Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Hasan, S. and P.G. Ayres. 1990. The control of weeds through fungi: principles and prospects. Tansley Review 23:201-222. Huddleston, J.H. 1996. How soil properties affect groundwater vulnerability to pesticide contamination. EM 8559. Oregon State University Extension Service. 4 pages. Kerle, E.A., J.J. Jenkins, P.A. Vogue. 1996. Understanding pesticide persistence and mobility for groundwater and surface water protection. EM 8561. Oregon State University Extension Service. 8 pages. Masters, R.A, and R.L. Sheley. 2001. Invited synthesis paper: principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. Journal of Range Manage 54:502-517. Masters, R.A., S.J. Nissen, R.E. Gaussoin, D.D. Beran, and R.N. Stougaard. 1996. Imidazolinone herbicides improve restoration of Great Plains grasslands. Weed Technology 10:392-403. Maxwell, B.D., E. Lehnhoff, L.J. Rew. 2009. The rationale for monitoring invasive plant populations as a crucial step for management. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2:1-9. Mineau, P., B.T. Collins, and A. Baril. 1996. On the use of scaling factors to improve interspecies extrapolation to acute toxicity in birds. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 24:24- 29. Moody, M.E., and R.N. Mack. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology 25:1009-1021. Morse, L.E., J.M. Randall, N. Benton, R. Hiebert, and S. Lu. 2004. An Invasive Species Assessment Protocol: NatureServe. Mullin, B.H., L.W. Anderson, J.M. DiTomaso, R.E. Eplee, and K.D. Getsinger. 2000. Invasive Plant Species. Issue Paper (13):1-18. Oregon State University. 1996. EXTOXNET-Extension Toxicology Network, Pesticide Information Profiles. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Pfleeger, T.G., A. Fong, R. Hayes, H. Ratsch, C. Wickliff. 1996. Field evaluation of the EPA (Kanaga) nomogram, a method for estimating wildlife exposure to pesticide residues on plants. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15:535-543. Pope, R., J. DeWitt, and J. Ellerhoff. 1999. Pesticide movement: what farmers need to know. Extension Publication PAT 36, Iowa State University Extension, Ames, Iowa and Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship, Des Moines, Iowa. 6 pages. Ramsay, C.A., G.C. Craig, and C.B. McConnell. 1995. Clean water for Washington – protecting groundwater from pesticide contamination. Extension Publication EB1644, Washington State University Extension, Pullman, Washington. 12 pages. J-50 Appendix J. Integrated Pest Management Program
Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan SDTF 2003 Spray Drift Task Force. 2003. A summary of chemigation application studies. Spray Drift Task Force, Macon, Missouri. Teske, M.E., S.L. Bird, D.M. Esterly, S.L. Ray, S.G. and Perry. 1997. A User's Guide for AgDRIFT TM 1.0: A Tiered Approach for the Assessment of Spray Drift of Pesticides, Technical Note No. 95-10, CDI, Princeton, New Jersey. Teske, M.E., S.L. Bird, D.M. Esterly, T.B. Curbishley, S.L. Ray, and S.G. Perry. 2002. AgDRIFT®: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21: 659-671. Urban, D.J and N.J. Cook. 1986. Hazard evaluation division standard, standard evaluation procedure, ecological risk assessment. Office of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC. 101 pages. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. A Comparative Analysis of Ecological Risks from Pesticides and Their Uses: Background, Methodology & Case Study. Environmental Fate & Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 105 pages. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Overview of the ecological risk assessment process in the Office of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency: endangered and threatened species effects determinations, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC. 101 pages. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005a. Technical overview of ecological risk assessment risk characterization; Approaches for evaluating exposure; Granular, bait, and treated seed applications. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/ecorisk_ders/toera_analysis_exp.htm. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005b. User’s Guide TREX v1.2.3. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC. 22 pages. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/terrestrial/trex_usersguide.htm. US Forest Service. 2005. Pacific Northwest Region Invasive Plant Program Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement. 359 pages. US Geological Survey. 2000. Pesticides in stream sediment and aquatic biota – current understanding of distribution and major influences. USGS Fact Sheet 092-00, US Geological Survey, Sacramento, California. 4 pages. Wauchope, R.D., T.M. Buttler, A.G. Hornsby, P.M. Augustijn-Beckers, and J.P. Burt. 1992. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database for environmental decision making. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 123:1-155. Woods, N. 2004. Australian developments in spray drift management. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application for Drift Management, Waikoloa, Hawaii. 8 pages. Appendix J. Integrated Pest Management Program J-51
Page 1 and 2:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Guam N
Page 5:
Guam National Wildlife Refuge Compr
Page 8 and 9:
vi Guam National Wildlife Refuge Co
Page 10 and 11:
viii Guam National Wildlife Refuge
Page 12 and 13:
1.2 Agency Background Guam National
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Temperature ( o F) Precipitation (i
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Sea Level Rise Guam National Wildli
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Mariana fruit bat Guam National Wil
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Interpretive Materials Guam Nationa
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155:
Page 158 and 159:
Use: Traditional Gathering Guam Nat
Page 160 and 161:
Description of Use(s): Guam Nationa
Page 162:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191:
USFWS Photo U.S. Fish & Wildlife Se
Page 195 and 196:
Table of Contents Figures and Table
Page 197 and 198:
Introduction Ranging from evidence
Page 199 and 200:
Background Environmental Setting Gu
Page 201 and 202:
ing island of Rota and the natural
Page 203 and 204:
starchy foods is evidenced by a num
Page 205 and 206:
great deal of information about the
Page 207 and 208:
were turbulent as the Navy tried to
Page 209 and 210:
sional --although not constitutiona
Page 211 and 212:
Cultural Resource Investigations Su
Page 213 and 214:
Figure 3. Previously surveyed areas
Page 215 and 216:
Documented Cultural Resources Sites
Page 217 and 218:
Purported vicinity of “Mission Si
Page 219 and 220:
Management Plan/ Recommendations Gu
Page 221 and 222:
Table 2. Priority list of cultural
Page 223 and 224:
Collections Management: There are r
Page 225 and 226:
References Allen, S. Jane 1988 Geoa
Page 227 and 228:
Appendix A Regulatory Consideration
Page 229 and 230:
Appendix B Contacts and Consultatio
Page 231 and 232:
Appendix C Comprehensive Conservati
Page 233 and 234:
Discussion: Development of an MOA p
Page 236 and 237: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Region
Page 238 and 239: 2.0 Pest Management Policies Guam N
Page 240 and 241: Guam National Wildlife Refuge Compr
Page 250 and 251: 6.0 Safety 6.1 Personal Protective
Page 258 and 259: Where: Guam National Wildlife Refug
Page 278 and 279: Threshold for Approving PUPs: Guam
Page 284 and 285: Habitat Management Treatments: Guam
Page 333 and 334: Scientific Name MICRO-ORGANISM Guam
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357:
Guam National Wildlife Refuge P.O.
show all

Guam National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?