The Poor Responder – New Medical Treatment Poor Responders ...
The Poor Responder – New Medical Treatment Poor Responders ...
The Poor Responder – New Medical Treatment Poor Responders ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Poor</strong> <strong>Responder</strong> <strong>–</strong><br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Treatment</strong><br />
Prof Ehud Margalioth<br />
Director IVF unit<br />
Shaare Zedek <strong>Medical</strong> Center<br />
Dr. Jordana Hyman<br />
<strong>Poor</strong> <strong>Responder</strong>s<br />
�� 10-15% 10 15% of women undergoing IVF have a poor response<br />
to ovarian stimulation<br />
�� Advanced maternal age<br />
�� Premature ovarian failure<br />
�� Decreased ovarian reserve due to:<br />
�� Genetics<br />
�� Surgery<br />
�� Endometriosis<br />
�� Radiation<br />
�� Chemotherapy<br />
�� affects egg production<br />
�� affects oocyte quality<br />
�� Low pregnancy rate irrespective of treatment
2<br />
How do we define a poor responder<br />
� AGE<br />
� CLINICAL<br />
� No of follicles : 1 - 4 , No of oocytes : 1 - 4<br />
� Peak Estradiol levels: < 500 pg/ml<br />
� Excessive requirements of gonadotropins: > 450 IU<br />
� TESTS<br />
� Basal day 3 FSH<br />
� CC challenge test<br />
� Inhibin B<br />
� AMH<br />
� Ovarian Volume<br />
� Antral follicle count<br />
Evaluation and management of low<br />
responders in IVF - reviews<br />
�� Evaluation and <strong>Treatment</strong> of Low <strong>Responder</strong>s in Assisted Reproductive Reproductive<br />
Technology<br />
SOZOS J. FASOULIOTIS, ALEX SIMON, and NERI LAUFER<br />
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Vol. 17, No. 7, 2000<br />
� Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review<br />
B.C.Tarlatzis1, L.Zepiridis, G.Grimbizis and J.Bontis<br />
Human Reproduction Update, Vol.9, No.1 pp. 61±76, 2003<br />
� Interventions for ’poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in invitro<br />
fertilisation (IVF) (Review)<br />
Shanbhag S, Aucott L, Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MA, McTavish AR<br />
<strong>The</strong> Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 3
3<br />
FASOULIOTIS, ALEX SIMON, and NERI LAUFER<br />
2000<br />
•Ovulation induction protocols<br />
<strong>–</strong>Cc-hmg<br />
<strong>–</strong>High dose FSH / HMG<br />
<strong>–</strong>GnRH agonists<br />
<strong>–</strong>Minidose GnRHa<br />
<strong>–</strong>GH supplementation<br />
<strong>–</strong>Glucocorticoids<br />
<strong>–</strong>Oral contraceptives<br />
<strong>–</strong>Natural cycle<br />
• Blastocyst transfer<br />
• Assisted hatching<br />
• Co-culture<br />
• IVM
4<br />
B.C.Tarlatzis et al 2003<br />
Management<br />
� High doses of gonadotrophins<br />
� Use of recombinant FSH versus purified urinary FSH<br />
� Luteal initiation of FSH<br />
� Flare-up GnRH agonist regimens: short and ultra-short protocols<br />
� Standard-dose flare-up regimens<br />
� Reduced-dose GnRH agonist flare-up regimens<br />
� Luteal initiation of GnRH agonist regimens<br />
� GnRH antagonist regimens<br />
� Adjunctive use of GH or GH-releasing factor or pyridostigmine<br />
� Adjunctive use of glucocorticosteroids (dexamethasone)<br />
� Adjunctive use of nitric oxide (NO)-donors (L-arginine)<br />
� Pretreatment with COC or progestogens<br />
� Routine use of ICSI<br />
� Natural cycle<br />
Tarlatzis conclusions<br />
In conclusion, there is a clear need to standardize the<br />
defenitions of low ovarian response. Well-designed,<br />
large-scale,randomized, controlled trials are needed to<br />
assess the eficacy ofthe different management<br />
strategies.<br />
<strong>The</strong> current results which are available are perhaps<br />
somewhat disappointing, but this should not be too<br />
surprising as most poor ovarian response women<br />
appear to have occult ovarian failure.<br />
Thus, the exhausted ovarian apparatusis unable to react<br />
to any stimulation, no matter how powerful this might be.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ideal stimulation for poor responders still<br />
remains a challenge, as the hypothesized diminished<br />
oocyte cohort and poor oocyte quality cannot be<br />
reversed within the limits of our present capabilities.
