Final Report PlanFirst Review Taskforce - Department of Planning
Final Report PlanFirst Review Taskforce - Department of Planning
Final Report PlanFirst Review Taskforce - Department of Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Hon Craig Knowles MP<br />
Minister for Infrastructure and <strong>Planning</strong><br />
Minister for Natural Resources<br />
Level 33<br />
Governor Macquarie Tower<br />
1 Farrer Place<br />
SYDNEY NSW 2000<br />
Dear Minister<br />
<strong>PlanFirst</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Taskforce</strong><br />
28 July 2003<br />
As you are aware from 1 November 2002, NSW consent authorities began collecting an additional<br />
'<strong>PlanFirst</strong>' fee on all development applications valued at over $50,000.<br />
Revenue from the fee was to be used to part fund the development <strong>of</strong> regional strategies and to<br />
provide funding assistance to local councils to improve strategic planning and delivery <strong>of</strong> new local<br />
plans. Allocation <strong>of</strong> a certain proportion <strong>of</strong> the fee revenue to local government was seen as critical<br />
in implementing the 'new' system at the local level. The intention was that the State government<br />
would also provide funding, for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the reforms, equivalent to that collected<br />
through the fee.<br />
Term <strong>of</strong> Reference No. 3 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PlanFirst</strong> <strong>Taskforce</strong> is to:<br />
'Advise on how the strategic planning fee currently being collected on certain development<br />
applications should be used to progress reform <strong>of</strong> the planning system'.<br />
At its last meeting, the <strong>Taskforce</strong> examined the current state <strong>of</strong> play in relation to collection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fee and considered possible options for the ongoing collection and use <strong>of</strong> the fee.<br />
The <strong>Taskforce</strong> was <strong>of</strong> the view that the EP&A Act provides for State and regional planning as a<br />
legitimate and core function <strong>of</strong> the State Government and that a stand alone, additional fee on<br />
development is not necessarily the most equitable way to fund this fundamental and central role <strong>of</strong><br />
government. Accordingly, funding for these core functions is more appropriately sourced from<br />
Treasury during the annual budget process.<br />
However, the <strong>Taskforce</strong> considered that the fee should be retained in the short term and at least<br />
until the end <strong>of</strong> the 2003/04 financial year. The abolition or retention <strong>of</strong> the fee in a different form<br />
PRINT VERSION<br />
1 September 2003<br />
42