47. Volume 14- Number 2 - IP Australia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2001 VOL 14 NO. 2 continuous. (Data in parenthesis based on local observation, all RHS colour chart numbers used in local observation is from 1986 edition). Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent RT 93 60 x pollen parent RT 94 52 in a planned breeding program. The main difference to the parents is petal colour, which shows more green colour in the candidate. Selection criteria: flower size, green colour. Propagation: vegetative over several generations. Breeder: Hans Jurgen Evers, Uetersen, Germany. Choice of Comparators The qualified person considers that ‘Ruikuik’ A syn Cream Prophyta A as the closest variety. However, the colour of marginal zone of inner side of the petal in the comparator is RHS 4 C-D as opposed to RHS 150B-D in the candidate. Comparative Trial The detailed description published herein is based on EU Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) Report ROO 2660 dated 22 Jan 2001 and local observations made in Catherine Field NSW in Mar 2001. The data from local observations is shown in parenthesis. Prior Application and Sales Country Year Current Status Name Applied EU 1999 Applied ‘Tanedaj’ Poland 1999 Applied ‘Tanedaj’ Canada 2000 Applied ‘Tanedaj’ Israel 2000 Applied ‘Tanedaj’ Norway 2000 Applied ‘Tanedaj’ First sold in Germany in Mar 1999. Australian sales Nil. Description: Mike Barrett and Associates, Beecroft, NSW. ‘Tanaran’ Application No: 2000/293 Accepted: 20 Nov 2000. Applicant: Rosen Tantau, Mathias Tantau Nachfolger, Uetersen, Germany. Agent: Sovereign Nurseries Pty Ltd, Catherine Field, NSW. Characteristics (Figure 2) Plant: narrow bushy, height low to medium, width medium. Young shoot: anthocyanin colouration strong, bronze to reddish brown, (purple). Stem: prickles present, shape of lower side deep concave, short prickles many, long prickles number many (medium). Leaf: length medium, width narrow, medium green, glossiness weak, leaflet; cross section flat (slight concave), undulation of margin weak (absent or very weak), terminal leaflet; length of blade medium (mean 68.6mm), width medium (mean 41.6mm), (petiole length 14.3mm), shape of base obtuse (rounded). Flowering shoot: number of shoots very few (few). Flower pedicel: number of hairs or prickles medium; flower bud: shape of longitudinal section ovate; type: double; number of petals few to medium (medium); diameter medium (medium to large); view from above star-shaped; upper profile flattened convex; lower profile concave; fragrance: weak; sepal: extensions strong to very strong (strong);petal: size length medium, width broad (mean 46.6mm); colour of middle zone of inner side yellow-orange ca. RHS 25A (ca. RHS 30B); colour of marginal zone orange-red, outer petals slightly more pink ca. RHS 30B (ca. RHS 30A); spot at base of inner side 58 present; size medium to large; colour ca. RHS 13A (ca. RHS 12A); colour of middle zone of outer side ca. RHS 23C – light yellow-orange, ca. RHS 23C but slightly more orange, (ca. RHS 29B); colour of marginal zone ca. RHS 32B (ca. RHS 41A); spot at base of outer side present, size medium to large; colour ca. RHS 12B – yellow as a flush, (ca. RHS 12C); reflexing of margin strong; undulation of margin weak; outer stamen predominant colour of filament orange; seed vessel: size at petal fall medium; hip: shape of longitudinal size pitcher- shaped; predominant colour of style pink; almost continuous flowering. (Data in parenthesis based on local observation, all RHS colour chart numbers used in local observation is from 1986 edition). Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent RT 88234 x pollen parent ‘Tanitef’ in a planned breeding program. Both parents are breeding stock plants within the breeding program. The main difference to the parents is larger flower diameter. Selection criteria: flower colour, fragrance. Propagation: vegetative over several generations. Breeder: Hans Jurgen Evers, Uetersen, Germany. Choice of Comparators The qualified person considers that ‘Sunlampo’ syn Bellisima and ‘Tennessee’ A are the most similar varieties of common knowledge on the basis of flower colour. However, the main differences are that both varieties have medium size basal spots and the colours are different (RHS 14A and RHS 7A respectively). ‘Fryxotic’ was initially considered as a suitable comparator but later discarded on account of its small basal spots and uniformity of colouration of the inner side of petals. Comparative Trial The detailed description published herein is based on EU Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) Report ROO 2640 dated 21 Jan 2001 and local observations made in Catherine Field, NSW in Mar 