5<br />
Cochrane (Jan 2007) conclusion….<br />
conclusion<br />
�� NO CLEAR EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT<br />
ANY PARTICULAR INTERVENTION<br />
�� “it it is not possible to recommend any<br />
intervention to replace the currently used<br />
conventional long protocol..” protocol..<br />
<strong>Treatment</strong> of low responders by<br />
ART<br />
�� Ovarian stimulation protocols<br />
�� Long agonist<br />
�� Short agonist<br />
�� Ultrashort agonjst<br />
�� Stop<br />
�� Microdose<br />
�� Different agonist<br />
�� Antagonist<br />
�� Agonist antagonist<br />
�� FSH vs HMG<br />
�� LH<br />
• Clomiphen<br />
• No analogs only<br />
gonadotropins<br />
• GH<br />
• Natural cycle
6<br />
<strong>New</strong>er <strong>The</strong>rapies<br />
�� Testosterone<br />
�� Letrozole<br />
�� Luteal estradiol<br />
�� AACEP<br />
�� Recombinant LH<br />
�� Aspirin<br />
�� OCP<br />
�� L-arginine arginine (1999)<br />
�� Prolactin Supplementation<br />
�� Natural cycle<br />
�� CAM <strong>–</strong> complementary and alternative medicine<br />
�� Donor oocytes<br />
Relevent stimulation protocols<br />
�� Long agonist<br />
�� Microdose agonist<br />
�� Natural cycle<br />
�� Agonist - antagonist
7<br />
Microdose analog<br />
�� Oral contraception<br />
�� Third day of OC cessation start 0.005 mg<br />
Decapeptyl twice daily<br />
�� FSH (+ ( HMG) 450 <strong>–</strong> 750 IU daily from 2 nd<br />
day of Deca<br />
Schoolcraft, W et al Fertility Sterility 1997 Microdose + GH<br />
�� Paired analysis of 32 poor responders,
8<br />
Comparison of cycles<br />
1- LONG PROTOCOL<br />
ALL CYCLES CANCELLED DUE TO POOR RESPONSE<br />
(E2 < 100 or fewer than 4 follicles after 5 days GT stimulation)<br />
2 <strong>–</strong> EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL :<br />
OCP for 21 days<br />
GnRH agonist + GH from 3 days after cessation of OCP<br />
until hCG<br />
FSH from 3 rd day of GnRH/GH, GnRH/GH,<br />
until at least two oocytes<br />
18mm+<br />
32 cycles <strong>–</strong> 28 continued, 4 cancelled<br />
• 28 cycles<br />
14 pregnancies !
