07.02.2013 Views

Constraints on Women Entrepreneurship Development in Kerala: An ...

Constraints on Women Entrepreneurship Development in Kerala: An ...

Constraints on Women Entrepreneurship Development in Kerala: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In both the WMU and the whole group, more than <strong>on</strong>e-half the entrepreneurs c<strong>on</strong>sidered the<br />

performance of their units ‘not successful’. The proporti<strong>on</strong> of clear success cases was <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

around 30 percent.<br />

The proporti<strong>on</strong> of successful units was found to be the highest am<strong>on</strong>g MMUs, followed by<br />

JMUs; <strong>in</strong> WMUs, the successful cases were the lowest, <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e-third (Table 3.3).<br />

Table 3.3 Levels of Performance of <strong>Women</strong> Enterprises by WMUs, JMU, and MMU Types<br />

Group Successful Average Unsuccessful Total<br />

No. (percent) No. (percent) No. (percent) No. (percent)<br />

WMU 33 (33.3) 27 (29.7) 31 (34.1) 91 (100)<br />

JMU 20 (35.1) 12 (21.0) 25 (43.9) 57 (100)<br />

MMU 26 (50.0) 11 (21.12) 15 (28.8) 52 (100)<br />

TOTAL 79 (39.5) 50 (25.0) 71 (35.5) 200(100.0)<br />

While WMUs’ success rate is lower than that of MMUs, the rate of n<strong>on</strong>-success is the<br />

highest am<strong>on</strong>g the JMUs. In order to understand the causes for the lower performance<br />

levels of JMUs, some attempt is made later <strong>in</strong> this secti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Community<br />

The distributi<strong>on</strong> of the entrepreneurs accord<strong>in</strong>g to religious groups is given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.4.<br />

H<strong>in</strong>dus c<strong>on</strong>stituted 72.5 percent, Christians 15.5 percent and Muslims 12.5 percent. The<br />

majority of the entrepreneurs bel<strong>on</strong>ged to backward castes (62 percent) and Scheduled<br />

Castes (9.5 percent) [Table 3.5].<br />

Table3.5 Distributi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>Women</strong> Entrepreneurs by Religi<strong>on</strong> and Community Status<br />

Religi<strong>on</strong> Forward Backward Scheduled Total<br />

H<strong>in</strong>du 52 (35.86) 76 (52.41) 17 (11.72) 145 (72.5)<br />

Christian 5 (16.12) 26 (83.87) 0 31 (15.5)<br />

Muslim 0 22 (91.66) 2 (8.3) 24 (12.0)<br />

Total 57 (28.5) 124 (62.0) 19 (9.5) 200 (100)<br />

Most of those who came under backward and Scheduled Caste communities were H<strong>in</strong>dus;<br />

a few Christians and all the Muslims came under the category of backward communities.<br />

The distributi<strong>on</strong> of entrepreneurs by community accord<strong>in</strong>g to group status is given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.6.<br />

Table 3.6 Distributi<strong>on</strong> of Entrepreneurs by Community accord<strong>in</strong>g to Group Status<br />

Group Forward Backward Scheduled Total<br />

WMU 31 (34.1) 47 (51.6) 13 (14.3) 91 (100)<br />

JMU 16 (28.1) 38 (66.7) 3 (5.3) 57 (100)<br />

MMU 10 (19.2) 39 (75.0) 3 (5.8) 52 (100)<br />

Total 57(28.5) 124(62.0) 19(9.5) 200(100.0)<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!