24.01.2013 Views

Transplantation Immunology.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

Transplantation Immunology.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

Transplantation Immunology.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Status of Liver <strong>Transplantation</strong> 33<br />

A recent report on HCV-infected liver transplant recipients estimated the<br />

risk of developing recurrent cirrhosis to be as high as 44% at 5 yr posttransplant<br />

(14). Berenguer et al. reported data from the UNOS registry demonstrating that<br />

5-yr graft survival in recipients transplanted for hepatitis C was 56.8%, the<br />

worst of all indications with the exception of malignancy (14). Antiviral agents<br />

(interferon, including pegylated interferons, ribavarin, or combinations) have<br />

a low rate of success because of poor patient tolerance, side effects, or a limited<br />

and/or transient response.<br />

In contrast, significant progress has been achieved in the outcome of hepatitis<br />

B virus (HBV)-infected liver recipients with the use of current HBV antiviral<br />

agents. Han and colleagues reported negative hepatitis B surface antigen<br />

serology in 98.3% of patients after transplantation using intramuscular antihepatitis<br />

B immunoglobulin and lamivudine (15).<br />

5. Tumors<br />

Another major demographic shift is the reduction in the proportion of patients<br />

transplanted for primary liver cancer. This diagnosis is clearly associated with<br />

poor outcome because of recurrent disease. In the European Liver Transplant<br />

Registry (ELTR) data, the 1-, 5-, and 9-yr patient survivals for patients with<br />

cirrhosis (79, 69, and 62%) are significantly better than for patients treated for<br />

primary liver cancer (67, 40, and 26%). With improvements in imaging technology,<br />

as well as the adoption of defined selection policies, the proportion of<br />

livers being transplanted for cancer is falling.<br />

6. Retransplantation<br />

In recent years there has been a significant decrease in the number of retransplants<br />

performed. This reflects improvements in every step of the transplant<br />

process, including choice of donors, preservation fluids, surgical techniques,<br />

and, perhaps most important, postoperative recipient management and immunosuppressive<br />

protocols. This issue was addressed by Clemente et al. (16) in a<br />

large retrospective analysis covering more than a decade. They demonstrated<br />

a shift in the major cause of retransplantation from chronic rejection to primary<br />

graft failure, with 5-yr actuarial survival rates dependent on the cause<br />

of graft failure (45.5% for chronic rejection and 19.4% for primary failure)<br />

(16). Graft loss caused by rejection is now uncommon after liver trans-plantation.<br />

The incidence of chronic rejection in 1048 liver recipients followed for<br />

a mean period of more than 6 yr was only 3% (17). In a randomized trial<br />

comparing cyclosporine with tacrolimus after liver transplantation (the<br />

Tacrolimus vs Microemulsified Ciclosporin [TMC] study), the incidence of<br />

chronic rejection was only 0.3% in the tacrolimus group (18). Another study<br />

concluded that chronic rejection does not occur in the pediatric liver recipi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!