Strange Scholarship in the Wegman Report - Get a Free Blog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Strange Scholarship in the Wegman Report V1.0 09/26/10 4(a) Problems Entity to Ask Barton Whitfield Stearns Spencer MM TT+CO Coffey Wegman Said Scott Rigsby Reeves Sharabati Rezazad Rapp McShane Wyner 34 Potential Problems, *'d are marginal, shown as reminders. Refer Who 1 U Southern California? X Rapp(2008)
Strange Scholarship in the Wegman Report V1.0 09/26/10 4(b) Questions Barton Whitfield Spencer CO other MM TT+CO Coffey Wegman Said Scott Rigsby Reeves Sharabati 4th Unk Various Questions Chronology in A.5 may be useful reference Sections 1 X X X ? ? ? How was Wegman recommended? 2 X X X ? ? How was Coffey selected to contact Wegman? 3 X X What was the real charter from Coffey 09/01/05? 4 X X X X When did others get recruited? What were they told? 5 ? Who was the 4th person, when did he or she drop out? Why? [SAI2007] 6 X X X ? ? ? ? Who attended kickoff meeting with Spencer? 7 X ? When did Scott actually get asked for Appendix A? 8 X X ? ? X X X ? ? For each reference, who really suggested it? 9 X X X X X US Climate Change Workshop, who did WP talk to? A.5 10 X X X WP worked directly with McIntyre. How about McKitrick? 11 X When did Spencer know about Wahl, Amman(2006)? 12 X X When did WP know about it? 13 X X ? ? Who actually did the plagiarism on each section? W.2, W.11 14 ? ? X X Who edited the Biases in? W.2.3, W.11 15 ? ? ? X X X X Who wrote each part (besides Scott's App. A)? Any from outside? 16 ? ? ? X X Did anyone other than the "reviewers" review&comment? A.1 17 X X X Did Sharabati contribute to WR itself, not just [SHA2006]? 18 X Wiley Computational Statistics shows SAID @ Oklahoma St U? A.6.5 19 St. Louis Fed Reserve: why does Anderson do anti-science? W.8.8 20 J. Economic Methodology: climate peer review? (Anderson) W.8.8 21 Drexel U: why does McCullough write climate anti-science? W.8.8 22 X X GMU: Why did [SAI2007, p.23] call GMU meeting a "Bad One"? [SAI2007] 35
Page 1 and 2: Strange Scholarship in the Wegman R
Page 33: Strange Scholarship in the Wegman R
Page 85 and 86:
Strange Scholarship in the Wegman R
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
show all

Strange Scholarship in the Wegman Report - Get a Free Blog

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?