overview and results of the working groups - UNICEF Joint ...

JMP process on global post-2015 monitoring 

IDENTIFYING TARGETS & INDICATORS 

FOR POST-2015 MONITORING, IN THE 

CONTEXT OF A PLAUSIBLE GLOBAL GOAL 

Guy Hutton 

Consultant to the 

WHO/UNICEF 

Joint Monitoring Programme 

Stockholm World Water Week – 2012

Purposes of Global Monitoring 

• Global advocacy 

• Measuring progress for the global community 

• Informing global investments 

• Supporting regional and country 

benchmarking and reporting 

• Informing investments at country level by 

governments and donors 

Focus on national governments as the client 

Stockholm World Water Week – 2012 

2 

2

Current MDG target and indicator 

• Target: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable 

access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation 

• Indicator: Proportion of population using an improved drinking water 

source 

Strengths 

Simple. Strong message/tool 

Realistic/achievable 

Focuses on ends rather than means 

(flexible to context) 

Successfully raised profile of water and 

sanitation issues and focused attention on 

scale of problem globally and at national 

level 

Weaknesses 

Lacks ambition - focuses only on 

basic/minimum level of service 

Average figures mask disparities within 

population – focus on easy to reach 

Definition of ‘improved facility’ 

inadequate proxy for ‘services’ 

Incentivizes new services over existing 

Defined for global not national level 


3 

3

Aims of the Post-2015 Process 

• Through broad consultation with experts and 

stakeholders, to propose a menu of improved global 

WASH targets with corresponding indicators, 

incorporating human rights principles, to set the 

direction of the WASH sector development after 2015 

• Select from these the most “bankable” ones congruent 

with a possible Sustainable Development Goal on 

WASH 

• Identify the means by which these targets and 

indicators will be measured (measurability and global 

monitoring architecture) 


4 

4

Funneling Process for Targets and Indicators 

Universe of 

targets and 

indicators 


Targets and 

indicators of 

global relevance 


indicators 

proposed for 

global monitoring 


indicators for 

SDG framework 

5 

5

JANUARY 2012 

JULY 2012 

DECEMBER 2012 

Overview of Process 

LONG 

LISTING 

SHORT 

LISTING 

Identify through expert 

and stakeholder 

consultation the range 

of global WASH targets 

and indicators 

Assess which are most 

technically and 

politically feasible for 

global monitoring and 

for the SDG 


6 

6

Summary of Process Until July 2012 

Long List of Global Goals, Targets and Indicators 

TIME 

LONG LIST 

Berlin 

Consultation 

Identification of Chairs/ 

Experts & Initiation of 

4 Working Groups 

Meetings of Working Groups 

and Initial Outreach 

Communication at global and regional 

water events and to UN system 

WASH goals and “long list” of target and indicator 

options from working groups 


7 

7

Summary of Process From July 2012 

Refining Global Goal, Targets and Indicators 

WASH SECTOR BROADER 

August 

September 

October 

JMP / WG Consultation Document “1” – 

compiled, unconsolidated 

Further JMP Urban 

Online 

public & WG Taskforce 

“1” 

meetings Work (UNC) 

JMP / WG Consultation Document “2” 

- consolidated, full indicator listing 

C 

o 

m 

m 

u 

n 

i 

c 

a 

C 

o 

n 

s 

u 

l 

t 

a 

C 

o 

o 

r 

d 

i 

n 

a 

SG’s High 

Level Panel 

Intergovernmental 

working group 

Thematic 

consultations 

November 

Online 

“2” 

and 

e-survey 

Regional and country 

consultations / sharing 

Measurability meeting 

t 

i 

o 

n 

t 

i 

o 

n 

t 

i 

o 

n 

Initiation of 

process in 

other linked 

sectors 

Country 

Documentation for The Hague meeting 

consultations 


8 

8

December 

2012 

January 

2013 

February 

March 

April 

May-June 

September 

Summary of Process From December 2012 

Refining Global Goal, Targets and Indicators 

Online 

“3” 

Indicator 

validation 

WASH SECTOR BROADER 

The Hague meeting 

Meeting report with proposals 

Regional & country 

consultations 

Global monitoring 

architecture 

IRC Symposium 

Consolidation – core group 

C 

o 

m 

m 

u 

n 

i 

c 

a 

t 

i 

o 

n 

C 

o 

n 

s 

u 

l 

t 

a 

t 

i 

o 

n 

Proposals to UNGA 

C 

o 

o 

r 

d 

i 

n 

a 

t 

i 

o 

n 

Water Thematic 

consultation? 

