01.02.2013 Views

Non-parametric estimation of a time varying GARCH model

Non-parametric estimation of a time varying GARCH model

Non-parametric estimation of a time varying GARCH model

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Assumption 1 (i) here is similar in spirit to the stationarity condition for <strong>GARCH</strong><br />

(1,1) <strong>model</strong> discussed by Nelson (1991). This condition is required for the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a well defined unique solution to the tv<strong>GARCH</strong> process. It is also sufficient for the<br />

tv<strong>GARCH</strong> to be a short memory process. The Lipschitz continuity condition for the<br />

parameters in Assumption 1 (ii) is required for the local stationarity <strong>of</strong> the tv<strong>GARCH</strong><br />

process. Similar condition is also assumed by Dahlhaus and Subba Rao (2006) for pa-<br />

rameters <strong>of</strong> the tvARCH process. Notice that we do not make any assumption on the<br />

density function <strong>of</strong> ǫt. Therefore, the methodology introduced in the paper will be useful<br />

for analyzing data with heavy tailed distributions which is a common phenomenon in<br />

financial <strong>time</strong> series.<br />

Before proceeding further, we show in Proposition 2.1 that the tv<strong>GARCH</strong> process<br />

possesses a well defined unique solution. In the Proposition 2.2, we derive the covariance<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the tv<strong>GARCH</strong> process and show that tv<strong>GARCH</strong> is a short memory process.<br />

Proposition 2.1. Let the Assumption 1 (i) hold. Then the variance process (2) has<br />

a well defined unique solution given by<br />

¯σ 2 t = ω � �<br />

t + n<br />

∞� i� �<br />

α<br />

i=1 j=1<br />

� �<br />

t−j+1<br />

v n<br />

2 t−j + β � ��<br />

t−j+1<br />

ω n<br />

� �<br />

t−i , n<br />

such that |σ 2 t − ¯σ 2 t | → 0 a.s., if σ 2 0 (starting point) is finite with probability one. Also,<br />

inf<br />

u ω(u)/(1 − inf<br />

u β(u)) ≤ ¯σ 2 t < ∞ ∀ t a.s.<br />

Proposition 2.2. Suppose that the Assumption 1 (i) is satisfied for the tv<strong>GARCH</strong><br />

process. Further assume that E|vt| 4 < ∞. Then for a fixed k ≥ 0 and 0 < δ < 1,<br />

Cov(ǫ 2 t,ǫ 2 t+k) = O �<br />

(1 − δ) k�<br />

.<br />

Now we define a stationary <strong>GARCH</strong> (1,1) process, which locally approximates the original<br />

process (2) in the neighborhood <strong>of</strong> a fixed point (see Proposition 2.3). Let �ǫt(u0), u0 ∈<br />

(0, 1] be a process with E(�ǫt(u0)| � Ft−1) = 0 and E(�ǫ 2 t(u0)| � Ft−1) = �σ 2 t (u0) where � Ft−1 =<br />

σ(�ǫt−1, �ǫt−2,...). Then {�ǫt(u0)} is said to follow a stationary <strong>GARCH</strong> process associated<br />

with (2) at <strong>time</strong> point u0 if it satisfies,<br />

�ǫt(u0) = �σt(u0)vt,<br />

�σ 2 t (u0) = ω(u0) + α(u0)�ǫ 2 t−1(u0) + β(u0)�σ 2 t−1(u0).<br />

6<br />

(3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!