22.01.2013 Views

SSA Annual Review 09/10 - Singapore Shipping Association

SSA Annual Review 09/10 - Singapore Shipping Association

SSA Annual Review 09/10 - Singapore Shipping Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SSA</strong> ANNUAL REVIEW 20<strong>09</strong>/20<strong>10</strong><br />

36<br />

ACTIVITIES REPORT<br />

Limitation of Liability – Maritime Claims<br />

In March 20<strong>09</strong>, off the south-east coast of<br />

Queensland, Australia, the Pacific Adventurer lost<br />

31 containers of ammonium nitrate, resulting<br />

in the holing of the vessel and the loss of 270<br />

tonnes of bunker fuel. While the carrier relied<br />

on its right to limit liability under the 1996 LLMC<br />

Convention, the Australian government insisted<br />

that the carrier meet all established claims in full.<br />

In addition to threatening to impose bans on the<br />

company’s shipping and other interests, Australia<br />

was considering to impose a levy on all ships calling<br />

at Australian ports to recoup the shortfall between<br />

the shipowner’s limitation amount and the eventual<br />

total amount of all established claiMs<br />

Australia has subsequently submitted a paper to<br />

the IMO Legal Committee calling for increases to<br />

the 1996 LLMC Convention amounts and also “an<br />

assessment of whether the current provisions under<br />

LLMC remain relevant and, if considered advisable,<br />

recommending possible amendments.” This paper<br />

will be yet another proposal to have the 1996<br />

LLMC Convention limits increased.<br />

The Committee agreed that <strong>SSA</strong> would neither<br />

support any government’s initiatives to raise the<br />

limits of shipowner’s liability nor the enactment of<br />

any unilateral legislation aimed at raising limits of<br />

liability for ship owners.<br />

It was further noted that there would be no<br />

advantage for owners to move from the LLMC<br />

’76 Convention to the LLMC ’96, as there was no<br />

increase in defences to match the increase in limits.<br />

People’s Republic of China (PRC)<br />

Marine Pollution Regulations<br />

The Committee viewed the PRC regulations on<br />

the prevention and control of marine pollution<br />

from ships (State Council Decree (No.561)) which<br />

entered into force in China on 1 March 20<strong>10</strong> with<br />

concern as it bears resemblance to the US Oil<br />

Pollution Act 1990.<br />

The PRC regulations are aimed at the prevention<br />

and control of marine pollution from ships<br />

(including port operations, ship-breaking and waste<br />

disposal) and will be administered by the PRC<br />

Ministry of Transport.<br />

In spite of the implementation of the regulations,<br />

the Committee was concerned that there remained<br />

no clear guidance from the Chinese authorities with<br />

regard to a number of technical and operational<br />

requirements.<br />

The Legal & Insurance Committee, working<br />

together with the other <strong>SSA</strong> Operational<br />

Committees, has continued to seek clarification on<br />

the actual implementation guidelines on the PRC<br />

regulations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!