24.01.2013 Views

Transplantation Immunology.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

Transplantation Immunology.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

Transplantation Immunology.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 Callaghan and Bradley<br />

kidney transplants from marginal donors has been reported to give similar results<br />

to single kidney transplants from nonmarginal donors (23), and dual transplantation<br />

does not appear to increase the rate of surgical complications (24). This<br />

procedure is rarely undertaken in the United Kingdom, with only one dual transplant<br />

performed in 2002–2003.<br />

Objective methods of assessing donor kidney quality are necessary to enable<br />

rational decision making about organ usage, but none are in widespread use.<br />

Scoring systems using donor variables such as age, history of hypertension,<br />

renal function, kidney biopsy findings, cause of death, and HLA mismatch<br />

may provide a quantitative approach to identifying marginal kidneys (25,26).<br />

Until scoring systems become widespread, careful consideration is required as<br />

to how best to allocate these organs from marginal donors. It is also important<br />

that potential recipients offered kidneys from marginal donors receive careful<br />

counseling to enable informed consent to be given (27).<br />

3.2. Living Donors<br />

The outcome of kidney transplantation from living donors has been shown to<br />

be superior to that of kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors (8). Although<br />

they are usually poor matches for HLA, grafts from living unrelated donors<br />

have 3-yr survival rates equivalent to those from living related organs (28).<br />

Concerns surrounding living donor transplantation center on the potential risks<br />

to the donor and on the possibility of coercion, which may be difficult to detect.<br />

The peri-operative mortality rate for live donor nephrectomy is in the region<br />

of 0.03% (29), and the peri-operative major complication rate is approx 2%.<br />

There is no long-term increase in mortality after kidney donation, but donors<br />

may develop asymptomatic proteinuria and hypertension more often than the<br />

general population (30). In addition to a rigorous health screen, potential<br />

donors must be carefully questioned by the transplant team about their<br />

motives for donation and all attempts must be made to ensure that coercion<br />

does not occur.<br />

Medical evaluation of the prospective donor is extensive and can be divided<br />

into different phases (31). ABO blood grouping and cross-match testing are<br />

performed first to establish that living donor transplantation is feasible. This is<br />

followed by a complete medical assessment, including assessment of renal<br />

function, and radiological definition of the renal vascular anatomy. If both kidneys<br />

have single renal arteries, the left kidney is usually selected for donation<br />

because the longer left renal vein makes the recipient operation marginally<br />

technically easier.<br />

Removal of the donor’s kidney has traditionally been performed through a<br />

15- to 20-cm-long flank incision (open-donor nephrectomy). Postoperative<br />

wound pain, which may be chronic in around 5% of donors, and poor cosmesis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!