Aeneid - Vergilian Society

– (1985a): “Possessiveness, Sexuality and Heroism in the Aeneid”, Vergilius 31, 1-21 =
Putnam (1995d), 27-49.
– (1985b): “Romulus tropaeophorus (Aeneid 6.779-80), CQ 35, 237-40.
– (1987): “Daedalus, Virgil, and the End of Art”, AJPh 108, 173-198 = Putnam (1995d), 73-
99 = [“Daedalus’ Sculptures”] Putnam (1998c), 75-96 = S. Quinn (2000), 220-40.
– (1988): “Virgil’s Inferno”, MD 20-1, 165-202 = Putnam (1995d), 286-315.
– (1989a): “Catullus 11 and Virgil Aen. 6.786-7”, Vergilius 35, 28-30.
– (1989b): “Virgil and Tacitus, Ann. 1.10”, CQ 39, 563-4.
– (1990a): “Anger, Blindness and Insight in Virgil’s Aeneid”, in Nussbaum, Martha C.
(1990; ed.): The Poetics of Therapy: Hellenistic Ethics in Its Rhetorical and Literary
Context. Apeiron 23.4 (Edmonton), 7-40 = Putnam (1995d), 172-200.
– (1990b): “Virgil’s Lapiths”, CQ 40, 562-6.
– (1992a): “Virgil’s Tragic Future: Senecan Drama and the Aeneid”, in La storia, la
letteratura e l’arte a Roma da Tiberio a Domiziano. Atti del Convegno 63-5058, 231-91 =
Putnam (1995d), 246-85.
– (1992b): “Umbro, Nireus and Love’s Threnody”, Vergilius 38, 12-23 = Putnam (1995d),
121-33.
– (1994): “Virgil’s Danaid Ekphrasis”, ICS 19, 171-89 = [“The Baldric of Pallas”] Putnam
(1998c), 189-207.
– (1995a): “Ganymede and Virgilian Ekphrasis”, AJPh 116, 419-440 = [“The Cloak of
Cloanthus”] Putnam (1998c), 55-74.
– (1995b): “The Lyric Genius of the Aeneid”, Arion 3.2, 81-101 = S. Quinn (2000), 255-66.
– (1995c): “Silvia’s Stag and Virgilian Ekphrasis”, MD 34, 107-33 = [“Silvia’s Stag”]
Putnam (1998c), 97-118.
– (1995d): Virgil’s Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence (Chapel Hill und London) [C. R.
Beye, Vergilius 41, 1995, 139-41; A. Videau, RPh 69, 396-8; R. V. Albis, NECN 23,
1995/6, 78-9; R. F. Glei, Gymnasium 103, 1996, 470-2; P. Hardie, CR 46, 1996, 239-41; D.
F. Kennedy, G&R 43, 1996, 88-9; E. A. Schmidt, MH 53, 1996, 322; S. Viarre, AC 65,
1996, 330; V. J. Cleary, CO 74, 1996/7, 79-80; A. G. McKay, IJCT 3, 1996/7, 518-20; P.
Properzio, CW 90, 1996/7, 455-6; G. Williams, CJ 92, 1996/7, 185-9; A. Traina, RFIC
125, 1997, 225-7; J. R. Amiott, Argos 23, 1999, 138-41; A. Barchiesi, Gnomon 71, 1999,
262-4; P. Heuzé, Latomus 60, 2001, 516-7].
– (1995e): Wrathful Aeneas and the Tactics of Pietas in Virgil, Ovid, and Lucan”, in Putnam
(1995d), 201-45.
– (1998a): “Dido’s Murals and Virgilian Ekphrasis”, HSPh 98, 243-75 = [“Dido’s Murals”]
Putnam (1998c), 23-54.
– (1998b): “The Shield of Aeneas”, in Putnam (1998c), 119-88.
– (1998c): Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid (New Haven und London) [M.
Lowrie, Vergilius 45, 1999, 111-20; S. Bartsch, CR 50, 2000, 47-8; A. S. Becker, AJPh
121, 2000, 324-8; P. Hardie, JRS 90, 2000, 239-40; J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 68, 2000, 260; S.
Casali, CJ 96, 2000/1, 99-101; G. De Callataÿ, Latomus 60, 2001, 226-7; P. Schenk,
AAHG 54, 2001, 22-31].
– (1999a): “Aeneid 12: Unity in Closure”, in Perkell (1999a), 210-30.
– (1999b): “Turnus, Homer, and Heroism”, Literary Imagination 1, 61-78.
– (2001a): “The Ambiguity of Art in Virgil’s Aeneid”, Proceedings of the American
Philosophical Society 145, 162-83.
– (2001b): “The Loom of Latin”, TAPhA 131, 329-39.
– (2001c): “Vergil’s Aeneid: The Final Lines”, in Spence (2001b), 86-104.
– (2002a): “Turnus’ Phalarica (Aen. IX, 705)”, in Defosse, Pol (2002; ed.): Hommages à
Carl Deroux. I: Poésie. Collection Latomus 266 (Bruxelles), 433-42.
89