9<br />
Detti et al, Fertility Sterility 2005 microdose<br />
�� 48 consecutive women, underwent 61 cycles of<br />
treatment<br />
�� 5 year period<br />
�� Age >38<br />
�� Less than 4 oocytes<br />
�� Peak E2 < 500 pg/ml<br />
�� Elevated FSH (>13)<br />
�� Previously cancelled cycle<br />
I <strong>–</strong> Stop protocol<br />
II <strong>–</strong> Microdose flare protocol<br />
III <strong>–</strong> Short agonist flare<br />
• No statistically significant findings<br />
• Trend towards higher implantation, clinical pregnancy and<br />
delivered pregnancy rate in Microdose group
10<br />
Franco, JG Jr et al, Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 2006<br />
�� Meta-analysis Meta analysis of 6 trials,<br />
comparing GnRH agonist and<br />
antagonist treatment for poor<br />
responders<br />
�� Antagonist <strong>–</strong> Multiple low dose<br />
antagonist (0.25 mg)<br />
�� Agonist <strong>–</strong> long protocol <strong>–</strong> 2<br />
- microdose flare <strong>–</strong> 4<br />
microdose<br />
�� No difference between GnRH agonist or<br />
antagonist in terms of cycle cancellation rate,<br />
number of mature oocytes, or pregnancy rate<br />
�� In analysis of GnRH agonist microdose flare vs<br />
antagonist (4 trials) - significantly higher rate of<br />
oocytes retreived in GnRH-a GnRH a flare cycles<br />
�� no difference in pregnancy outcomes<br />
�� More trials needed
11<br />
Agonist - antagonist<br />
Orvieto: Orvieto:<br />
�� 3 days of Deca 0.1 from 1 st day of period<br />
�� Maximal FSH dose from day 3<br />
�� Flexible antagonist<br />
�� 21 cases, 3 ongoing (%14.3) pregnancies.<br />
Shaare Zedek protocol<br />
Deca 0.1 from day 21 to period and stop<br />
Start maximal FSH dose on day 2<br />
Antagonist when leading follicle > 13mm<br />
Natural cycle<br />
�� Pelnick et al Netherlands Hum Repro 9/2007<br />
�� 1048 cycles 256 women<br />
�� Preganancy rate 8% per cycle 20% per ET<br />
�� After 9 cycles CPR of 44%<br />
�� <strong>Poor</strong> responders:<br />
�� Frequently ovulate on smaller follicles<br />
�� Lower E2, lower fertilization rate<br />
�� Our unit 43% pregancy rate < 38
12<br />
<strong>New</strong> therapies - <strong>Medical</strong><br />
�� Testosterone<br />
�� Letrozole<br />
�� Luteal estradiol<br />
�� AACEP<br />
�� OCP<br />
�� Recombinant LH<br />
�� Aspirin<br />
�� L-arginine arginine<br />
�� Prolactin Supplementation<br />
�� CAM <strong>–</strong> complementary and alternative medicine<br />
�� Donor oocytes<br />
Androgen <strong>The</strong>rapy<br />
�� Transdermal Testosterone<br />
�� DHEA<br />
�� 2 cell, 2 GT theory <strong>–</strong> androgen substrate<br />
undergoes aromatization to estrogen<br />
�� Direct autocrine/paracrine effect in regulation of<br />
follicular function<br />
�� Low basal testosterone may predict poor IVF<br />
outcome (Frattarelli, JL & Peterson, EH. Effect of androgen levels on IVF IVF<br />
cycles, Fertil Steril 2004, 81, 1713-4) 1713 4)
13<br />
Balasch, J et al, Human Reproduction, 2006;21(7), 1884<br />
�� 25 women, with past 2 treatment cycles cancelled<br />
due to poor response<br />
�� Transdermal testosterone treatment for 5 days before<br />
GT (20mg/kg/day)<br />
� RESULTS: Twenty patients (80%) showed an<br />
increase of over fivefold in the number of<br />
recruited follicles, produced 5.8 oocytes,<br />
received two or three embryos and achieved a<br />
clinical pregnancy rate of 30% per OPU.<br />
� <strong>The</strong>re were 20% cancelled cycles.<br />
Marked improvement in E2, no of<br />
follicles, p < 0.005
