02.02.2013 Views

OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND - The Journal Online

OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND - The Journal Online

OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND - The Journal Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Journal</strong><br />

New Rules<br />

More preparation for<br />

Third party procedure<br />

Under the new rules a form of third<br />

party procedure is made<br />

competent in summary causes. <strong>The</strong><br />

rules governing this are modelled<br />

on those in the Ordinary Cause<br />

Rules. However, an application for<br />

service of a third party notice<br />

normally requires to be made at the<br />

time when the defender lodges a<br />

form of response. It can be made<br />

later only with leave of the sheriff<br />

on cause shown.This is understood<br />

to be with a view to focusing all of<br />

the issues in the case at the initial<br />

hearing.<br />

Decree by default<br />

Much frustration has been caused<br />

by the provision of the present rule<br />

28 which requires the fixing of a<br />

peremptory diet if a party is in<br />

default. <strong>The</strong> new rules are more<br />

robust. <strong>The</strong> sheriff may now grant<br />

decree by default if a party fails to<br />

appear at a hearing (other than the<br />

hearing of an incidental application)<br />

where required to do so. He is not<br />

obliged to grant decree but has a<br />

discretion in the matter. In the case<br />

of a failure to implement an order<br />

of the court after a proof has been<br />

fixed, the sheriff has again a<br />

discretion whether or not to grant<br />

decree by default, but in this case he<br />

must give the offending party an<br />

opportunity to be heard.<br />

Proof<br />

<strong>The</strong> provisions in the new rules for<br />

proof are relatively little changed<br />

from those in the present rules.<br />

Perhaps the most significant<br />

practitioners and sheriffs<br />

Concluding his guide to the news summary cause rules, Sheriff Alastair Stewart<br />

looks at actions of damages for personal injury and small claims<br />

innovation is that the sheriff is given<br />

power, either of his own accord or<br />

on the motion of a party, to order<br />

that proof on liability or some other<br />

specified issue should be heard<br />

separately from proof on any other<br />

issue.This is likely to be of particular<br />

importance in actions of damages<br />

for personal injury.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new rules also contain<br />

provisions for an exchange of lists of<br />

witnesses similar to those in the<br />

Ordinary Cause Rules.<br />

Regarding productions there is a<br />

new rule providing that a party<br />

Party lodging<br />

productions must<br />

send a list thereof to<br />

every other party<br />

lodging productions must send a list<br />

thereof to every other party and<br />

must also send a copy of each<br />

production to every other party<br />

unless it is not practicable to do so.<br />

It is understood that these<br />

disclosure provisions are intended<br />

to encourage and facilitate<br />

settlement. A further new provision<br />

is that a copy of each production<br />

for the use of the sheriff must be<br />

lodged with the sheriff clerk not<br />

later than 48 hours before the diet<br />

of proof.<br />

Actions with special rules<br />

It is not intended to go into any<br />

detail about actions with special<br />

rules other than actions of damages<br />

for personal injury which are dealt<br />

with below.<br />

Multiplepoindings and actions of<br />

count reckoning and payment often<br />

appear to cause dread in the heart<br />

of the practitioner (and of some<br />

sheriffs too), but the summary<br />

cause rules governing them are<br />

clearly expressed and, if followed<br />

accurately, should cause no difficulty.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rules for actions for recovery of<br />

possession of heritable property<br />

are little changed. It may be of some<br />

importance to note that the<br />

requirement for a written defence<br />

in the form of response applies to<br />

such actions as well as any other.<br />

Those advising defenders should<br />

bear in mind that a defence stated<br />

as “unreasonable to grant decree of<br />

ejection” without further<br />

specification is unlikely to meet with<br />

a sympathetic reception by the<br />

sheriff.<br />

Actions of damages for<br />

personal injury<br />

In the case of an action of damages<br />

for personal injury (or in respect of<br />

the death of a person from<br />

personal injury) the actual form of<br />

the statement of claim is specified. It<br />

is set out in very much the same<br />

way as would be the<br />

condescendence in a standard<br />

reparation ordinary cause. It is<br />

specifically provided that the<br />

statement of claim must contain a<br />

concise statement of the grounds of<br />

action and the facts relied upon to<br />

establish the claim. <strong>The</strong> pursuer’s<br />

date of birth and, where applicable,<br />

his National Insurance number, must<br />

35 May 2002 Volume 47 No 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!