& coordination with 

other thematic areas 

Country 

consultations 


Report of HLP 

Report of 

Intergovernmental 

working group 

9 

9

Thank you for listening 

WHO / UNICEF 


www.wssinfo.org 

World Health Organization 

Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Health 

www.who.int/water_sanitation_health 

UNICEF 

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 

www.unicef.int 

Stockholm World Water Week – 2012

JMP Post-2015 Process on Global Monitoring 

Sanitation 

Working Group 

Eddy Perez, Working Group Coordinator 

Water and Sanita7on Program

Activities of the 

Sanitation Working Group 

January 2012 

Constitution of Sanitation Working Group 

February 2012: 

Preparation of Background Paper 

Face-to-face meeting of core group, Washington DC 

May 2012: 

Webinar for wider group, including reference group 

June 2012: 

Audio conference of core group 

Planned for September 2012: 

Face-to-face meeting of core group, London 

2

Through this process the group: 

• Defined a proposed overall goal 

• Develop a long list of targets and then shortened it to a 

list of four 

• Developed lists of indictors that could be used for each 

target 

• Began development of defini8ons of the terms used in 

the targets 

• Iden8fied possible sources of data 

• Developed a list of other parameters, not included in the 

targets, that we felt it was important to monitor 

3

Proposed Overall Sanitation 

Goal 

Universal use of sustainable 

sanitation services that protect public 

health and dignity 

4

Proposed Targets 

1. By 2030, no-one practices open defecation 

2. By 2030, 80% of the poorest quintile, and 80% of the 

entire population uses an adequate sanitation facility 

3. By 2030, the excreta of 50% of households is safely 

stored, transported, and adequately treated, before 

being either re-used or safely returned to the 

environment 

4. By 2030, all schools and health facilities offer 

adequate sanitation facilities to all users 

5

Target 1: By 2025, no-one practices open 

defecation 

Proposed Indicators 

1. Percentage of households in the lowest wealth quin8le 

prac8cing OD 

2. Percentage of total, urban and rural households prac8cing OD 

3. Percentage of households with children under 5 repor8ng 

hygienic disposal of their stools 

4. Percentage of households in which OD is prac8ced by any 

members of household (men, women, children over 5) 

6

Target 2: By 2030, 80% of poorest quintile, and 80% 

of the entire population uses an adequate sanitation 

facility 


1. Percentage of households using adequate sanita8on facility 

(disaggregated urban and rural and by wealth quin8les) 

2. Percentage of households in which the sanita8on facility is used 

by all members of household (including men and women, boys 

and girls, elderly, people with disabili8es) whenever needed 

3. Percentage of total popula8on using an adequate sanita8on 

facility 

7

Definition: ‘Adequate’ sanitation 

• Separates excreta from human contact and ensures that 

excreta does not re-enter the immediate household 

environment 

• Safe (protects the user from risks such as vermin, falling 

into the pit) 

• Durable 

• Household or shared toilet within or nearby the plot, shared 

by no more than 5 families or 30 people, whichever is 

fewer, and used by people who know each other 

• Accessible at all times (7 days a week, 24 hours a day) 

• Accessible to all members of household, including those 

with disabilities 

• Protects users from culturally-inappropriate exposure or 

invasion of privacy 

8

Target 3: By 2030, the excreta of 50% of households 

is safely stored and transported, and adequately 

treated before being re-used or discharged to the 

environment 


1. Percentage of the total popula8on served by a 

func8oning sanita8on service chain, disaggregated by 

urban and rural, and by wealth quin8les 

2. Quan8ty of fecal maIer in the environment 

9

Target 4: By 2025, all schools and health facilities 

offer adequate sanitation facilities to all users 


1. Percentage of schools with separate and adequate facili8es, used by all, for 

boys and girls 

2. Percentage of health facili8es with separate and adequate facili8es, used by 

all, for men and women 

10

Definition: ‘Separate and adequate’ sanitation in 

schools and health facilities 

• No more than xx users per seat or cubicle in schools 

• Gender specific; separate for girls and boys 

• Includes facilities for menstrual hygiene management 

(disposal for MHM materials) 