14<br />
Testosterone cycle<br />
�� Less GT stimulation required<br />
�� Increased antral follicle count<br />
�� Increased serum androstenedione and<br />
IGF-1 IGF 1 in non-cancelled non cancelled vs cancelled<br />
(refelcting ovarian responsiveness to GT<br />
stimulation)<br />
Massin, N et al, Human Reproduction 2006<br />
�� Supplementation at time of recruitment might increase small antral antral<br />
follicle count and<br />
improve follicular sensitivity to FSH<br />
�� 53 women <strong>–</strong> 2 IVF cycles - before and after transdermal testosterone/placebo<br />
(randomized)<br />
�� <strong>Treatment</strong> of 1g/day for 15-20 15 20 days before the second stimulation, stimulation,<br />
during GnRH<br />
downregulation<br />
�� Significant increase in plasma testosterone for women treated with with<br />
testosterone<br />
compared with placebo<br />
�� No significant difference in plasma FSH, LH, AMH, inhibin B, estradiol, estradiol,<br />
Δ4-androstenedione androstenedione or antral follicle count<br />
� No significant difference in number of follicles, oocytes or embryos, but trend towards<br />
better outcome
15<br />
DHEA supplementation<br />
Casson et al 2000, Dehydropiandrosterone supplementation augments augments<br />
ovarian stimulation in<br />
poor responders : a case series. Human Reproduction. 15(10). 2129 212<br />
�� First documentation of DHEA supplementation for diminished ovarian ovarian<br />
reserve in<br />
women 35-40 35 40 wt decreased ovarian sensitivity to FSH<br />
�� Prospective case series of 5 women undergoing ovarian stimulation stimulation<br />
before and<br />
after DHEAS supplementation (80mg/day for 2 months)<br />
�� Gonadotropin response almost doubled<br />
- DHEA and DHEAS concentrations fall progressively wt age<br />
- DHEA administration results in increased serum IGF-1 IGF<br />
- DHEA is a steroid prohormone for ovarian follicular sex steroidogenesis<br />
steroidogenesis<br />
�� *** <strong>Treatment</strong> in case and control cycles not identical + poor statistical statistical<br />
analysis ( see <strong>–</strong> Weerinf, HGI, Gutknect DR and<br />
Schats R - Augmentation of ovarian response by dehydroepiandrosterone, Human Human<br />
Reproduction 2001 16(7) 1537<br />
Case Report: Barad and Gleicher<br />
Barad,D & Gleicher n , Increased oocyte production after treatment treatment<br />
with<br />
dehydroepiandrosterone, Fertility Sterility 2005 84(3) 756<br />
�� Case report of 42 year old women, decreased<br />
ovarian reserve<br />
�� Undergoing treatment for embryo<br />
cryopreservation for future aneuploidy screen<br />
�� self treated with DHEA supplement as well as<br />
acupuncture<br />
�� Continual improvement in peak E2, oocytes<br />
retreived, embryos cryopreserved
16<br />
DHEA pre-treatment pre treatment and Ovulation<br />
Induction for IVF among women with a<br />
history of decreased ovarian reserve<br />
Barad, Gleicher<br />
Retrospective cohort study of women treated<br />
with DHEA<br />
�� 25 mg td for 4-48 4 48 weeks<br />
�� 76 cycles in 45 women, 43 before and 33 after<br />
treatment<br />
�� Increased oocyte yield and high quality<br />
oocytes<br />
DHEA<br />
�� ASRM Washington DC 200 cases no<br />
significant side effects about 30%<br />
pregnancy rate<br />
�� Shaare Zedek 40 cases 10 pregnancies<br />
�� Prospective controlled study about to<br />
begin with Prof Shulman (IVF Meir)
17<br />
LETROZOLE <strong>–</strong> Aromatase Inhibitor<br />
�� Low responder <strong>–</strong> lower expression of FSH in<br />
granulosa cells<br />