2001. The data from local observations is given in parenthesis. Prior Application and Sales Country Year Current Status Name Applied Canada 1998 Applied ‘Tanaran’ EU 1998 Applied ‘Tanaran’ Poland 1998 Applied ‘Tanaran’ Israel 1999 Applied ‘Tanaran’ First sold in Germany in Jan 1998. First sales in Australia Jun 2000. Description: Mike Barrett and Associates, Beecroft, NSW. ‘Climbing Kardinal’ Application No: 1998/216 Accepted: 22 Oct 1998. Applicant: Knight’s Roses, Gawler, SA. Characteristics (Table 31, Figure 6) Plant: growth habit climbing, height tall, width broad. Stem: anthocyanin very weak, prickles present, prickle shape of lower side concave. Leaf: size medium, glossiness of upper side weak, leaflet cross-section slight concave, undulation of margin weak. Terminal leaflet: length medium (av. 42mm), width medium (av. 29mm), shape of base rounded. Flowering shoot: number of flowers few. Flower pedicel: several hard prickles. Flower bud: shape of longitudinal section broad
ovate. Flower: type double, diameter medium (av. 88 mm), view from above irregularly rounded, profile of upper part flattened convex, profile of lower part flat, fragrance weak, sepal extension weak. Petal: size medium, number of petals many, colour of middle zone of inner side red (RHS 52A), marginal zone of inner side red (RHS 52A), basal spot of inner side present, spot size small, spot colour yellow (RHS 2A); petal colour of middle zone of outer side red (RHS 53D), marginal zone of outer side red (RHS 53D); basal spot of outer side present, size very small, spot colour yellow (RHS 2A); reflexing of margin medium, undulation of margin medium. Outer stamen: predominant colour of filament pink. Seed: vessel size medium, Hip: shape of longitudinal section pitcher shape. Flowering habit: almost continuous flowering. (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1986 edition.) Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: ‘Climbing Kardinal’ arose as a natural mutation from ‘Kardinal’. The parental variety is a bush rose and a climbing shoot was observed in one of the bushes of ‘Kardinal’ in breeder’s nursery during 1995. Ten buds were isolated from the sport and grafted onto non-virus indexed Dr. Huey rootstock. All resultant plants exhibited climbing growth habit. In the following year, 100 more grafts were made and all plants were found to be uniform and stable for the climbing characteristic. Selection criteria: climbing growth habit. Propagation: ‘Climbing Kardinal’ will be commercially propagated by budding method. Breeder: Daniel Knight, Knights Roses, Gawler, SA. Choice of Comparators ‘Kardinal’ and ‘Symphony’ were considered for the comparative trial. ‘Kardinal’ was chosen because it is the parental variety of the candidate. ‘Symphony’ was chosen for its similar coloured flowers and climbing growth habit. ‘Climbing Crimson Glory’ was initially considered for the trial but later excluded because of its different red flower colour (RHS 61B – 60C, 1986). Another variety named ‘Cassandre’ was also excluded due to differences in flower colour (RHS 57A-57C, 1986). Comparative Trial Location: Knights Roses, Gawler, SA. Trial was planted in Jul 1998. DUS data was recorded in Mar 2000. Conditions: trial conducted in open field, plants grafted on Dr. Huey rootstock. Trial design: 20 plants of each variety grown at random. Measurements: 20 plants at random. One sample per plant. Prior Applications and Sales Nil. Description: Kim Syrus, Melrose Park, SA. Table 31 Rosa varieties ‘Climbing *‘Kardinal’ *‘Symphony’ Kardinal’ ____________________________________________________ PLANT: GROWTH HABIT climbing bushy climbing ____________________________________________________ PLANT: HEIGHT tall medium tall ____________________________________________________ YOUNG SHOOT: ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION very weak medium weak ____________________________________________________ PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2001 VOL 14 NO. 2 PRICKLES: SHAPE OF LOWER SIDE concave concave deep concave ____________________________________________________ LEAF: GLOSSINESS OF UPPERSIDE weak weak medium ____________________________________________________ LEAFLET: CROSS SECTION slight slight slight concave concave to concave flat ____________________________________________________ FLOWERING PEDICEL PRICKLES several hard few hard medium prickles prickles fine stiff prickles ____________________________________________________ PETAL COLOUR (RHS, 1986) midzone inside 52A 45B ca. 45D margin inside 52A 45B ca. 45D midzone outside 53D 52A ca. 46D margin outside 53D 52A ca. 46D ____________________________________________________ BASAL SPOT COLOUR (RHS, 1986) inside 2A 2A 1D outside 