• Includes facilities for handwashing with soap and water 

• Accommodates needs of children with disabilities 

11

Other parameters to monitor 

Parameter! Proposed Indicators 

Affordability • Percentage of monthly/yearly income that household spends on 

sanita8on, disaggregated by wealth quin8le 

Community-‐wide sanita8on • Percentage of communi8es that are cer8fied “Open Defeca8on 

Free” 

Public expenditure • Percentage of GDP spent on sanita8on 

• Percentage of aid spent on sanita8on 

• Percentage of countries that have a separate na8onal budget 

line for sanita8on 

Discrimina8on and Exclusion • Coverage of adequate facili8es within “non-‐dominant” groups 

(defined by mother tongue, race, caste, occupa8on) 

Progress against the old 

“improved” defini8on 

• Percent of popula8on using “improved” sanita8on as per 

pre-‐2015 defini8on 

12

Acknowledgements: 

WG Members – Core Group 

1. Eddy Perez, Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank (WG lead) 

2. Clarissa Brocklehurst, Consultant 

3. Sandy Cairncross, LSHTM/SHARE Consortium, UK 

4. Cassilda Carvalho, Association of Sanitary and Environmental 

Engineering, Brazil 

5. Andy Cotton, WEDC, Loughborough University, UK 

6. Jena Davis, Stanford University, USA 

7. Therese Dooley, UNICEF 

8. Guy Hutton, Joint Monitoring Programme 

9. Pete Kolsky, Water Institute, University of North Carolina, USA 

10. Alex McPhail, World Bank 

11. Virginia Roaf, Team of UN Special Rapporteur on Human Right to Water & 

Sanitation 

12. Yaw Asante Sarkodie, Ministry of Water Resources, Works & Housing, 

Ghana 

13. Darren Saywell, Plan International 

14. Chris Zurbruegg, EAWAG, Switzerland 

15. Alix Zwane, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 

13

Acknowledgements: 

WG Members– Reference Group 

1. Maria Julia Bocco, Inter-American Development Bank 

2. Ned Breslin, Water For People 

3. Bertha Briceno, Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank 

4. Alexander Danilenko, IBNET, Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank 

5. Barbara Evans, University of Leeds, UK 

6. Soma Ghosh, World Bank 

7. Rifat Hossain, JMP, World Health Organization 

8. Anupma Jain, Asian Development Bank 

9. Rolf Luyendijk, JMP, UNICEF 

10. Meera Mehta, CEPT University, India 

11. Eric Mintz, Centers for Disease Control, USA 

12. Elisabeth von Müench, GIZ/SUSANA, Germany 

13. Ada Oko-Williams, WaterAid Africa 

14. Archana Patkar, Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council 

15. Antonio Rodriguez Serrano, Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank 

16. Gary White, Water.Org 

17. Joep Verhagen, IRC 

18. Dominick de Waal, Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank 

14

JMP post-2015 process on global monitoring 

HYGIENE 

WORKING GROUP 

Merri Weinger 

USAID 

United States of America 

World Singapore Water International Week in Water Stockholm Week – 4 2012 July 2012

Areas of Focus 

Handwashing 

Food Hygiene 

Menstrual Hygiene 

Management 

World Singapore Water International Week in Water Stockholm Week – 4 2012 July 2012 

2

Overall Hygiene Goal 

“Hygiene (handwashing, food hygiene, menstrual 

hygiene management) will be universally recognized, 

promoted, and practiced as fundamental to good 

health, dignity and quality of life” 


3

Targets and Indicators: Selection Criteria 

• Evidence of association with health and non-health benefits 

(social and economic) 

• Global relevance 

• Measurability (including feasibility, cost of data collection, 

and potential for low/no bias) 