�� Letrozole <strong>–</strong> aromatase inhibitor <strong>–</strong><br />
- temporary accumulation of intraovarian<br />
androgens,<br />
→ Induces a “PCO PCO-like like” state of high follicular<br />
and serum LH and androgens<br />
→ enhanced follicullar recruitment<br />
- blocks E2 synthesis <strong>–</strong> decreased negative<br />
feedback at pituitary level<br />
Garcia-Velasco, Garcia Velasco, J et al, Fertility Sterility 2005<br />
�� Prospective pilot sudy of 147 women with past<br />
IVF failure in at least one cycle<br />
- 4 or less oocytes OR<br />
- E2
18<br />
�� Higher implantation rate <strong>–</strong> statistically significant<br />
�� Higher pregnancy rate <strong>–</strong> not significant<br />
�� Increased follicular fluid testosterone and<br />
androstrenedione in treatment group<br />
�� Increased substrate for estrogen<br />
�� Promote early follicular growth and proliferation of<br />
theca and granulosa cells<br />
�� Androgens stimulate IGF and IGF-1 IGF 1 receptor gene<br />
expression, promoting follicular steroidogenesis
19<br />
Schoolcraft, WB et al, Fertility Sterility 2007<br />
�� Prospective controlled trial, 578 poor responders<br />
�� Assigned in 2:1 ratio to ML or AL protocol<br />
ML <strong>–</strong> microdose GnRH agonist flare<br />
AL <strong>–</strong> letrozole (day 3-8) 3 8) and GnRH antagonist<br />
(from lead follicle 14mm)<br />
microdose<br />
��No No advantage for letrozole/antagonist letrozole/antagonist<br />
protocol<br />
Letrozol and antagonist<br />
��Increased Increased follicular fluid androgens may have negative effect on oocyte quality
20<br />
LH<br />
Barrenetxea, G, Fertil Steril 2007<br />
�� Prospective randomized controlled trial,<br />
84 women<br />
A <strong>–</strong> GnRH agonist + rFSH<br />
B <strong>–</strong> GnRH agonist + rFSH + rLH<br />
No clinical or stastically siginificant benefit seen<br />
Clinical effects of ovulation induction with rFSH supplemented with rLH or low-dose low dose rHCG<br />
in the midfollicular phase in microdose cycles in poor responders.<br />
responders<br />
Fertil Steril. Steril.<br />
2007 Sep;88(3):665-9.<br />
Sep;88(3):665 9. Berkkanoglu M, , Isikoglu M, , Aydin D, , Ozgur K.<br />
Antalya In Vitro Fertilization, Antalya, Turkey<br />
�� 145 women AFC
21<br />
Keltz, M et al, fertility Sterility 2007<br />
שומ י של ל נויצר<br />
ת ול ולגב<br />
�� OCP <strong>–</strong> used to synchronize folliclar development<br />
and prevent spontaneous LH surge<br />
�� May eliminate CL and restore sensitivity to FSH<br />
in the poor responder<br />
�� OCP may result in hypothalamic and<br />
gonadotropic suppression following cessation,<br />
leading to blunting of the<br />
flare response to GnRH<br />
�� 19 poor responders, divided into <strong>–</strong><br />
A <strong>–</strong> pretreatment wt OCP, then GnRH<br />
agonist flare protocol<br />
B <strong>–</strong> GnRH flare protocol only<br />
�� Comparison of FSH, LH and P after one<br />
day of treatment with GnRHa
22<br />
�� OCP suppresses pre-GnRH pre GnRH-a a FSH but does not blunt flare effect on<br />
FSH<br />
�� OCP blunts LH flare, may reduce early rise in follicular androgens,<br />
androgens,<br />
providing optimum environment for follicular growth<br />
�� Pregnancy rate <strong>–</strong> OCP pretreatment <strong>–</strong> 41.7%<br />
no pretreatment <strong>–</strong> 28.6% (p <strong>–</strong> 0.19)
23<br />
רובע הדות<br />
. הבשקהה<br />
? תולאש שי<br />
םוכיס<br />
י תל חש י ורי גל ל ו קו ט ו רפ ףאל חכ ו מ ן ו רתי ן י א<br />
PR<br />
-ב<br />
