10.02.2013 Views

Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cultural Resource Investigations<br />

Summary of Previous Surveys and Research<br />

A summary of previous surveys and research directly associated with what is now <strong>Guam</strong> NWR is provided<br />

in Table 1. The first professional archaeological studies of <strong>Guam</strong> and the Mariana Islands were<br />

sponsored in the 1920s by the Bishop Museum in Honolulu. Subsequent fieldwork, both on a landscape<br />

level and specific to Ritidian, has been conducted by the military, the <strong>National</strong> Park Service, and most<br />

recently, the Service. For those projects dating 1990 and later, the survey location information is adequate<br />

for mapping purposes. The total area of the Ritidian Unit for which documentation of systematic survey<br />

exists is approximately 14 acres, as presented in Figure 3.<br />

1925 - Hans Hornbostel<br />

Hans Hornbostel surveyed Ritidian and excavated a fairly extensive area, in addition to investigating other<br />

islands in the Marianas. Hornbostel’s work provided the first documented evidence of a Chamorro village<br />

and Spanish mission on the beach at Ritidian. Nearly 10,000 artifacts collected by Hornbostel constitute the<br />

Marianas collection curated by the Department of Anthropology at the Bishop Museum.<br />

1932 - Laura Mead Thompson<br />

In 1932, Dr. Laura Thompson published a synthesis of Hornbostel’s collection, photographs, and field<br />

notes entitled Archaeology of the Mariana Islands as Bishop Museum Bulletin 100.<br />

1947 - Douglas Osborne<br />

In 1947, Douglas Osborne, an officer assigned to the Military Police Battalion on <strong>Guam</strong>, conducted a series<br />

of surveys and limited excavations around the island. He found little evidence of lattes intact on the beaches,<br />

but observed more intact evidence on the inland rivers in the southern half of <strong>Guam</strong>. The beach sites<br />

appear to have been heavily impacted by the war years and perhaps even earlier by the Spanish. Osborne<br />

briefly visited the northern coast and notes that “from Oruno around the whole northern to northeastern<br />

coast on the island there is a continual archaeological area” (Osborne 1947:47 in Liston 1996:65). Osborne<br />

also described several small latte groups at Ritidian in a state of poor preservation (Osborne 1947:47 in<br />

Liston 1996:67).<br />

1952 - Erik Reed<br />

Reed surveyed areas of <strong>Guam</strong> for the U.S. <strong>National</strong> Park Service with an aim to protect, preserve, and<br />

possibly develop prehistoric and historic sites for interpretation. He focused on relocating the sites identified<br />

by Hornbostel and Osborne rather than making new discoveries. Reed did not relocate the latte set at<br />

Ritidian. However, he did describe the surviving Spanish structure as being located on the beach strand<br />

below Ritidian Point.<br />

1977 - Fred Reinman<br />

In 1977, F. R. Reinman, sponsored by a <strong>National</strong> Science Foundation Grant and the Field Museum of<br />

Natural History in Chicago, conducted a comprehensive survey of large portions of <strong>Guam</strong> and test excavated<br />

five sites. He also prepared standardized site forms for the archaeological sites he visited.<br />

1990 - Kurashina et al<br />

Archaeological investigations conducted by the Navy in 1987-1989 in compliance with the <strong>National</strong> Historic<br />

Preservation Act revealed pockets of intact cultural deposits, several burials, and areas that had been<br />

truncated by previous building projects (Kurashina et al. 1990). Based on their field efforts, Kurashina<br />

noted that while cultural deposits exist close to the forebeach, the western portion of the midbeach appears<br />

to have been the location of the main prehistoric occupation.<br />

15 <strong>Guam</strong> NWR - Cultural Resources Overview and Management <strong>Plan</strong> - 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!