Non-parametric estimation of a time varying GARCH model
Non-parametric estimation of a time varying GARCH model
Non-parametric estimation of a time varying GARCH model
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Assumption 1 (i) here is similar in spirit to the stationarity condition for <strong>GARCH</strong><br />
(1,1) <strong>model</strong> discussed by Nelson (1991). This condition is required for the existence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a well defined unique solution to the tv<strong>GARCH</strong> process. It is also sufficient for the<br />
tv<strong>GARCH</strong> to be a short memory process. The Lipschitz continuity condition for the<br />
parameters in Assumption 1 (ii) is required for the local stationarity <strong>of</strong> the tv<strong>GARCH</strong><br />
process. Similar condition is also assumed by Dahlhaus and Subba Rao (2006) for pa-<br />
rameters <strong>of</strong> the tvARCH process. Notice that we do not make any assumption on the<br />
density function <strong>of</strong> ǫt. Therefore, the methodology introduced in the paper will be useful<br />
for analyzing data with heavy tailed distributions which is a common phenomenon in<br />
financial <strong>time</strong> series.<br />
Before proceeding further, we show in Proposition 2.1 that the tv<strong>GARCH</strong> process<br />
possesses a well defined unique solution. In the Proposition 2.2, we derive the covariance<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> the tv<strong>GARCH</strong> process and show that tv<strong>GARCH</strong> is a short memory process.<br />
Proposition 2.1. Let the Assumption 1 (i) hold. Then the variance process (2) has<br />
a well defined unique solution given by<br />
¯σ 2 t = ω � �<br />
t + n<br />
∞� i� �<br />
α<br />
i=1 j=1<br />
� �<br />
t−j+1<br />
v n<br />
2 t−j + β � ��<br />
t−j+1<br />
ω n<br />
� �<br />
t−i , n<br />
such that |σ 2 t − ¯σ 2 t | → 0 a.s., if σ 2 0 (starting point) is finite with probability one. Also,<br />
inf<br />
u ω(u)/(1 − inf<br />
u β(u)) ≤ ¯σ 2 t < ∞ ∀ t a.s.<br />
Proposition 2.2. Suppose that the Assumption 1 (i) is satisfied for the tv<strong>GARCH</strong><br />
process. Further assume that E|vt| 4 < ∞. Then for a fixed k ≥ 0 and 0 < δ < 1,<br />
Cov(ǫ 2 t,ǫ 2 t+k) = O �<br />
(1 − δ) k�<br />
.<br />
Now we define a stationary <strong>GARCH</strong> (1,1) process, which locally approximates the original<br />
process (2) in the neighborhood <strong>of</strong> a fixed point (see Proposition 2.3). Let �ǫt(u0), u0 ∈<br />
(0, 1] be a process with E(�ǫt(u0)| � Ft−1) = 0 and E(�ǫ 2 t(u0)| � Ft−1) = �σ 2 t (u0) where � Ft−1 =<br />
σ(�ǫt−1, �ǫt−2,...). Then {�ǫt(u0)} is said to follow a stationary <strong>GARCH</strong> process associated<br />
with (2) at <strong>time</strong> point u0 if it satisfies,<br />
�ǫt(u0) = �σt(u0)vt,<br />
�σ 2 t (u0) = ω(u0) + α(u0)�ǫ 2 t−1(u0) + β(u0)�σ 2 t−1(u0).<br />
6<br />
(3)