21.01.2013 Views

chapter 4: temperature inside the landfill

chapter 4: temperature inside the landfill

chapter 4: temperature inside the landfill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and<br />

_ _<br />

t − − ><br />

T + Y T t Y<br />

<strong>the</strong>n a significant <strong>temperature</strong> drop event has occurred.<br />

_<br />

X<br />

(4-4)<br />

Where T t−Y<br />

is <strong>the</strong> mean of <strong>the</strong> <strong>temperature</strong> readings over Y days before time t, T t+<br />

Y is <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>temperature</strong> averaged over Y days after time t and X is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> two averages.<br />

The values of X and Y are dependent on <strong>the</strong> sensor location (injection well or monitoring<br />

location). The sensitivity of <strong>the</strong> results with respect to Y was tested by using different values of<br />

Y varying from 4 to 20 days. The number of events did not vary with <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> value of<br />

Y. A value of 20 days for injection wells and 15 days for monitoring locations gave <strong>the</strong> most<br />

reasonable detection of injection events.<br />

The value of X affected <strong>the</strong> number of identified events significantly. The various values<br />

of X tested were 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 0 C for <strong>the</strong> monitoring locations and 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 0 C for<br />

injection wells. Because of <strong>temperature</strong> sensor sensitivity, <strong>the</strong> use of a small number for X<br />

overestimated <strong>the</strong> number of detected injection events while a large number underestimated it.<br />

After numerous trials, 0.5 0 C gave <strong>the</strong> most reasonable detection of injection events for <strong>the</strong><br />

injection wells as confirmed by <strong>the</strong> injection records. A value of 0.2 0 C for X at <strong>the</strong> monitoring<br />

locations was used to minimize <strong>the</strong> excessive number of false readings.<br />

When moisture arrives, <strong>the</strong> resistance reading of <strong>the</strong> moisture sensor falls. Therefore to<br />

detect moisture arrival using moisture sensors, <strong>the</strong> difference in <strong>the</strong> natural log values of <strong>the</strong><br />

mean of resistance values Y days before and after <strong>the</strong> event was <strong>the</strong> criterion as log of <strong>the</strong><br />

46<br />

_

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!