for this<br />
site should be developed further. The sites should be reviewed, and prioritized in terms of:<br />
1. Review of conceptual costing and available budget to undertake restoration projects in<br />
2010/2011;<br />
2. Review of existing land tenure and available access to the proposed sites; and<br />
3. Permitting and regulatory approvals required in 2010/2011 for project construction.<br />
8.2 Information and Data Gaps<br />
Considerable gaps exist in the physical data available to assess and evaluate side channel sites<br />
along the <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong>. Some of these gaps can be addressed in the short term through existing<br />
programs (e.g., <strong>GMSWORKS</strong>‐5 and ‐6) or through dedicated surveys and studies. The following<br />
list identifies these items:<br />
1. Stage‐discharge rating curves and a hydraulic model of the reach will be available<br />
to estimate water surface elevations along the <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong> reach where the<br />
proposed side channels are situated. The rating curves and model could be used<br />
with existing survey data to determine the invert and channel elevations<br />
required to re‐water existing and restored side channels under the current PCN<br />
flow regime. This data may influence the priority of site selection.<br />
2. <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> has recently flown three sets of aerial photographs to document fish<br />
habitat conditions on <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong> at varying river discharges (<strong>GMSWORKS</strong>‐4).<br />
Two or more sets of air photos are scheduled for 2010. These aerial photos<br />
should be obtained for each candidate restoration site, digitally scanned, and<br />
<strong>Peace</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Side</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> 32