• Achievability 

• Potential to address/correct discriminatory practices 


4

Targets 

Handwashing 

1: Ensure universal access to handwashing facilities 

2: To halve the proportion of critical times when hands are not washed with soap 

3: Every government will have policies and programs in place to promote the 

practice of handwashing with soap 

Food Hygiene 

1: By Year XX, each country prioritizes food hygiene in policies and strategy 

2. By Year XX, improved food hygiene behavior practiced by a significant 

proportion of the population involved in food preparation and handling 

Menstrual Hygiene Management 

1: By 2040 all women and adolescent girls are able to manage menstruation 

hygienically and with dignity 


5

Handwashing Target: Ensure universal access 

to handwashing facilities 


1. % of households with soap and water present at the 

designated handwashing facility 

2. % of schools with adequate access to handwashing 

facilities with soap and water 

3. % of health care institutions with fully equipped 

handwashing facilities 

4. % of birthing locations with fully equipped handwashing 

stations 


6

Food Hygiene Target 1: By Year XX, each country 

prioritizes food hygiene in policies and strategy 

Proposed Indicator 

% of lower and middle income countries enforcing 

international food safety recommendations in any of their 

child meal programs 


7

Food Hygiene Target 2: By Year XX, improved food hygiene 

behavior practiced by a significant proportion of the population 

involved in food preparation and handling 


1. % of households that have running water into the 

dwelling 

2. % of households with soap and water at handwashing 

facility in area where food is prepared 


8

Menstrual Hygiene Management Target: By 2040 all women and 

adolescent girls are able to manage menstruation hygienically and 

with dignity 


1. % of schools and primary health facilities 

distributing/disseminating accurate, contextually 

appropriate, pragmatic menstrual management information 

2. % of teachers and healthcare workers who can answer a 

set of basic questions on MHM 

3. % of public facilities, schools, institutions, transport hubs 

and markets that provide gender separated latrines with 

water and soap and disposal facilities for menstrual 

materials 


9

Group Structure and Membership 

Hand Washing: 

Valerie Curtis, LSHTM 

Jacqueline Devine, WSP 

Sonya Hammons, US State Department 

Guy Hutton, WHO/JMP 

Khairul Islam, WaterAid, Bangladesh 

Pavani Ram, SUNY, Buffalo 

Abdou-Salam Savadogo, WHO 

Merri Weinger, USAID (Chair) 

Food Hygiene: 

Peter Ben Embarek, WHO 

Zulfiqar Bhutta, Aga Khan University (Pakistan) 

John Ehiri, University of Arizona 

Orlando Hernandez, USAID/WASHplus 

Claudio Lanata, Nutrition Research Institute 

(Peru) 

Ousmane Toure, Universite de Bamako (Mali) 

Monica Woldt, USAID/FANTA 

Menstrual Hygiene Management: 

Marni Sommer, Columbia University 

Therese Mahon, WaterAid, South Asia 

Alana Potter, IRC 

Rolf Luyendijk, UNICEF 

Virginia Roaf, UN Human Rights Rapporteur 


10











World Singapore Water International Week in Water Stockholm Week – 4 2012 July 2012

JMP post-2015 process on global monitoring 

Preparing the Next Generation of Goals, Targets and Indicators 

Stockholm World Water Week, 30 th August 

Monitoring Drinking Water: 

overview and proposals 

Tom Slaymaker 

Deputy Head of Policy, WaterAid 

Lead, JMP post2015 Water Working Group 

tomslaymaker@wateraid.org 

Stockholm World Water Week – 30 August 2012

Water Working Group Membership 

• National governments: Mozambique, South Africa, 

Madagascar, Ghana, Uganda, India 

• Donor agencies: Inter-American Development Bank, GIZ, 

WSP 

• NGOs: WaterAid, IRC (leads of the working group) 

• Academia/research: University North Carolina, Eawag, 

ICF (DHS), German Institute for Human Rights, Stamford 

University 

• UN: WHO, UNICEF, UN-Habitat 

• Professional Networks: RWSN, IBNET-WSP 

All documents/minutes available http://watermonitoring2015.org/ 

Stockholm World Water Week – 30 August 2012 

2

Goal content and definition 

• We agree that it should be a simple, inspirational and 

communicable expression of the progressive realisation 

of the HRTWS by everyone: 

• Water for all 

• Drinking-water services for all 

• Sustainable drinking water for all 

• Safe, sustainable water for all 

• Safe, sustainable drinking water for all 

• Equal access to safe and sustainable water for all 

• Water for everyone, forever 


3

Target content and definition 

• Unrealistic to expect politicians to accept a long list of 

targets 

• Aim for small number of targets combining universal 

access to basic services and progressive improvement in 

existing service levels 

• Focus on improving access at home and in extra-hh 

settings with explicit focus on disadvantaged groups 

• Move away from improved/unimproved terminology but 

retain the idea of a basic ‘threshold’ for everyone 

• Use normative criteria of HRTWS and service ladder 

concept as guiding principles 


4

What defines a service (criteria)? 

