Aeneid - Vergilian Society

– (1987): The Aeneid. Unwin Critical Library [N. Horsfall, CR 38, 1988, 410-11; H. H.
Huxley, PVS 19, 1988, 30-1; Smith, Hermathena 145, 1988, 66-7; G. D’Anna, Gnomon
61, 1989, 626-7; H. V. Bender, CW 83, 1989-90, 71; R. J. Clark, EMC 34, 1990, 85-7; P.
Hardie, JRS 80, 1990, 268; J. H. Molyneux, Latomus 49, 1990, 178-80]
– /Carter, C. J. (1974): “Critical Appreciations II: Virgil, Aeneid xii.843-86”, G&R 21, 165-
77 = McAuslan/Walcot (1990), 167-79.
– /Pattie, T. S. (1982): Virgil. His Poetry through the Ages (London) [B. C. Barker-Benfield,
CR 33, 1983, 321; I. McAuslan, G&R 30, 1983, 216; A. G. McKay, Phoenix 37, 1983, 91-
2; W. Suerbaum, Gnomon 56, 1984, 208-28].
Williams, Rose (2003): The Labors of Aeneas: What a Pain It Was to Found the Roman Race
(Wauconda, IL).
Wills, Jeffrey (1987): “Scyphus – a Homeric Hapax in Virgil”, AJPh 108, 455-7.
– (1996): Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion (Oxford) [A. Sharrock, G&R 44,
1997, 224; D. P. Nelis, BMCRev 98.5.17; R. G. M. Nisbet, CR 48, 1998, 298-300; J.
O’Hara, JRS 88, 1998, 197; M. C. J. Putnam, AJPh 119, 1998, 295-300; B. Vine, CJ 94,
1998/9, 195-200; J. Zetzel, CPh 94, 1999, 103-11; J. Dangel, Latomus 59, 2000, 149-52].
– (1997): “Homeric and Virgilian Doublets: The Case of Aeneid 6.901”, MD 38, 185-202.
– (1998): “Divided Allusion: Virgil and the Coma Berenices”, HSPh 98, 277-305.
Wilson, C. H. (1979): “Jupiter and the Fates in the Aeneid”, CQ 29, 361-71.
Wiltshire, Susan Ford (1979): “Aeneas in America”, Vergilius 25, 2-9.
– (1982): “Vergil’s Aeneid: Poetry and the Public Realm”, in McKay (1982), 118-44.
– (1984): “Self-distancing in the Aeneid”, Vergilius 30, 25-31.
– (1989): Public and Private in Vergil’s Aeneid (Amherst); 38-55 [R. J. Clark, Phoenix 43,
1989, 378-81; D. Fowler, G&R 36, 1989, 236-7; W. S. Anderson, CW 83, 1989/90, 545; R.
Moorton, NECN 17, 1989/90, 42-3; S. J. Harrison, CR 40, 1990, 27-8; S. Mack, AJPh 111,
1990, 570-73; C. Perkell, Vergilius 36, 1990, 143-5; C. Kallendorf, Helios 18, 1991, 73-4.
80-2; B. W. Boyd, CJ 87, 1991-2, 186-9; R. Lesueur, Latomus 51, 1992, 427-9; J. Rexine,
CB 69, 1993, 118-21; J. Rexine, Platon 45, 1993, 168-70].
– (1992): “War and Peace in Aeneid 10”, in Wilhelm/Jones (1992), 189-205.
– (1999): “The Man Who Was not there: Aeneas and Absence in Aeneid 9”, in Perkell
(1999a), 162-77.
– /Krickel, A. H. (1982): “Diomedes and Aeneas: A Vergilian Paradox”, CB 58, 73-7.
Wimmel, Walter (1973): ‘Hirtenkrieg’ und arkadisches Rom: Reduktionsmedien in Vergils
Aeneis. Abhandlungen der Marburger Gelehrten Gesellschaft 1972.1 (München); 109-29 =
id., Collectanea. Augusteertum und späte Republik. Herausgegeben von Klaus Kubusch
(Stuttgart, 1987), 219-39 [H. Koch, Gymnasium 78, 1971, 483-4; K. Vretska, Gymnasium
81, 1974, 558-60; E. Christmann, Gnomon 48, 1976, 32-6; M. C. J. Putnam, CPh 71, 1976,
283-6].
Winkler, Martin M. (1987): “‘Tuque optime vates’: Musaeus in Book Six of the Aeneid”,
AJPh 108, 655-60.
Winterbottom, Michael (1993): “Aeneas and the Idea of Troy”, PVS 21, 17-34.
Wirshbo, E. (1979): “On Mistranslating Vergil: Aeneid 1.203”, CW 73, 177-8.
Wiseman, T. P. (1984): “Cybele, Virgil and Augustus”, in Woodman, Tony/West, David
(1984; edd.): Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus (Cambridge), 117-28.
Wistrand, Erik (1984): “Aeneas and Augustus in the Aeneid”, Eranos 82, 195-8.
Witek, Franz (2006): Vergils Landschaften: Versuch einer Typologie literarischer Landschaft.
Spudasmata 111. Hildesheim.
Wlosok, Antonie (1967): Die Göttin Venus in Vergils Aeneis (Heidelberg) [V. Pöschl, AAHG
23, 1969, 10-12].
– (1973): “Vergil in der neueren Forschung”, Gymnasium 80, 129-51.
114