16.01.2013 Views

Official Show Guide - director-e

Official Show Guide - director-e

Official Show Guide - director-e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PPE<br />

Comfort and performance are the ultimate priorities when it<br />

comes to protective clothing but, as no one wants to wear a highvis<br />

bin liner, we include small but practical details in our clothing<br />

protection against heat and flames, EN 1149 for<br />

electrostatic recharging, high visibility standard<br />

EN 471 and has basic protection against liquid<br />

chemicals.<br />

Although existing garments made to EN 531 can<br />

still be produced, sold and used in the market, all<br />

new FR garments developed today must meet the<br />

new standards: EN ISO 11612, which replaces EN<br />

531 for heat and flame protection, and EN ISO<br />

11611, which replaces EN 470-1 for small molten<br />

metal splashes. Praybourne’s new FR range, out in<br />

April, has been tested to the new standards, and<br />

consists of a combat style coverall and trouser<br />

with removable knee pads, combat pockets and<br />

reflective piping. Made from the inherently flame<br />

retardant fibre Protex ® , even the garment’s antistatic<br />

properties are designed to be hardwearing.<br />

“The anti-static fibre is pure steel as opposed to<br />

carbon but this doesn’t mean that it’s rigid,”<br />

Praybourne’s Stuart Jukes says. “It’s very soft to<br />

touch but, because it’s steel, it makes the fabric<br />

much harder-wearing.”<br />

On the future of thermal protection, Phil Moore<br />

says: “The FR market has become more pricecompetitive<br />

due to the influx of products coming in<br />

from the Far East. Because of this, I believe that<br />

the trend for European manufacturers to develop<br />

more technical garments will continue in order to<br />

add value and maintain it as a premium product at<br />

a premium price.”<br />

But as for end-users, Stuart Jukes believes that<br />

lower cost products will still have a place in the<br />

market. “It depends what the buyer is trying to<br />

achieve and what they can afford. If you want<br />

something to last, a garment made from an<br />

inherent FR fibre is great but, if you need to throw<br />

something away on a regular basis because you<br />

have a high staff turnover, a lower cost FR treated<br />

fabric could be more suitable, as long as it comes<br />

with a certificate.”<br />

The compromise of chemical protection<br />

When it comes to chemical protection, comfort is<br />

still about compromise. Paul Bryce from<br />

Microgard, one of the world’s first manufacturers<br />

Cooling vest<br />

from Microgard<br />

of limited life protective workwear, says:<br />

“People talk about breathable chemical<br />

protection but this can be a<br />

contradiction in terms. The common<br />

definition of a breathable fabric is that<br />

it allows moisture vapour or air to<br />

pass through. In order to achieve this<br />

“breathable” protective clothing fabrics<br />

are often microporous (full of tiny holes<br />

or fissures). So there is a greater risk<br />

that a chemical, in liquid or particle form,<br />

may penetrate the fabric.”<br />

“Equally, many flame retardant<br />

products that are currently on<br />

the market offer fairly basic<br />

chemical protection. Often<br />

when working with more<br />

complex hazardous<br />

chemicals, you have to<br />

compromise on the flame<br />

retardant properties of<br />

the garment. It is<br />

therefore important that<br />

when considering<br />

protective clothing a<br />

safety professional<br />

conducts a risk<br />

assessment to evaluate<br />

whether the highest risk<br />

to the workforce is the<br />

potential for contact with<br />

heat and flame or exposure<br />

to hazardous chemicals.”<br />

So, where does chemical<br />

protective clothing go from<br />

here? Paul says: “In terms of<br />

materials, we are looking to<br />

maintain, and if at all possible<br />

improve, the level of protection<br />

that is being offered whilst<br />

increasing wearer comfort. In<br />

chemical protection, that’s always a<br />

trade-off.” One way of achieving this,<br />

however, is by developing chemical<br />

protective garments that are more<br />

compatible with other PPE. “We’ve spent<br />

a lot of time over the last few years trying<br />

to keep up with the latest full face mark<br />

respirators to make sure that our hoods fit<br />

and move with the wearer, as opposed to<br />

restricting their vision or creating a gap<br />

between the respirator and the garment<br />

which could compromise the protection<br />

level,” Paul adds.<br />

Another way of increasing wearer comfort is<br />

to reduce the effects of heat stress<br />

produced from wearing a chemical suit for a<br />

long period. While breathability may have to<br />

be compromised in favour of higher chemical<br />

protection, Microgard’s new cooling vest,<br />

launched at the end of February, is certainly<br />

one way of balancing the body’s<br />

temperature. Featuring phase change gel<br />

cooling inserts, which offer a cool 14 C for<br />

up to three hours, according to Microgard<br />

these are a welcome alternative to the<br />

Pulsar FR hi-vis polo shirt and<br />

FR antistatic combat<br />

trousers from Praybourne<br />

42 www.<strong>director</strong>-e.com www.fabric<strong>director</strong>-e.com www.workwearshow.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!