Criterion GC 15 IE 2010 WWG 

Sufficient quantity 

Continuity of service 

Safe for health 

Aesthetically 

acceptable 

Time/distance required 

to collect 

Suitable for use by all, 

including disabled and 

older people 

Affordable 

Availability Availability Availability 

Quality 

Accessibility 

(physical) 

Accessibility 

(economic) 

Quality/safety 

Acceptability 

Quality 

Accessibility Accessibility 

Affordability Affordability 

Non-discrimination Accessibility (Cross-cutting) (Cross-cutting) 


5

Draft targets x4 

1. By 2030, EVERYBODY has equitable access to a basic 

drinking water service at home. 

2. To halve, by 2030, the proportion of people, including 

disadvantaged groups, without equitable access to a higher 

water service at home. 

3. By 2030, EVERYBODY has equitable access to a basic 

water [sanitation and hygiene] services in their schools and 

health facilities. 

----- 

4. Water [sanitation and hygiene] services are delivered in a 

financially, operationally institutionally, and environmentally 

sustainable manner. 


6

Draft candidate indicators (hh) – in progress 

Basic Improved 

source 

Intermediate/ 

higher 

Availability Quality Accessibility Affordability 

50 lpcd, with 

year-round 

service but 

some (daily or 

weekly) 

interruptions 

Improved 

source 

E coli < 1 

CFU/100 mL 

Collection time 

< 30 minutes 

Collection time 

< 10 minutes 

No threshold 

specified 

WASH 

expenditures 

as proportion 

of household 

income < 5% 


7

Draft candidate indicators (extra-hh) – in progress 

Availability Quality Accessibility 

Basic in schools Capable of delivering 

5lpcpd 

Basic in health 

facilities 

Intermediate/ 

higher in schools 

Intermediate/ 

higher in HF 

+ workplaces 

+ markets 

+ transit facilities 

Capable of delivering 

min WHO standard/ 

facility type 

24/7 reliability 

providing >50lpcpd 

24/7 reliability 

providing >50lpcpd 

Improved source Water point located with 

250m and accessible to 

all users 

Improved source Water point located on 

facility premises and 

accessible to all users 

Water meets WHO 

facility standards 

Water meets WHO 

facility standards 

Water point located on 

premises and accessible 

to all users 

Water point located on 

facility premises and 

accessible to all users 


8

Service threshold definitions – in progress 

• Basic hh service: 

Drinking water collected from an improved source (proxy for 

both availability and quality), within 30 minutes per trip 

(accessibility) 

• Intermediate/higher hh service: 

Drinking water collected from a source that supplies 50 litres 

per capita per day year-round (with daily or weekly 

interruptions in supply), requiring no more than 10 minutes to 

collect. No detectable E. coli in a 100 mL sample. Combined 

expenditures on water, sanitation and hygiene cost no more 

than 5% of disposable household income. 


9

Next steps 

• Developing definitions for basic and intermediate/higher in 

extra-hh settings (schools, health facilities, workplaces, 

others) 

• Developing definitions and indicators for sustainability (linking 

with other emerging goals and targets on sustainability) 

• Consolidating with goal, target and indicator proposals from 

other working groups 


10


Water working group 

Documentation of process 

http://watermonitoring2015.org 










Stockholm World Water Week – 30 August 2012

JMP Post-2015 Process on Global Monitoring 

Recommendations of 

the Equity and 

Non-Discrimination 

Working Group 

Catarina de Albuquerque 

UN Special Rapporteur on the 

Human Right to Safe Drinking 

Water and Sanitation 

World Water Week – 30 August 2012

Outline: Integrating END in Post-2015 

Monitoring 

• Why…? 

– The Inequality Blind-Spot 

– Striking Disparities 

• What…? 

– The Equality Checklist 

– Elements for Goals, Targets, and Indicators 

• How…? 

– Improving and Expanding Measurement and Data 

Sources 

World Water Week – 30 August 2012 

2

Why: The Inequality Blind-Spot 

• MDGs silent on discrimination, inequalities and 

disparities 

• Focus on average attainment 

• At least in theory, targets can be achieved without 

benefitting a single person with a disability, a single 

person belonging to an ethnic minority, or a single 

person living in extreme poverty 

• Achievement of the MDGs becomes unattainable 

without addressing inequalities 

• Need to redefine progress – it must not be called 

progress when significant parts of the population are 

left behind 


3

100% 

90% 

80% 

70% 

60% 

50% 

40% 

30% 

20% 

10% 

0% 

Why: Striking Disparities: Urban-Rural 

1990 2010 

All water 

infrastructure+surface 

water 

All water infrastructure 

Improved water sources 

Safe water sources 

safe water sources that 

is within 30mins of home 

safe water sources at 

home 

100% 

90% 

80% 

70% 

60% 

50% 

40% 

30% 

20% 

10% 

0% 

1990 2010 

Urban Rural 


All water 

infrastructure+surface 

water 

All water infrastructure 

Improved water sources 

Safe water sources 

safe water sources that 

is within 30mins of home 

safe water sources at 

home 

Urban-Rural disparities (2010) 