ב רתויב חיכשה ונה<br />
microdose agonist<br />
-ה<br />
-ב<br />
ב וא ןורטסוטסט תוקבדמב שומישהש<br />
הוקת<br />
שי<br />
דיתעב ומצע תא חיכוי<br />
Letrozol<br />
-ב<br />
ב וא<br />
DHEA<br />
��<br />
��<br />
��
24<br />
Frattarelli, J et al, Fertility sterility 2007<br />
�� Retrospective cohort study of 1250 poor-<br />
responder women undergoing IVF<br />
�� Aspirin<br />
→ decreased platelet production of PGG<br />
→ lower level of Thromboxane<br />
→ vasodilation, increased blood flow in ovarian<br />
arteries<br />
→ improved quality of oocytes, higher<br />
implantation, pregnancy and live-birth live birth rates<br />
�� Step down protocol<br />
�� 417 women were treated with 81mg<br />
aspirin beginning during month prior to IVF<br />
cycle<br />
833 underwent standard protocol only
25<br />
�� Higher peak estradiol, total days of<br />
stimulation, total GT dose required and<br />
number of follicles >14mm on day of hCG<br />
in group treated with aspirin<br />
�� No difference in implantation, pregnancy<br />
or live-birth live birth rates<br />
�� Increase in antral follicle count may be<br />
offset by inhibition of prostaglandin and<br />
decreased implantation rate
26<br />
Adjuvant L-arginine L arginine treatment for<br />
IVF in poor responders<br />
Battaglia, C et al, Human Reproduction, 1999<br />
�� Pre-cursor Pre cursor of nitric oxide<br />
�� Vasodilation → increased blood flow in ovarian arteries<br />
�� 34 poor responders, divided into :<br />
I - GnRH-a GnRH a + FSH<br />
II - GnRH-a GnRH a + FSH + L-arginine L arginine (daily supplementation<br />
until hCG)<br />
�� Hormone, US + Doppler<br />
�� arginine, citrulline, nitrite, nitrate and IGF-1 IGF<br />
�� 3 pregnancies in L-arginine L arginine group, all early pregnancy<br />
loss, none in control group<br />
�� Increased no oocytes<br />
�� Increased no ET<br />
�� Lower cancellation rates<br />
�� Significant Doppler flow improvement in uterine and<br />
perifollicular arteries <strong>–</strong> decreased blood flow resistance<br />
�� Inverse corretlation btwn doppler doppler PI and and estradiol estradiol<br />
concentration<br />
�� Significantly higher concentrations of <strong>–</strong> L-arginine, arginine, L-<br />
citrulline, nitrite, nitrate and IGF-1<br />
IGF
27<br />
<strong>New</strong> therapies - <strong>Medical</strong><br />
�� Testosterone<br />
�� Letrozole<br />
�� Luteal estradiol<br />
�� AACEP<br />
�� Recombinant LH<br />
�� Aspirin<br />
�� OCP<br />
�� L-arginine arginine<br />
�� Prolactin Supplementation<br />
�� Natural cycle<br />
�� CAM <strong>–</strong> complementary and alternative medicine<br />
�� Donor oocytes<br />
�� COCHRANE, 2006,<br />
Shanbhag, S
28<br />
Effect of deydroepiandrosterone on oocyte and embryo<br />
yields, embryo grade and cell number in IVF<br />
Barad and Gleicher, Human Reproduction, 2006<br />
�� Case control <strong>–</strong> paired analysis of 25 women undergoing undergoing<br />
IVF before and after DHEA<br />
�� 75 mg tds for 17.6 wks (+/- (+/ 2.13)<br />
�� Increase in <strong>–</strong> fertilized oocytes, normal day 3 embryos,<br />
embryos transferred and average embryo score per<br />
oocyte, (p value
29<br />
RECOMBINANT LH<br />
LH “window window” <strong>–</strong><br />
�� Absence of LH threshold <strong>–</strong> E2 insufficient for<br />
follicular development and endometrial<br />
proliferation<br />
�� Excess LH <strong>–</strong> cessation of normal foliicular<br />
development, atresia<br />
�� LH supplementation - controversial<br />
