02.02.2013 Views

D28: Internal seiche mixing study - Hydromod

D28: Internal seiche mixing study - Hydromod

D28: Internal seiche mixing study - Hydromod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integrated Water Resource Management for Important Deep European Lakes and their Catchment Areas<br />

EUROLAKES<br />

<strong>D28</strong>: <strong>Internal</strong> <strong>seiche</strong> <strong>mixing</strong> <strong>study</strong><br />

FP5_Contract No.: EVK1-CT1999-00004<br />

Version: 1.2<br />

Date: 24.08.2004<br />

File: <strong>D28</strong>.doc<br />

Page 35 of 92<br />

where a and b are constants. Using dimensional analysis, Welander (1968) suggested<br />

that, depending on the origins of turbulence, two limiting cases given by b = -0.5 for<br />

shear induced turbulence and b = -1 for cascading 2D turbulence. Heinz et al. (1990)<br />

summarized results from different lakes where b was found to range between – 0.4 and<br />

–0.7 indicating <strong>mixing</strong> in lakes is predominantly generated by local shear and internal<br />

waves. In Lac Léman, values of b are found between –0.4 and –0.6 (Figure 27) indicating<br />

that energy cascading is not important. A value of –0.4 falls outside the range<br />

predicted by Welander. However, Jassby and Powell (1975) who found the same value<br />

already noted that the assumptions of steady state and horizontal homogeneity made<br />

by Welander are most likely not fulfilled over periods of several months.<br />

Our results indicate that during summer stratification, turbulent <strong>mixing</strong> in the upper water<br />

column is predominantly caused by processes related to internal <strong>seiche</strong>s and progressive<br />

internal waves (Lemmin et al., 1998; Thorpe et al. 1996; Thorpe and Jiang,<br />

1998) quantified by the order of magnitude of the <strong>mixing</strong> coefficient. The increase of Kz<br />

with N 2b (and depth) ends at a depth of ≈ 90 m (see Figure 27). Below that depth an<br />

exponential correlation between Kz and N 2b cannot be established indicating that processes<br />

other than those considered by Welander dominate the turbulent <strong>mixing</strong>.<br />

3.3 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS<br />

3.3.1 Model Description<br />

We use a slightly modified version of the three-dimensional numerical code ‘GETM’,<br />

developed by Burchard and Bolding (2002). A detailed mathematical description of this<br />

model is given in their report. Here we only mention its main features.<br />

The model solves the three-dimensional shallow-water equations for momentum and<br />

heat with a free surface as the upper boundary condition. The Boussinesq assumption<br />

has been adopted, implying that the balance of mass simplifies to a statement of zero<br />

divergence of the velocity field. As in all models of this type, pressure is computed from<br />

the hydrostatic balance, and certain types of barotropic and baroclinic waves cannot be<br />

reproduced. Among them are waves short in comparison with the local water depth and<br />

non-linear solitary waves. However, in the context of this section, <strong>mixing</strong> caused by long<br />

internal waves is emphasized, and these restrictions are hardly relevant.<br />

Quite to the contrary, the capability of the model to predict the evolution and propagation<br />

of steep non-linear waves or ‘bores’ is relevant in Lac Léman as illustrated below.<br />

To capture the essential physics of these waves, it is necessary to retain the non-linear<br />

advection terms in the horizontal momentum balance. Since it is well-known that the<br />

classical first-order upstream schemes for the numerical discretisation of these terms<br />

have great difficulties in reproducing steep waves because of their excessive numerical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!