Improved water: 93% vs. 44%, safe water at home: 45% vs. 0.2% 

4

Why: Striking Disparities: Rich-Poor 

7 

Poorest 

57 

31 

5 

37 

36 

16 

11 

40 

16 

Poor 

34 

10 

0 

48 

32 

20 

32 

31 

24 

Middle 

0 

41 

38 

21 

13 Open defecation 

Unimproved facilities 

Shared improved 

facilities 

Improved facilities 

12 

26 

36 

Rich 

27 

0 

24 

44 

32 


4 

13 

36 

Richest 

Rich-poor gap (rural): 42%pt (2000), 40%pt (2008) 

47 

0 

9 

40 

51 

5

What: Monitoring Non-Discrimination and 

Equality 

• How is progress distributed? Who is excluded? 

• Set incentives to reduce inequalities and focus on the 

most disadvantaged 

• Targets must ensure that the most disadvantaged, 

marginalized and discriminated against are reached 

• Disaggregation needs to go beyond rural / urban 

• Current wealth quintile analysis is very powerful, but not 

sufficient 

• Link to prohibited grounds of discrimination to 

understand who lacks access and why 


6

What: The Equality Checklist 

• Prioritize basic access and focus on progressive 

realization toward safe and sustainable water, sanitation 

and hygiene for all, while reducing inequalities 

• Address spatial inequalities, such as those experienced 

by communities in remote and inaccessible rural areas 

and slum-dwellers in (peri-)urban areas 

• Focus on inequities, shining the light on the poorest of 

the poor 


7

What: The Equality Checklist (Cont’d) 

• Address group-related inequalities that vary across 

countries, such as those based on ethnicity, race, 

nationality, language, religion, and caste 

• Attend to the impacts of individual-related inequalities 

relevant in every country of the globe, such as those 

based on sex/gender, age, disability, and health 

conditions imposing access constraints—as experienced 

both inside and beyond the household, including in 

relation to menstrual hygiene management 


8

What: Elements for Goals, Targets, and 

Indicators 

• Adopt a stand-alone goal on equality in the overall architecture of 

post-2015 development goals 

• Include attention to both universality and elimination of inequalities 

in the WASH goal 

• Include targets and indicators that require the elimination of equality 

gaps by targeting the most disadvantaged groups 

• Include specific language in targets and indicators requiring 

reduction in intra-household inequalities based on sex/gender, age, 

health status, and disability which occurs across the globe and in all 

strata of society. 

• Craft targets aimed at the reduction in individual-related inequalities 

beyond the household 

• Include language in targets or indicators addressing menstrual 

hygiene management to capture the ability of women and girls to 

manage menstruation hygienically, in safety, and with dignity. 


9

How: Improving and Expanding Measurement 

and Data Sources 

• Just a few examples… 

– Tools for measuring inequalities such as gap 

analysis or rate of change metrics 

– Amend household surveys to capture actual use of 

WASH facilities by all household members 

– Add a question concerning menstrual hygiene 

management 

– Make use of data about access beyond the 

household 

– Devise a participatory process to identify the most 

disadvantaged groups at the national level 


10

Acknowlegements 

• A huge thanks to all members of the END Working 

Group: 

--- Elizabeth Barrios, David Bradley, Mac Darrow, Louisa 

Gosling, Nicolas Fasel, Khondkar Rifat Hossain, Guy 

Hutton, Rolf Luyendijk, Meera Mehta, Archana Patkar, 

Virginia Roaf, Shea O. Rutstein, Ignacio Saiz, Grace 

Sanico Steffan, Meg Satterthwaite, Madoka Saji, Marcus 

Stahlhofer, Inga Winkler, Zulma Zosa --- 


11

Thank you for your attention 










World Water Week – 30 August 2012

overview and results of the working groups - UNICEF Joint ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?