Traditional <strong>The</strong>rapy <strong>–</strong> Ovulation<br />
induction<br />
�� clomiphene citrate<br />
�� gonadotropins (urinary +<br />
recombinant)<br />
step-up step up vs step-down step down<br />
�� hMG<br />
�� pulsatile GnRH<br />
(hypothalamic hypogonadotropic amenorrhoea)
30<br />
Traditional therapy <strong>–</strong> Stimulation for<br />
ART<br />
�� GnRH agonist :<br />
- prevention of LH surge and premature<br />
luteinization,<br />
- enhanced folliculogenesis.<br />
- higher oocyte retrieval rate<br />
- long protocol<br />
- microdose flare<br />
- stop<br />
�� GnRH antagonists<br />
- prevent premture LH surge<br />
- more physiological than agonists as<br />
pituitary hormone secretion is suppressed<br />
within a few hours<br />
- shorter stimulation period<br />
- no sex steroid withdrawal symptoms<br />
- less OHSS
31<br />
Traditional therapy for poor<br />
responder<br />
�� GnRH Antatgonist<br />
�� Long GnRH<br />
�� Microdose GnRH<br />
agonist “flare flare”<br />
�� GnRH <strong>–</strong> stop protocol<br />
Defining the “<strong>Poor</strong> <strong>Poor</strong> <strong>Responder</strong>”<br />
<strong>Responder</strong><br />
�� 10-15% 10 15% of women undergoing IVF, related to advanced<br />
maternal age and diminished ovarian reserve<br />
�� Advanced maternal age<br />
�� Premature ovarian failure<br />
�� Decreased ovarian reserve due to:<br />
�� Genetics<br />
�� Surgery<br />
�� Endometriosis<br />
�� Radiation<br />
�� Chemotherapy<br />
�� affects egg production<br />
�� affects oocyte quality<br />
�� Low pregnancy rate irrespective of treatment
32<br />
�� No advantage for letrozole/antagonist protocol<br />
�� Increased follicular fluid androgens may have<br />
negative effect on oocyte quality<br />
Frattarelli, J et al, Fertility sterility 2007<br />
�� Retrospective paired study of 60 women, treated with<br />
traditional protocol and luteal estradiol protocol in<br />
consecutive cycles<br />
�� 44 women traditional first, 16 women luteal estradiol first<br />
�� Same protocol both cycles <strong>–</strong> microdose flare or GnRH<br />
antagonist PLUS estradiol<br />
�� fresh IVF cycles only<br />
�� Pregnancy outcome rates not indicative as no women<br />
became pregnant in first cycle<br />
�� Main outcome measure <strong>–</strong> number of embryos with >7<br />
cells on day 3
33<br />
�� No difference in antral follicle count, days of stimulation,<br />
number of follicles >14mm or endometrial thickness on<br />
day of surge, or number of embryos transferred<br />
�� higher peak estradiol (p
34<br />
AACEP Protocol<br />
�� OCP 3 weeks<br />
�� GnRH agonist, long protocol from day 21,<br />
overlap wt OCP 5-7 5 7 days, stopped at menses<br />
�� GnRH antagonist commenced day 2 of menses<br />
�� Estradiol valerate IM every 3 days for 2 doses<br />
�� Estrogen suppositories to maintain endometrium<br />
until at least one follicle > 15mm<br />
�� Stimulation with FSH, then HMG in step-down step down<br />
�� Ovulation wt hCG, OPU after 34.5 hrs<br />
�� Estrogen “priming priming” - of FSH receptors<br />
- slows premature follicular development<br />
- promotes granulosa cell FSH receptor<br />
induction<br />
�� IM administration to prevent conversion to<br />
estrone
35<br />
PREGNANCY RATE ACCORDING<br />
TO DIAGNOSIS<br />
Elevated FSH<br />
Unexplained<br />
AMA ( > 41)<br />
Severe Endometriosis<br />
Decreased Ovarian Reserve<br />
TOTAL<br />
num<br />
14/40<br />
15/52<br />
5/26<br />
2/12<br />
1/ 7<br />
37 / 137<br />
%<br />
35<br />
29<br />
19<br />
17<br />
14<br />
27 %<br />
�� Younger (