owner of Holdco, wrongfully excluded Dale, a co-shareholder
owner of Holdco, wrongfully excluded Dale, a co-shareholder
owner of Holdco, wrongfully excluded Dale, a co-shareholder
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GASTOPS LTD. C. FORSYTH,<br />
2012 ONCA 134<br />
• [50] (...) As <strong>of</strong> October 1996, GasTOPS was an industry leader in a<br />
highly technical and specialized business with a small number <strong>of</strong><br />
very large customers. Its suite <strong>of</strong> programs, its existing customers,<br />
its customized products, its potential business opportunities and its<br />
related <strong>co</strong>nfidential and technical business information all had taken<br />
some <strong>co</strong>nsiderable years to develop. Mxl <strong>co</strong>uld and did use all this<br />
to portray their product as simply the next iteration <strong>of</strong> the GasTOPS<br />
suite <strong>of</strong> products, making it easy to attract large customers away<br />
from GasTOPS into long-term relationships. All this was amply<br />
demonstrated by the evidence. The trial judge’s <strong>co</strong>nclusion was that<br />
on these facts the damages for breach <strong>of</strong> the fiduciary duty imposed<br />
on the four personal appellants and the duty <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong>nfidence imposed<br />
on all <strong>of</strong> the appellants lasted ten years. That <strong>co</strong>nclusion deserves<br />
deference. In my view, it cannot be said to be unreasonable. In the<br />
particular circumstances <strong>of</strong> this case, the appellants’ assertion that<br />
the ac<strong>co</strong>unting period is not measured and proportional cannot be<br />
sustained.<br />
45