2A 2A 1D ____________________________________________________ OUTER STAMEN: PREDOMINANT COLOUR OF FILAMENT pink pink pink to red ____________________________________________________ ‘Hansug’ syn Sugar Plum Fairy Application No.1996/123 Accepted: 1 Jul 1996. Applicant: Falk Hannemann, Box Hill North, VIC. Characteristics (Table 32, Figure 3) Plant: growth habit spreading, low compact, bushy, ground cover, Young shoots: green, anthocyanin absent. Stem thorns: upper surface convex, lower surface deep concave, usually three thorns between internodes. Leaves: size small, medium green, upper side low gloss. Terminal Leaflet: cross-section slightly concave, margin undulation absent, leaf base obtuse. Flower bud: profile ovate. Flower pedicel: prickles absent. Flower: size small, semi-single, upper and lower profile flat, fragrance strong spicy, sepal extension weak, stamen filament colour yellow to bronze, style green to purple, stigma above anthers. Petals: size small, colour midzone inner side RHS 74A, margin inner side RHS 74A, mid-zone outer side RHS 74C, margin outer side RHS 74C, basal spot small, colour inside and outside RHS 160B. Seed Vessel: small pitcher shaped. Flowering habit: large clusters of up to 300 flowers, remontant. (Note: all RHS chart numbers refer to the 1986 edition.) Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent ‘Violette’ seedling x pollen parent ‘Violette’ seedling in a planned breeding program. Both parents are remontant breeding stock plants in breeder’s private collection. Selection criteria: compact growth, ground cover habit, unusual purple flower colour, continuous flowering, strong spicy fragrance, vigorous development on own roots and high disease resistance. Propagation: vegetatively through many generations. Breeder: Falk Hannemann, Box Hill North, Victoria. 59 DESCRIPTIONS
Page 1 and 2:
‘Kortraupfi’ - 2001 Release Hyb
Page 3 and 4:
Plant Varieties Journal Part 1 - Ge
Page 5 and 6:
Cumulative Index to Plant Varieties
Page 7 and 8:
all varieties where there is no pos
Page 9 and 10:
Overseas Testing/Data The PBR Act a
Page 11 and 12:
Botanical Variety Page Name Name Nu
Page 13 and 14:
Botanical Variety Page Name Name Nu
Page 15 and 16:
‘Gallery Salvador’ syn Salvador
Page 17 and 18:
‘Princess Rosey’ Application No
Page 19 and 20: decussate, inflorescence racemose.
Page 21 and 22: Origin and Breeding Controlled poll
Page 23 and 24: PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2001 VOL 14
Page 25 and 26: entire, margin undulation absent, a
Page 27 and 28: Table 3 Calibrachoa varieties PLANT
Page 29 and 30: Comparative Trial Location: Macquar
Page 33 and 34: Origin and Breeding Controlled self
Page 35 and 36: Fig 1 Rose - flowers and plant part
Page 37 and 38: Fig 10 Calibrachoa - flowers of (to
Page 39 and 40: Fig 22 Brachyscome - ‘Mauve Mysti
Page 41 and 42: Fig 33 Prunus Rootstock - ‘Avimag
Page 45 and 46: From Page 32 by button type flowers
Page 47 and 48: Prior Applications and Sales Countr
Page 49 and 50: LINT % mean 40.7 39.6 std deviation
Page 51 and 52: conventional management. Trial desi
Page 55 and 56: ‘Balfieorce’ syn Fiesta Orange
Page 57 and 58: Table 22 Lolium varieties PLANT VAR
Page 59 and 60: Origin and Breeding Controlled poll
Page 61 and 62: STOLON BRANCHING present absent or
Page 63 and 64: tolerant to water logging, tolerant
Page 65 and 66: later. The candidate variety is sim
Page 67 and 68: ‘Arctic Pride’ Application No:1
Page 69: Choice of Comparators ‘Korlingo
Page 73 and 74: tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is v
Page 75 and 76: ‘Q195’ Application No: 2000/181
Page 77 and 78: Origin and Breeding Seedling select
Page 79 and 80: 10/06/99. The field trial was plant
Page 81 and 82: AWNS OR SCURS present absent presen
Page 83 and 84: ‘Morena’ Application No: 2000/2
Page 87 and 88: INTERNODE LENGTH (mm) mean 24.6 15.
Page 89 and 90: ‘Yael’ A Application No: 1997/2
Page 91 and 92: ‘Diamond Bright’ A syn Crimson
Page 93 and 94: Cantharellus cibarius Mushroom ‘C
Page 95 and 96: APPENDIX 1 FEES Two fee structures
Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX 2 Plant Breeders Rights Ad
Page 99 and 100: Fungi, Entomopathogenic Milner, Ric
Page 101 and 102: TABLE 2 NAME TELEPHONE AREA OF OPER
Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX 4 INDEX OF ACCREDITED NON-
Page 105 and 106: Phone: (372 4) 334 650 Fax: (372 4)
Page 107 and 108: CURRENT STATUS OF PLANT VARIETY PRO
Page 109 and 110: Authorised Centralised Test Centres
Page 111 and 112: APPENDIX 7 LIST OF CLASSES FOR VARI
Page 113 and 114: Lily Lilium hybrid Mango Mangifera
Page 115 and 116: ADVERTISE YOUR NEW VARIETY OR SERVI
show all

47. Volume 14- Number 2 - IP Australia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?